Originally posted by -Pr-
We don't share feats. If Masterson is intended to have Thor's full range of abilities to the same extent, then it should be shown on panel at least once or twice. Is it stated or shown that he's as strong and/or as powerful as Odinson?
It was shown that he had Thor's strength and durability.
1. By feats
2. by Masterson was merged with Thor (so it was Thor's actual body and wholeness). But Masterson didn't have the skill and knowledge of how to do the more exotic things.
3. Marvel stated such.
Originally posted by StoicPowerful and strength are two different things. Masterson was merged with Thor. He had his full strength (feats confirm, and marvel stated, and he was in Thor's body.) But Masterson didn't have the experience and skill.
Thor was actually more powerful than Masterson. Where is Rage at? A few years back, he posted scans of this.
Now when masterson was thunderstrike Thor was more powerful in every way (including strength).
Originally posted by StoicWhat comic? Thor and Masterson Thor were equal in strength as was dargo Thor. Thunderstrike was the one that was weaker because he had a mace that was weaker than Thor's hammer. Thor's hammer does not grant 80 or 90 percent of thors strength, it grants 100 percent as stated by Marvel themselves. There is nothing to debate. It is flat out stated that Masterson Thor had the FULL STRENGTH AND WEATHER ABILITIES OF THOR BY MARVEL THEMSELVES. Masterson was not as experienced as Thor. Like I stated,if I were to give you Superman powers and you didn't know how to fully use them the real Superman would beat your ass every time. But that would not make you less than him in strength and power
There was an actual comics that stated that Thor was more powerful, and stronger than Masterson.
Originally posted by carver9
Were those regular cowboys or do you need to go back and read (never read) the comic again?
You must not have read what I wrote.
You said doomsday was faster, so I asked what are the speed feats of doomsday that makes him faster than hulk.
TBH I don't see why you should bring up hulk blitzing some cowboys, I mean what kinda feat is that?
Originally posted by 9jaboy
You must not have read what I wrote.
You said doomsday was faster, so I asked what are the speed feats of doomsday that makes him faster than hulk.TBH I don't see why you should bring up hulk blitzing some cowboys, I mean what kinda feat is that?
I'm going to tell you this again since I know you havent read the book. The cowboy showing, read the comic and then come back to me and discuss fts.
Originally posted by 9jaboy
You must not have read what I wrote.
You said doomsday was faster, so I asked what are the speed feats of doomsday that makes him faster than hulk.TBH I don't see why you should bring up hulk blitzing some cowboys, I mean what kinda feat is that?
I posted this link earlier. Those cowboys were enhanced and moving at superspeed themselves.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
I posted this link earlier. Those cowboys were enhanced and moving at superspeed themselves.
There are different levels of superspeed. Wolverine and Spider-Man have super speed. Batman and Cap have superspeed.
Showing Hulk has "super speed" is not a feat to show being faster or as fast as DD. It's a dumb feat Tbh. It's only purpose is to prove that Hulk is faster than a real life human (which he is without the feat).
Originally posted by h1a8
There are different levels of superspeed. Wolverine and Spider-Man have super speed. Batman and Cap have superspeed.Showing Hulk has "super speed" is not a feat to show being faster or as fast as DD. It's a dumb feat Tbh. It's only purpose is to prove that Hulk is faster than a real life human (which he is without the feat).
Wait... did you say Wolverine and Spiderman have SUPER speed? And Batman and Cap? WTF