Originally posted by dadudemon
When the story is summarized like that, yes, it seems much worse.But when summarized honestly, this is how it should read:
Two white men, a father and son pair, are whipped up into a vigilante frenzy trying to detain a burglar that was just caught in the act, who likely stole thousands of dollars of equipment which included a hand gun in previous burglaries. The father and son end up killing the 25 year old when trying to confront him when the man attacks them. 3 or more videos existed in the prosecutor department's hands prior to one of the edited videos being made public including that showed the 25 year old man shot and collapse. The video was released on purpose by the man's family's lawyer because the case wasn't getting traction and was passing from prosecutor to prosecutor. However, this stunt may cause harm to prosecution because it taints the jury selection process. It is unknown if the father and son pair were justified with "first hand knowledge" to pursue the young man in their truck. Evidence points to a no.
But that's adding in lots of details that frames the situation and few people want to think about the facts and how difficult this case is.
Good lord... that was literal fanfic in defense of two racist murderers. Arbery was not a "burglar caught in the act", nor was he the aggressor.
Originally posted by Surturoh, how this thread turned out... this thread shows the Alt right mind like few others left from the Dark times leading up to Jan 6 2021.
So yeah, you're pretty convinced the motivation was racism, but you're totally acknowledging the(slim in your mind) possiblity it was not.That about right bro?
Originally posted by Surturhttps://www.11alive.com/article/news/crime/ahmaud-arbery/ahmaud-arbrery-murder-hate-crimes-trial-racist-texts-posts/85-858b1378-4acb-4b47-9154-8b955038fc04 the racist texts are nothing to the posts of the usual suspects in this thread.
Wasn't cold blood, there was a confrontation. Apparently at one point the guy had run up to their car and run away.I'm not saying he deserved to die or that these guys were right, but the narrative of "these whiteys just wanted to kill them a negro!" seems false.
Surt was just regurgitating Tim Pool there again with the expected spinning that if a Black man is killed by a White guy, then the Black guy had to have done something.
DDM later took it further with his fanfic spinning that Arbery was both a burglar caught in the act and the aggressor. Both claims were proven wrong in court and why the two murdering; now admitted racist are now in prison.
Originally posted by dadudemon
When the story is summarized like that, yes, it seems much worse.But when summarized honestly, this is how it should read:
Two white men, a father and son pair, are whipped up into a vigilante frenzy trying to detain a burglar that was just caught in the act, who likely stole thousands of dollars of equipment which included a hand gun in previous burglaries. The father and son end up killing the 25 year old when trying to confront him when the man attacks them. 3 or more videos existed in the prosecutor department's hands prior to one of the edited videos being made public including that showed the 25 year old man shot and collapse. The video was released on purpose by the man's family's lawyer because the case wasn't getting traction and was passing from prosecutor to prosecutor. However, this stunt may cause harm to prosecution because it taints the jury selection process. It is unknown if the father and son pair were justified with "first hand knowledge" to pursue the young man in their truck. Evidence points to a no.
But that's adding in lots of details that frames the situation and few people want to think about the facts and how difficult this case is.
Arnbery wasn't caught in the act, there was no proof that he had priviosuly stolen the McMichael's handgun. Arbery was not the aggressor in the confrontation. The McMichaels had no "first hand knowledge", the homeowner went on record.
DDM literally invented all the above to make Arbery look at fault
Originally posted by RobtardYup and from the very pleasant and balanced mod responses were spamming the report button about me in this and the other thread. Fortunately the mods here are not nasty or stupid people.
Surt was just regurgitating Tim Pool there again with the expected spinning that if a Black man is killed by a White guy, then the Black guy had to have done something.DDM later took it further with his fanfic spinning that Arbery was both a burglar caught in the act and the aggressor. Both claims were proven wrong in court and why the two murdering; now admitted racist are now in prison.
Arnbery wasn't caught in the act, there was no proof that he had priviosuly stolen the McMichael's handgun. Arbery was not the aggressor in the confrontation. The McMichaels had no "first hand knowledge", the homeowner went on record.
DDM literally invented all the above to make Arbery look at fault