Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Blue Marvel is a pretty sad character.He's a cheap blaxploitation character, who is getting shoved down our throats the exact same way Sentry did.
He was created in 2008.
They want us to believe he's been a major player since 1950.
Sorry, it doesn't work like this. He has to earn our respect.
It's like the comic book equivalent of euhemerization. Pretty cheap shit imo
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
So he is a "blast from the past"...... but Blue Marvel (2008) is too fresh?
Same with Hickman's Hyperion, who appeared in 2013?
By our (rather special) standards, they are all old.
Hey, I wasn't suggesting anything; Edwards was just the one name I didn't recognise was all.
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
The protagonist of Resident Evil 7. I think. 👆
Never played it. Won't either.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Hey, I wasn't suggesting anything; Edwards was just the one name I didn't recognise was all.
I figured.
I was surprised to see some downplay him because of the team he steamrolled.
As if Iron Man or Wolverine didn't have any "solo" showings against Superman copies.
The team Ethan stomped was by no means weak. It's ridiculous to assume so, especially since we like to focus on feats here, and few have better feats than Wolverine & Spidey... & Cap... & Iron Man...
We want to discuss handbook stats, we should do it somewhere else.
---
Merged Sentry and Amped Namor, maybe they could compare.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Blue Marvel is a pretty sad character.He's a cheap blaxploitation character, who is getting shoved down our throats the exact same way Sentry did.
He was created in 2008.
They want us to believe he's been a major player since 1950.
Sorry, it doesn't work like this. He has to earn our respect.
He was written as having retired in 1962. Thus, they want us to believe that he was active in the 50s but not "since". And the very limited number of appearances doesn't really equate to shoving him down our throats. The only established writer to push him is Ewing.
And I am curious as to how a conservative, patriotic, veteran, elderly genius professor equates to blaxploitation. Cage is a blaxploitation character. BM is a generic character who is far from the blaxploitation stereotype.
But what does any of this have to do with his power and formidability?
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Why are you asking for BM's low showings Stoic?Let's assume he doesn't have any. What would that mean?
Claims were made, back them up. BM was shown to be elite top tier.
Pagan was shown to be capable of taking down a high herald in Thor. BM took Pagan down alone. Hulkster posted scans of Pagan that were all but phucking ignored by what appears to be a disease that hit this forum. Superman without a sun dip would lose to this team. If not he should remain banned from forum discussion because nothing can apparently defeat him, even though that is not what is portrayed in comics.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
No, it wasn't. It was Earth-58163.Wolverine has destroyed Nick Fury in every canon encounter they have ever had.
Even when Fury had a one-sided prep.
But you haven't pointed out any of his lows yet.
You mentioned a non-canon showing [b]and
lied about it. Made a habit out of it, too.Now since you see pencils everywhere, go and shove one up your dickhole or something. [/B]
Nick Fury, do you recall the scene idiot? Simple question.