Originally posted by TGATES
He may actually be. It may be like 1-2 mph. By how much is he faster? That is the central issue. Is it enough to matter? Has it mattered in the past?I think writer intent puts them equal since she he is able to blitz her ala Sacrafice but the fight took a turn. Diana got more clean punches off Superman.
It's usually blow for blow or Diana getting more licks. This would not happen if writers want him to be significantly faster when they meet, not in other scenarios from other books.
Same with "For Tomorrow". He blitz, but it didn't really do anything to change the tide of the fight. She still uses speed to kick the shit out of him. Why didn't he didn't dodge the kick if she is significantly faster? Why didn't he dodge her tiara when she slit his throat? We can go back and say "oh she wasn't able to get brackets up before he blitz her to the sun". We could also say she is faster or just as fast since she was able to slit his throat.
In each and every fight, he simple is not able to get more licks off of her.
We also need to take into consideration how Cheetah( a reg WW villain) scales to Superman and other speedsters.
Writers intend for her to be as fast or faster when they fight. It's been like that almost all the time.
Superman has enemies that can keep up with him too. That can keep up with Wonder Woman, so I wouldn't say Cheetah is in a league of her own.
Superman has done just fine against her in the past. Even in Sacrifice, when he's compromised, he'd still easily fast enough to keep up with her if not faster. In For Tomorrow he, if we're being honest, kind of embarassed her, and it wasn't like they were just sparring.
If you want to argue that the gap between them isn't really that big either way, I'm honestly not going to argue with you. I actually like the idea of them, in reflexes at least, being pretty close.
The problem is the multitude of "Superman builds x really fast" feats, and he has considerably more of those than Diana does. And they do translate to combat ability.