MCU Ultron vs. Wonder Woman

Originally posted by h1a8
False, as all armor varies and aren't the same in durability. SW armor is more resistant to being cut than multiple feet of solid rock. Vibranium isn't proven to be and therefore it isn't.

I'd be more than happy to BZ Ultron's armor vs SW's.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'd be more than happy to BZ Ultron's armor vs SW's.

In cutting durability? Or blunt force?
Or blunt force = cutting?

If you want to claim that Ultron is especially vulnerable to cutting attacks, I'd be willing to BZ that.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If you want to claim that Ultron is especially vulnerable to cutting attacks, I'd be willing to BZ that.

Everything is vulnerable to cutting attacks to within a certain degree. Nothing is infinitely immune to cutting.

And we do not go out and measure the cutting resistance of fictional metal. We use feats. Lack of feats = lack of resistance.

Originally posted by h1a8
Everything is vulnerable to cutting attacks to within a certain degree. Nothing is infinitely immune to cutting.

Again, if you want to claim that Ultron is vulnerable to cutting attacks on the level of WW's sword, I'm willing to BZ it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Prove that Ultron is more durable than SW armor when it comes to being cut. Because SW armor is more resistant against cutting than multiple feet of rock.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, if you want to claim that Ultron is vulnerable to cutting attacks on the level of WW's sword, I'm willing to BZ it.

So you are claiming that Ultron has feats against being cut?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You have yet to prove anything. You seem upset Ultron buries the dcs best hero.

I gave a feat for SW armor. It resisted being cut by WW. WW sword has sliced a multi-ton boulder like a hot knife through butter.

Now if you don't have any feat by Ultron that's better than resisting a sword that can do that then by default it is weaker against cutting.A

Do you agree to BZ your claim?

Originally posted by h1a8
So you are claiming that Ultron has feats against being cut?

I gave a feat for SW armor. It resisted being cut by WW. WW sword has sliced a multi-ton boulder like a hot knife through butter.

Now if you don't have any feat by Ultron that's better than resisting a sword that can do that then by default it is weaker against cutting.A

Originally posted by quanchi112
Watch the film. You exaggerate.

This is a debate forum. Either put up feats or shut up. No feats = concession.

Originally posted by h1a8
This is a debate forum. Either put up feats or shut up. No feats = concession.

It's vulnerable to cutting attacks on the level of WW because it doesn't have any feats to show otherwise. Why make things complicated?

Originally posted by h1a8
It's vulnerable to cutting attacks on the level of WW because it doesn't have any feats to show otherwise. Why make things complicated?

Let's BZ your claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Let's BZ your claim.

So you are basically saying that you have proof that it is tougher to cut Ultron than through tons of rock. And that's the reason you want to BZ?

So, you agree to BZ?

You didn't answer the question.

I'm saying that I want to BZ your claim. So, do you agree to the BZ?

You didn't answer the question

You asked what I'm saying and I answered.

I'm saying that I'm willing to BZ your claim.

Originally posted by h1a8
It's vulnerable to cutting attacks on the level of WW because it doesn't have any feats to show otherwise. Why make things complicated?