Poll
100%
0%
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
What about option 3, not enough evidence was discovered but there was evidence and trump was not exonerated.
Well, yes stupid people could vote for that. Unintelligent yes, but it would be their right. Just like someone has the right to say the earth is flat.
Can't imagine who here would be so dumb as to choose such an option. Any ideas?
Mr Mueller also reiterated that the special counsel team had found evidence that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 US election with the aim intention of benefiting then-candidate Trump.
Neither the rejection of Mr Trump's claim to have been exonerated nor the confirmation of Russian efforts to benefit Mr Trump were new revelations, but the power of having Mr Mueller state them categorically under oath represented early successes for the Democratic committee members.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49100778
In the history of the United States a prosecutor has never exonerated the person they are investigating.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49100778
Oh I agree it wasn't Muellers job to exonerate so anyone who acts like him not being exonerated is a win isn't very bright and doesn't understand the role of a prosecutor.
Thank god you're not one of those people 👆
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Mr Mueller also reiterated that the special counsel team had found evidence that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 US election with the aim intention of benefiting then-candidate Trump.Neither the rejection of Mr Trump's claim to have been exonerated nor the confirmation of Russian efforts to benefit Mr Trump were new revelations, but the power of having Mr Mueller state them categorically under oath represented early successes for the Democratic committee members.
You are light on facts and knowledge on our legal system. A prosecutor job is never to exonerate their target.
It’s to charge or not charge. If no charges are filed. That’s it.
Do you understand?
Both the Russian and US presidents had poured scorn on suggestions of "collusion", with Mr Trump calling it "the greatest political witch hunt in history".
What contact do we know about?
At least 17 Trump associates had contacts with Russians or Wikileaks, which released hacked documents, during the campaign or transition, according to an analysis of public records by the New York Times , with at least 100 face-to-face interactions, phone calls or electronic messages with Russians or Kremlin-linked figures and at least 51 individual communications.
Trump aides known to have had contact with Russians include the president's son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner, his son Donald Trump Jr, former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and former personal lawyer Michael Cohen.
Who's who in the drama to end all dramas?
The president's supporters point out that interactions with foreign nationals are routine during any White House campaign, but three Trump associates have now admitted lying about these encounters.
Who's been charged?
The special counsel has indicted more than 30 people, including four members of Mr Trump's campaign team or administration, an adviser and long-time ally, and 26 Russians, as well as three Russian companies.
Time will tell when he is not President...