Joe Biden accused of sexual assault

Started by Surtur43 pages
Originally posted by Eon Blue
Jason Momoa can grab me by the pussy anytime.

But anyone is capable of grabbing thin air at anytime...

Originally posted by BackFire
DDM, do you think AOC would be a good candidate if she were a bit older? She's basically a younger less Jewish female version of Bernie Sanders.

Sorry I missed this.

Not at all. She's not intelligent enough, plays identity politics too much, and is an 8/10 SJW on the SJW scale.

She's a step down from Bernie in almost every single way.

Gabbard is a much better choice.

AOC legit helped retire dumb blonde jokes

Originally posted by Eternal Idol
I don't think there's anything wrong with Bernie as he is, and I'm not convinced the political and media establishment--and consequently, the electorate--would be much more receptive to or even honest about him and his policies if he were any younger or able to better convey his ideas. They're too wrapped up in their own bullshit to care, much less be objective about anything not part of their own bullshit.

At this point, I'd prefer an electorate that:

*was more empathetic toward the less fortunate, American or not

*actually researched the candidates and objectively weighed the merits of their policies before deciding whom to vote for

*questioned the claims of these candidates and their respective parties, and compared them to past actions, works, associations, and voting records

*didn't get blindly swept up by stupid backwards notions such as party loyalty, identity politics, and appearance/likeability/have-a-beer-with-ability, and

*actually showed up to vote, and not just for the presidential general election, but for every election and primary they were able to participate in.

I really appreciate you succinctly describing me as a voter and if I wasn't so arrogant, I'd probably be blushing. haermm

But, no, seriously, the type of voter you describe constitutes, perhaps, 1 out of 100 voters. Maybe even 1 out of 1000 voters. It doesn't even describe a majority of the people active in politics such as the volunteers.

More about Bernie: he's smart but...just not smart smart. He seems to lack a certain social awareness and charisma that many great leaders have. He is not great at reading people. In order for someone like Bernie to be elected, they need to be more intelligent and have two heaping scoops of charisma.

If this guy touted most of Bernie's policies, I think you'd have a person that could beat Trump (his intelligence, vigor, and charisma):

You might say he has an EYE for good policies?

Amirite? Amirite?

*Foxtrots*

Originally posted by Surtur
You might say he has an EYE for good policies?

Amirite? Amirite?

*Foxtrots*

Every Australian who sees him and greets him always says, "Good eye, mate."

The dingo ate muh babay. Came at me from the right side.

Awful.

Originally posted by Surtur
The dingo ate muh babay. Came at me from the right side.

Awful.

You mean "Came at meh from the roit soyde?"

Originally posted by dadudemon
I really appreciate you succinctly describing me as a voter and if I wasn't so arrogant, I'd probably be blushing. haermm

But, no, seriously, the type of voter you describe constitutes, perhaps, 1 out of 100 voters. Maybe even 1 out of 1000 voters. It doesn't even describe a majority of the people active in politics such as the volunteers.

More about Bernie: he's smart but...just not smart smart. He seems to lack a certain social awareness and charisma that many great leaders have. He is not great at reading people. In order for someone like Bernie to be elected, they need to be more intelligent and have two heaping scoops of charisma.

If this guy touted most of Bernie's policies, I think you'd have a person that could beat Trump (his intelligence, vigor, and charisma):

I think most Americans would only focus on the eyepatch and beard...which, again, is incredibly stupid to fixate on a candidate's appearance as any main criteria to vote for or against.

I know who Crenshaw is, but I'm not familiar with much of what he's said and done since his congressional debut last year.

Did a quick search; I'm not convinced by this article:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/03/07/fact-or-fiction-dan-crenshaw-takes-a-jab-at-socialist-policies-while-debunking-c-n2563780

Originally posted by Eternal Idol
I think most Americans would only focus on the eyepatch and beard...which, again, is incredibly stupid to fixate on a candidate's appearance as any main criteria to vote for or against.

I know who Crenshaw is, but I'm not familiar with much of what he's said and done since his congressional debut last year.

Did a quick search; I'm not convinced by this article:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/03/07/fact-or-fiction-dan-crenshaw-takes-a-jab-at-socialist-policies-while-debunking-c-n2563780

Crenshaw as a person, personality, and ability to speak to the public. Not his actual positions. His positions are are mix of good and terrible. If he updated his positions, he'd be great.

It's hard to know in how far Sanders would appeal to voters if there was less coordinated meddling by the Democratic establishment and the status-quo loving media.

The Kavanaugh Roasters Hide Biden’s Accuser

At this point the hypocrisy is irrefutable.

Originally posted by Surtur
The Kavanaugh Roasters Hide Biden’s Accuser

At this point the hypocrisy is irrefutable.

😆

Originally posted by Artol
It's hard to know in how far Sanders would appeal to voters if there was less coordinated meddling by the Democratic establishment and the status-quo loving media.

I'll give you that. That's about 90% of the problem. 10% is the stuff I'm talking about. If he had the support of the MSM and the Democratic Party, Sanders would be president right now, not Trump.

Originally posted by Surtur
The Kavanaugh Roasters Hide Biden’s Accuser

At this point the hypocrisy is irrefutable.

“Women have a right to tell their story, and reporters have an obligation to rigorously vet those claims,” deputy campaign manager Kate Bedingfield said in a statement. “We encourage them to do so, because these accusations are false.”

Wow. She's a word smith. She managed to almost smoothly virtue signal indirectly about the metoo movement while also rejecting the accusation. Pretty cool.

Originally posted by Eternal Idol
I think most Americans would only focus on the eyepatch and beard...which, again, is incredibly stupid to fixate on a candidate's appearance as any main criteria to vote for or against.

I know who Crenshaw is, but I'm not familiar with much of what he's said and done since his congressional debut last year.

Did a quick search; I'm not convinced by this article:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/03/07/fact-or-fiction-dan-crenshaw-takes-a-jab-at-socialist-policies-while-debunking-c-n2563780

Without that eyepatch, he would not even be ****able.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Without that eyepatch, he would not even be ****able.

HOLY SHIT 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

Anyways, why are Kavanaughs roasters hiding Biden’s accusers.

Also remember when Schumer said he was going to be impeached when they took back the house.

What happened with that?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Anyways, why are Kavanaughs roasters hiding Biden’s accusers.

Also remember when Schumer said he was going to be impeached when they took back the house.

What happened with that?


Biden and his crew are as scummy as Trump and his crew.

Originally posted by dadudemon
“Women have a right to tell their story, and reporters have an obligation to rigorously vet those claims,” deputy campaign manager Kate Bedingfield said in a statement. “We encourage them to do so, because these accusations are false.”

Wow. She's a word smith. She managed to almost smoothly virtue signal indirectly about the metoo movement while also rejecting the accusation. Pretty cool.

So the Biden campaign is saying she is a liar. I recall Trump getting in trouble for saying stuff about Blasey Ford.

But you know...Orange man.