no morals flash vs no morals Superman v Diana

Originally posted by JBL
Two Superman fans agreeing with each other. Smfh. I want the both of you to show attosecond anything stated in that moon rebuilding scan. I don't want phils ( another Superman fan) math. I don't want h1 ( another Superman fan) math. I don't want supermans fans guessing or sugar coating. I don't want any other scans. We are talking about the moon rebuilding. Show us all from the comic and feat itself where it's stated attosecond in ANYTHING IR SHUT UP.

So what is your logic?

That Superman rebuilt the moon in years? Months? Days? What does your reasoning and logic tell you?

Originally posted by JBL
It was stated IN THE BOOK that flash evacuating that city was just under light speed. I don't care what you bias Superman fans calculated with your real-life math, the book said JUST UNDER LIGHT SPEED. That's ALL we need. But you Superman or should I say DC bias fans want to take over the writers book and insert your own speed for the sake of DC bias.

This guy trying to change the topic. SMH

Originally posted by Diesldude
In your view, How long did it take to rebuild the moon?

Answer the question or your moobs are as bad as the actual JBL's was.

How long did it take?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So what is your logic?

That Superman rebuilt the moon in years? Months? Days? What does your reasoning and logic tell you?

Originally posted by CosmicComet
Answer the question or your moobs are as bad as the actual JBL's was.

How long did it take?

Originally posted by JBL
Go ask Phil or H1 to use their real life math to make it as fast as possible, you Superman fans Love and accept that for obvious reasons. To fans with common sense and reading comprehension, it was fast but nowhere as fast as you bias fans claim. The word attosecond was put in by fans. No quantifiable time limit was given. Live with it.

Unless the narration states the exact number for speed, maths/physics is the best way to analyse it (usually, from the distance traveled and time). In cases where the narration contradicts either itself or what's shown on panel the feat remains ambiguous. Luckily, there are no such contradictions present in Superman's moon rebuilding feat.

Originally posted by JBL
How long did it state in the comic did it take him? Don't ask me. I'm not adding or subtracting anything from the feat

I’ve already stated the amount of time it took imo. Why don’t you try to do the same?

Oh you gotta wait for your 5 year old son to finish with his homeschooling before he can tell you what to write. Got it. 👆

Originally posted by JBL
I don't care if he did it a million times faster than a attosecond. I'm asking where did you and others get attosecond from in anything related to that feat. Cause real life fan math won't cut it.

Because the comic didn't show him taking years or months or days or even hours.

He did it in the time it took him to have a normal speed conversation with Batman. No adding, no subtracting, it is literally shown in the comic.

And as I said before, him having a normal speed conversation doesn't mean his hands etc can't move at a different speed. Humans do it all the time - look at any good guitarist/lead singer, or drummer/singer.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Because the comic didn't show him taking years or months or days or even hours.

He did it in the time it took him to have a normal speed conversation with Batman. No adding, no subtracting, it is literally shown in the comic.

And as I said before, him having a normal speed conversation doesn't mean his hands etc can't move at a different speed. Humans do it all the time - look at any good guitarist/lead singer, or drummer/singer.

He wasn’t aware of this and was waiting for his son to help check with the dc writer he’s friends with.

Originally posted by Magnon
As I said, math is heck of a lot better way to analyse speed feats than your incompetent, unfounded and extremely biased opinions. 👆

Unless the narration states the exact number for speed, maths/physics is the best way to analyse it (usually, from the distance traveled and time). In cases where the narration contradicts either itself or what's shown on panel the feat remains ambiguous. Luckily, there are no such contradictions present in Superman's moon rebuilding feat.

Originally posted by JBL
Real life math and physics DO NOT WORK FOR A COMIC BOOK FEAT. If we apply real life math and physics to comics, then 99 percent of the heros and villains would not be able to do what they do.

Then do you not use logic and reasoning then? Do you just read the comic and go yes, Superman rebuilt the moon over hundreds of years?

😂 Superman rebuilding that moon is no doubt superman's greatest speed feat

I'll calc it sometime in the future but the speed at which he done so is def insane

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Then do you not use logic and reasoning then? Do you just read the comic and go yes, Superman rebuilt the moon over hundreds of years?

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 Superman rebuilding that moon is no doubt superman's greatest speed feat

I'll calc it sometime in the future but the speed at which he done so is def insane

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 Superman rebuilding that moon is no doubt superman's greatest speed feat

I'll calc it sometime in the future but the speed at which he done so is def insane

Need a link to Phil’s post? You’ll need to change some words around but make sure the formulas are copied exactly or your calculations won’t come out right.

Originally posted by JBL
Did it state in the book that it took him over a hundred years?

Originally posted by JBL
Did it state in the book that it took him over a hundred years?

So what's your reasoning?

The book shows that he did it in the time it took to have a conversation with Batman.

Originally posted by Diesldude
why are you evading the question?

@diesl

um no lol I already did one on his recent chains feat, it's a lowball calc though