The murder of Ahmaud Arbery/All three perpetrators found guilty

Started by Surtur123 pages
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
same here.

I'm still waiting for proof of racial motivation.

...Which I never claimed.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I attributed an argument to you that you did not make, now defend it or I win!

looks like Adam was right again. what a shocking plot twist

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
...Which I never claimed.

Nor did you ask those claiming it for evidence. Why not?

I will be nice and if you say you never saw a single person in here attribute these acts to racism I will totally believe you Bash 🙂

I can see you're not interested in backing your claim and are chickening out with your standard deflection games, so let's just move on. Im not going to defend a position which I never claimed.

Originally posted by Surtur
I will be nice and if you say you never saw a single person in here attribute these acts to racism I will totally believe you Bash 🙂

LoL. The thread title itself totally contradicts that no one claimed this was racially-motivated.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I can see you're not interested in backing your claim and are chickening out with your standard deflection games, so let's just move on. Im not going to defend a position which I never claimed.

My claim is this: you never asked those claiming this was racist for proof.

Why not?

Originally posted by Surtur
Nope, we know for a fact the cops reached out to them for help.
you have proof of this from a reputable source, because I'm waiting for proof of thefts.

Originally posted by Surtur
My claim is this: you never asked those claiming this was racist for proof.

Why not?

ad hominem accusations to avoid substantiating your claim that there is proof of a "rash" of recent break-ins, all but one reported? okay, have fun with that

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
you have proof of this from a reputable source, because I'm waiting for proof of thefts.

Been posted already.

so your empty claims are valid evidence?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
ad hominem accusations to avoid substantiating your claim that there is proof of a "rash" of recent break-ins, all but one reported? okay, have fun with that

Been posted already.

One more time: why have you not also asked people to prove claims of racism?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so your empty claims are valid evidence?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
so your empty claims are valid evidence?

No, posted video link.

Why have you never asked for proof of racism as a motive?

transpassing on a construction site and theft are not the same thing.

Just loving that the racism narrative is no more. Cops got these people involved.

back to pretend-winning for your own desperate narrative? good thing you're not on the jury

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
back to pretend-winning for your own desperate narrative? good thing you're not on the jury

If you're saying the racism narrative is still viable please explain how.

All signs are now pointing at the cops for not doing their jobs and enlisting civilians to help.

i never made that claim. I'll leave that to the jury. have fun victory crowing over nothing, and avoiding having to substantiate your own claims

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i never made that claim. I'll leave that to the jury. have fun victory crowing over nothing, and avoiding having to substantiate your own claims

Okay it's a win for me if the narrative that this was a racist cold blooded murder falls apart. That is the narrative I have come out against.

For you to say it's a pretend win would seem to suggest you feel that isn't the case and that somehow the case for a racist motive hasn't fallen apart.

Guy had problems as a police officer, so it was quite irresponsible for cops to enlist his help once he was no longer on the force. *That* should be the narrative now.