Poll
90%
10%
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/The_World_Forger
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Doctor_Manhattan
Powers and Stats
Tier: Low 1-CName: Doctor Jonathan Osterman, Doctor Manhattan
Powers and Stats
Tier: 2-A | 1-AName: Alpheus, World Forger
Originally posted by cdtm
As soon as it goes against a character I like. 👆
no, I'm a avid member of vsbattles
their tiering system is extremely flawed, because dimensional tiering is bulls, and their inter companies power scale is out of whack
phoenix force and in-betweener are both only universal
yet vsbattles view them as low-1A,
unless you think phoenix force or in betweener are more powerful than fifth dimensional imps like mxy
Originally posted by MrMind
no, I'm a avid member of vsbattlestheir tiering system is extremely flawed, because dimensional tiering is bulls, and their inter companies power scale is out of whack
phoenix force and in-betweener are both only universal
yet vsbattles view them as low-1A,
unless you think phoenix force or in betweener are more powerful than fifth dimensional imps like mxy
And One Above All is 1A.
Which is hilarious.
Originally posted by cdtm
And One Above All is 1A.Which is [b]hilarious
. [/B]
that one is accurate, Presence is High 1-A obviously >>>TOAA, Marvel max out at 1-A
DC max out at tier 0 (the writer)
and DC 1-A is on a much higher scale than marvel 1-A, the general consensus is Lucifer alone > TOAA, due to superior cosmology, most of DC 1-A can solo marvel since they are above TOAA and Regulator Thanos
which I agree with
Originally posted by MrMind
no, I'm a avid member of vsbattlestheir tiering system is extremely flawed, because dimensional tiering is bulls, and their inter companies power scale is out of whack
phoenix force and in-betweener are both only universal
yet vsbattles view them as low-1A,
unless you think phoenix force or in betweener are more powerful than fifth dimensional imps like mxy
How is dimensional tiering bs exactly?
That's exactly what you are using to reference these 1A ratings.
Their specifics ratings of certain characters may not always be great but the tiering system itself is sound.
Originally posted by CosmicComet
How is dimensional tiering bs exactly?That's exactly what you are using to reference these 1A ratings.
Their specifics ratings of certain characters may not always be great but the tiering system itself is sound.
do you think average monitor can be 1-A?
yet fifth dimensional imps are only 1-C?
Mxy or Batmite has multiversal feats, even imps like qwsp can manipulate hypertime at will, average monitor doesn't have any feats whatsoever
and phoenix or in-betweener being low 1-A
give me one feat from in-betweener that's even beyond universal, let alone multiversal/hyperversal
they rate rune king thor beyond multiversal, rune king thor has no feats to suggest he's even universal
their power scaling are often not backed by feats.
not saying it's all wrong, a lot of it I agree with, but the tiering definitely has some fatal flaws.
Wanda is retconned to global level on panel, yet they still think wanda is multiversal to hyperversal
a lot of popular characters are overwanked
Originally posted by CosmicComet
How is dimensional tiering bs exactly?That's exactly what you are using to reference these 1A ratings.
Their specifics ratings of certain characters may not always be great but the tiering system itself is sound.
How is Tier 0 vs 1A sound at all?
Even Vsbattles can't explain the difference, and they own the term.
You have posters there claiming Tier 0 and 1A are basically the same exact thing.
Originally posted by MrMind
do you think average monitor can be 1-A?yet fifth dimensional imps are only 1-C?
Mxy or Batmite has multiversal feats, even imps like qwsp can manipulate hypertime at will, average monitor doesn't have any feats whatsoever
and phoenix or in-betweener being low 1-A
give me one feat from in-betweener that's even beyond universal, let alone multiversal/hyperversal
they rate rune king thor beyond multiversal, rune king thor has no feats to suggest he's even universal
their power scaling are often not backed by feats.
not saying it's all wrong, a lot of it I agree with, but the tiering definitely has some fatal flaws.
Wanda is retconned to global level on panel, yet they still think wanda is multiversal to hyperversal
a lot of popular characters are overwanked
I've seen posts where they come out and say "Feats, shmeats, here's what this writer said".
All the things you aren't supposed to do on comic boards, they totally do. Writers word, bios, publishers word, you name it.
Originally posted by cdtm
How is Tier 0 vs 1A sound at all?Even [b]Vsbattles
can't explain the difference, and they own the term.You have posters there claiming Tier 0 and 1A are basically the same exact thing. [/B]
do you agree Presence/Overvoid/Source are higher tier than TOAA (especially after retcon)?
I personally think the downgrade of TOAA is very sensible
Originally posted by CosmicComet
Again that's their specific ratings of some characters.Phoenix at 1A is laughable.
Just talking about dimensional tiering as a system, not ratings.
it's not really correct on scale
for example inter company size comparison in relation to dimension tiering within the verse.
I'll expand on it a little later