Originally posted by dadudemon
Court of law, yes: innocent until proven guilty.This is real life. Burden of proof does not exist contrary to what the internet psuedo-intellectuals claim. "You can't prove a negative!" Yes you can it is complete and utter bullshit to you can't. Lots of science is done to prove a negative - all the damn time.
If they posted racist shit: likely racist.
If they didn't: likely not.
Both of you would be looking at the same set of data. How hard is it to look at it and prove your side of the case?
Rob is making the claim it is racism, why do I have to prove a thing? But I DID try to look up articles from non-conservative leaning websites and found no mentions of "they made this racist social media post" or anything.
That is the most I'm willing to do, he's lucky I did even that given he made the claim.
Originally posted by Surtur
To be fair you came in saying he characterized it correctly and for that to be true would mean racism as a motivation was proven, but you seem to acknowledge it has not been.
Characterized it correctly as another George Zimmerman vs. Treyvon Martin case, yes. I was explicit with what I meant by him characterizing it correctly.
And new evidence came out years later that Zimmerman is probably racist against black people. 😐
Originally posted by Surtur
So...he didn't characterize it correctly. It's like if he took a test and got half the questions right. That is more apt a comparison IMO.
Seems like he did. But I didn't talk about the racism stuff: only the Z v T comparison and Z acting like a "hero" getting the thief.
Originally posted by Surtur
And you know I'm lazy but I sought out articles from NPR and CBS and CNN and found no proof of racism. I'm not doing more than that, Rob can do the rest of the work to prove his claim.
You could if you wanted. 🙂
Everyone can. I don't want to touch the profiles because there is an active investigation and my deets would show up in the logs. I ain't getting involved in that shit, yo!
Okay but I feel like if he says they are racist...show it.
And we both know the media are hunting for any evidence like a tiger who has been starved for a week and then let loose in a deer sanctuary.
This shit would be plastered all over if they had any evidence other than "well, they are white and he is black".
Originally posted by dadudemon
Characterized it correctly as another George Zimmerman vs. Treyvon Martin case, yes. I was explicit with what I meant by him characterizing it correctly.And new evidence came out years later that Zimmerman is probably racist against black people. 😐
Seems like he did. But I didn't talk about the racism stuff: only the Z v T comparison and Z acting like a "hero" getting the thief.
You could if you wanted. 🙂
Everyone can. I don't want to touch the profiles because there is an active investigation and my deets would show up in the logs. I ain't getting involved in that shit, yo!
Apparently people think George Zimmeran, a brown man, is somehow a white racist man...
Originally posted by Robtard
I was still correct.I love how you compared me on a message board to the sway of the POTUS. Good stuff, Trumpet.
Take the loss against them, for once.
7 is not close enough to 9 to say it was a typo. Not even on the 10-key.
It was just you exaggerating but getting into the actual numbers, yes, white men voted for Trump in a very overwhelming majority at roughly 80%.
Originally posted by Surtur
Okay but I feel like if he says they are racist...show it.And we both know the media are hunting for any evidence like a tiger who has been starved for a week and then let loose in a deer sanctuary.
This shit would be plastered all over if they had any evidence other than "well, they are white and he is black".
True.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Take the loss against them, for once.7 is not close enough to 9 to say it was a typo. Not even on the 10-key.
It was just you exaggerating but getting into the actual numbers, yes, white men voted for Trump in a very overwhelming majority at roughly 80%.
Fat fingered.
Yes, I posted the numbers
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Apparently people think George Zimmeran, a brown man, is somehow a white racist man...
Latino.
People liked to point out he was half white, half black. But most Latino's are mestizos which is part Native American, part European so it's just easier to say Z was Latino, right?
Dishonestly saying he was white, like the media did, is super terrible. And not posting his face that was clearly beaten by Treyvon was also dishonest of the media. It solidified the type of world we live in with our media.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Take the loss against them, for once.7 is not close enough to 9 to say it was a typo. Not even on the 10-key.
It was just you exaggerating but getting into the actual numbers, yes, white men voted for Trump in a very overwhelming majority at roughly 80%.
Plus the exit poll says 80%, not 78.27%. 78.27 isn't anywhere on the pic he posted or on CNN.