What do you think of Project Veritas, really?

Originally posted by cdtm
Do you think they'd sink to lying outright about their flaws?

Or are their lies only in the service of exposing those flaws?

E.g., they'd go to any measure or tell any lie to prove they don't fact check a story, but would never lie about whether they actually fact checked a story.

For some reason, I can't comprehend how to respond.

Probably because I don't agree with your questions (because I'm stupid).

Project Veritas is interested in proving their agendas and they lie and use underhanded methods to get to the finish line. That's how I can answer your question.

I haven't eaten yet, today, so my brain doesn't work. Saturdays are pizza days and I skip breakfast to wait for the lunch time pizza to arrive.

They also edit videos on YouToob.

Originally posted by dadudemon
For some reason, I can't comprehend how to respond.

Probably because I don't agree with your questions (because I'm stupid).

Project Veritas is interested in proving their agendas and they lie and use underhanded methods to get to the finish line. That's how I can answer your question.

I haven't eaten yet, today, so my brain doesn't work. Saturdays are pizza days and I skip breakfast to wait for the lunch time pizza to arrive.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Project Veritas is interested in proving their agendas and they lie and use underhanded methods to get to the finish line.

Which is why I'm perplexed when a place like CNN gets upset at them. They have so much in common. It's like calling your identical twin ugly.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
The longest song ever written. Goes on for years.

YouTube video

Sure, they clearly hace an agenda.

What I'm asking is if you think their agenda is to expose them, or to make them look bad.

Two very different things. Edward Snowden may be many things, but he probably wasn't a liar. That doesn't change the fact he broke many laws, and endangered a lot of lives.

Snowden is a hero.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
YouTube video

Originally posted by cdtm
What I'm asking is if you think their agenda is to expose them, or to make them look bad.

https://www.projectveritas.com/news/retracto-no-313-stamford-advocate-clarifies-how-it-repeated-11-year-old-lie/

Looks likw the oft-repeated "selective editing" lawsuit was never about editing. They got sued for invasion of privacy.

At leaat in the case cited.

Citing Project Veritas in an investigation of Project Veritas is like using the bible to prove the veracity of the bible.

Or taking Biden/his campaign's word without doing an independent investigation.

Originally posted by cdtm
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/retracto-no-313-stamford-advocate-clarifies-how-it-repeated-11-year-old-lie/

Looks likw the oft-repeated "selective editing" lawsuit was never about editing. They got sued for invasion of privacy.

At leaat in the case cited.

I laughed, I wonder how the usual suspects will spin this.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Citing Project Veritas in an investigation of Project Veritas is like using the bible to prove the veracity of the bible.

There was a retraction.

A biased source does not make the article a lie.

Yeah I was gonna shut Adam down there but I figured you should get to do the honors. I wonder if he even read the article or just read the title. But wait he couldn't have read the article because he'd have known there was a retraction.

I swear if a place like The Daily Wire told these folk the sky is blue they'd be like "lol yeah right, alt right news source".

Originally posted by Silent Master
Or taking Biden/his campaign's word without doing an independent investigation.

It is a good thing he ordered all of the records opened, and Reade immediately retracted her statement that she filed a complaint then, isn't it?

Originally posted by cdtm
There was a retraction.

A biased source does not make the article a lie.

Would you let someone charged with a crime investigate that crime? Try and think a little bit.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is a good thing he ordered all of the records opened, and Reade immediately retracted her statement that she filed a complaint then, isn't it?

He didn't order all the records open, why lie?

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah I was gonna shut Adam down there but I figured you should get to do the honors. I wonder if he even read the article or just read the title. But wait he couldn't have read the article because he'd have known there was a retraction.

I swear if a place like The Daily Wire told these folk the sky is blue they'd be like "lol yeah right, alt right news source".

LOL at you thinking you have ever shut anything down.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is a good thing he ordered all of the records opened, and Reade immediately retracted her statement that she filed a complaint then, isn't it?

Lol senate rejected his request, as I'm sure this man involved in government for decades knew they would.

But you tried 🙂