New York City vs London

Started by cdtm3 pages

New York City vs London

Pros and cons of both?

I hear NY is always in Londons shadow.

London is the greatest city on Earth. New York is the second greatest city on Earth.

nyc laughs at these ridiculous assertions. lovely ferris wheel you have, tho 🙂

Haven't been to either. I'd prefer visiting London though.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nyc laughs at these ridiculous assertions. lovely ferris wheel you have, tho 🙂
😂+ our 2000 years of history

Originally posted by Robtard
Haven't been to either. I'd prefer visiting London though.
you know it makes sense, New York is great though.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
😂+ our 2000 years of history

right, but that applies to all of europe. why should I decide london instead of madrid or florence

Originally posted by Robtard
Haven't been to either. I'd prefer visiting London though.

Used to travel there all the time. Child model, which was all the rage back in my childhood.

I still have magazines with advertisements of me being on top of giant sized 2600 cartridges with a bunch of other kids (Of course in reality I was in a high chair in a room alone, a fan in my face, and they edited me in. I never let my jealous sister know it though.)

Yeah, it was fun to visit, but the crowd rush's man.. For a kid, you felt like you were gonna be run down. I'd move out of the way, they would do the same at the exact same time, and we'd go back and forth like that.

Been to Florence, was nice. Summer of 1998.

Was about to go West to Madrid after driving through most of Italy, then my stupid ass girlfriend said we should go East to Salzburg instead because her friend's dad said it was a great city to visit. It was just okay.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
right, but that applies to all of europe. why should I decide london instead of madrid or florence
London is bigger and has more going on than Madrid.

half of manhatten is bigger than london, and there's 4 more boroughs.

in fact the topic should have been manhattan vs london. this isnt even fair

Originally posted by Robtard
Been to Florence, was nice. Summer of 1998.

Was about to go West to Madrid after driving through most of Italy, then my stupid ass girlfriend said we should go East to Salzburg instead because her friend's dad said it was a great city to visit. It was just okay.

Florence is great, as is Madrid, but they will never be the giant cityscape that was centre to the greatest empire in Human History. They will never have Wembley Stadium, the tower of london, tower bridge, st Paul's Cathedral etc.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Florence is great, as is Madrid, but they will never be the giant cityscape that was centre to the greatest empire in Human History. They will never have Wembley Stadium, the tower of london, tower bridge, st Paul's Cathedral etc.

Can't speak in regards to London other than I really want to visit.

Drove North starting from Naples, zigzagging all the way up the boot.

Genoa was great too, but only because we didn't realize (and we should have) that a port-town meant that when the sun went done the whores came out and they came out in the hundreds, some wearing virtually nothing. We also accidentally stayed in a hotel room meant to be charged by the hour. Had really good steamed mussels in garlic though there, overlooking the ocean that night. Plus all the whores. So many whores Whirls.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
half of manhatten is bigger than london, and there's 4 more boroughs.

in fact the topic should have been manhattan vs london. this isnt even fair

london is many boroughs when people talk about london they mean greater london.

i'm just having a giggle anyway. i'd love to visit london as well as madrid and florence. but if we're talking size, nyc is mandingo

And Bash loves him some BBC...

I don't particularly love either. I like both. Fish and Chips are obviously best in London but NYC had amazing fish and chips near Times Square (second best I ever had).

Houston has definitely been a far more enjoyable experience than any times I visited NYC or London.

Can't be the subway convenience in NYC, though. The "Tube" is not as awesome as NYCs subway stuff.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
half of manhatten is bigger than london, and there's 4 more boroughs.

in fact the topic should have been manhattan vs london. this isnt even fair

https://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-city-vs-london-comparison-2015-5 have a look at the size section bash.

Originally posted by Robtard
And Bash loves him some BBC...

Your comment is funny because you mean big black c*cks but it is a play on the British Broadcasting Corporation and we are discussing the UK in this thread making your pun quite topical.

haha!

Originally posted by dadudemon
Your comment is funny because you mean big black c*cks but it is a play on the British Broadcasting Corporation and we are discussing the UK in this thread making your pun quite topical.

haha!

yeah Rob is a funny ****er in the best way! 👆