Originally posted by Surtur
Lol clown: one side has feelings and nothing else. The other side has video and audio evidence to go against the racist narrative(and no I won't be posting it again because it has already been posted). Just stop. You lost.
so you have no real evidence, only conjecture. noted
Originally posted by Surtur
Lawyers For Gregory McMichael: Public ‘Narrative’ For Arbery Case Based On ‘Incomplete Set Of Facts’No shit Sherlock
I read this whole article and it seems like the McMichael's lawyers are asking the public to calm down and let the trial play out.
Also, I didn't know a 3rd prosecutor passed along the case. They were so conflicted that they wanted a grand jury to review the case to see if it should proceed.
Hence, where we are, now.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
also nobody was recorded saying the n-word, so it's an open and shut case
You can't help yourself from making a strawman even within in minutes:
Originally posted by dadudemon
...he didn't use racist terms or even hint at racist terms.
I figured out how to solve the world's renewable energy crisis: we can burn all the strawmans you make all the time. It's a near infinite supply. Just incessant production. Elon Musk is definitely jealous of your manufacturing standards.
full quote
Originally posted by dadudemon
We have the son's 911 call from a week-ish prior where they caught someone who looked like Arbery (medium height, thin, black, clean shaven) and he didn't use racist terms or even hint at racist terms.I think in this case, it really isn't about race. They were just tired of all the break-ins.
you drew your conclusion by the lack of racist terminology in a 911 call.
you. did. exactly. that. clown.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
full quoteyou drew your conclusion by the lack of racist terminology in a 911 call.
you. did. exactly. that. clown.
Nope, you're not going to get away with this blatant strawman:
Originally posted by dadudemon
..he didn't use racist terms or even hint at racist terms.
Try again. Come back to the topic when you can calmly engage in conversation without having to strawman everything you read.
Originally posted by dadudemonYou're right DDM,
You sure like to talk about it a lot for someone who wants to drop it. 😕There's no neutrality in this scenario.
I don't believe either.
Do you suggest I should not reply when I am told I have only suggested you and your friends stop? When in fact I have suggested time and time again to Bash and Stringer they should also?
I think my position is quite clear and i hope you notice i always say accusations and never regurgitate said accusations because they are distasteful in both directions
Originally posted by Eon Blue
Stating that a certain food is for a certain body type when in reality, no food is objectively meant for any “type”of person.
Parfaits have little nutritional value and are loaded with sugar. In fact, they have more sugar than many desserts. And they are marketed as a breakfast food. If people are eating parfaits, they are not thin, or they will not be for long. Hence, they are for fat people.
Originally posted by Eon Blue
Looks like Bashar is going on full foolish repeat mode now. They guy is literally like a broken record. I’d kick him in the nose if I ever saw him.
This is sure to get the Hangouts gang to accept you. You are not like the other gender nonconforming people they relentlessly mock. I am sure everyone is really impressed with threats of violence from a 90 lb. halfling. You are pathetic.
i like parfaits. granted i make my own and don't get them from mcdonalds, but i assure you i am quite thin
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
This is sure to get the Hangouts gang to accept you. You are not like the other gender nonconforming people they relentlessly mock. I am sure everyone is really impressed with threats of violence from a 90 lb. halfling. You are pathetic.
he just talks big. pay yappy-trap no mind. i'm still not sure if he's being for-real and wishing for someone to slap the weave off his head, tbh. it might be simple kayfabe and tomfooolery
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
hangouts team assistance will help prove that conjecture from dodgy sources is actually real evidence.also nobody was recorded saying the n-word, so it's an open and shut case
Lol you just can't accept the fact there is more evidence they thought this was a thief than there is they had a racial motive.
Originally posted by dadudemon
We have the son's 911 call from a week-ish prior where they caught someone who looked like Arbery (medium height, thin, black, clean shaven) and he didn't use racist terms or even hint at racist terms.I think in this case, it really isn't about race. They were just tired of all the break-ins.
If a white person is tired of break-ins, he gets to murder any black person that resembles the intruder with impunity?
He does not need 100% proof that the suspect is in fact the perpetrator, but others need 100% proof he has implicit racial biases or that his actions were even partially racially-motivated?
The basis for his actions is effectively 1.) black people look alike, and 2.) white people are justified in shooting them if they do not comply with orders, even if it is not in defense of person or property, and even if they are unarmed and pose no threat.
Originally posted by Adam_PoESolid take on the argument DDM is propagating.
If a white person is tired of break-ins, he gets to murder any black person that resembles the intruder with impunity?He does not need 100% proof that the suspect is in fact the perpetrator, but others need 100% proof he has implicit racial biases or that his actions were even partially racially-motivated?
The basis for his actions is effectively 1.) black people look alike, and 2.) white people are justified in shooting them if they do not comply with orders, even if it is not in defense of person or property, and even if they are unarmed and pose no threat.