Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I can see you're not interested in backing your claim and are chickening out with your standard deflection games, so let's just move on. Im not going to defend a position which I never claimed.
My claim is this: you never asked those claiming this was racist for proof.
Why not?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i never made that claim. I'll leave that to the jury. have fun victory crowing over nothing, and avoiding having to substantiate your own claims
Okay it's a win for me if the narrative that this was a racist cold blooded murder falls apart. That is the narrative I have come out against.
For you to say it's a pretend win would seem to suggest you feel that isn't the case and that somehow the case for a racist motive hasn't fallen apart.
Guy had problems as a police officer, so it was quite irresponsible for cops to enlist his help once he was no longer on the force. *That* should be the narrative now.