Dems lost again on Impeachment

Oh my another failure!

They couldn’t even convict Collins or Murkousky!?

....the vote to acquit was the only bipartisan vote too.

Acquitted forever. 👆

#StillWinning.

Who from the dems voted to acquit?

Minority Leader troll Nancy

Trump has a scarlet letter on him, an A for Acquitted.

What's the list on the final vote? I want to see that.

Found the full list ( scroll to the bottom):

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2019/trump-impeachment-vote-count-senate-results/

This is literally the most partisan vote ever. With only Mitt falling out of line for just Article I.

I sure hope the Dems lost their jobs in 2020 and 2022 when election cycle happens. As many as possible, please. Clear them out!

If Mitt felt Trump was guilty why'd he want more witnesses?

My bad, I'm sure it was to give the witnesses a chance to exonerate Trump, right? Who believes this?

Mitt is such a little Schitt and an opportunist. As soon as he saw an opening in the senate he moves to Utah😂

Mitt is such a little weasel. No wonder he got his butt kicked by the pussy community organizer from Chicago lol.

Well the car war was won by the unions so the Republicans do have to still actually produce or lose.

Shes just an old establishment **** who thinks her constituents are retards. I hope the DNC get steamrolled every election after Trump, if they think the orthodox corporatist Obama type dems are what the majority of people want. No sympathy for the dems at all.

Originally posted by carthage
Shes just an old establishment **** who thinks her constituents are retards. I hope the DNC get steamrolled every election after Trump, if they think the orthodox corporatist Obama type dems are what the majority of people want. No sympathy for the dems at all.

😂

enjoy the pretend-exoneration 👆

The Chief Justice said he was acquitted

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
enjoy the pretend-exoneration 👆

By all means, dazzle us with your extensive legal knowledge and explain how it's a "pretend-exoneration".

Originally posted by Silent Master
By all means, dazzle us with your extensive legal knowledge and explain how it's a "pretend-exoneration".

Originally posted by Silent Master
By all means, dazzle us with your extensive legal knowledge and explain how it's a "pretend-exoneration".

aquital and exoneration are not the same thing. no law degree required, just a dictionary and basic reading comprehension.

lol epic-level butthurt being displayed from bashy... not surprising. He's the only one doing any pretending here.

ACQUITTED, FOREVER. 🙂

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
aquital and exoneration are not the same thing. no law degree required, just a dictionary and basic reading comprehension.

Sorry to burst your bubble but exoneration just means officially absolving someone of guilt. He was found not guilty in an official trial. Therefore he was indeed exonerated.

I'm so sorry this happened to you.