Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Pull your head out of your ass why don't you? They weren't traitors. They were defending their homes, families, and lands from invaders. Most of those who fought for the South didn't give a damn about slavery because only a tiny percentage of them actually owned slaves.I'm so sorry you've had the wool pulled over your eyes your whole pathetic life by those who want to control you and use you.
The Confederates were traitors to America, star/fly.
Let me put it in a scenario that's digestible to you: Imagine the Confederates were all brown skinned Muslims, there you go; now you see it. Same scenario, but imagine it was "Commander Muhammad ibn Abd al-Lee" instead.
Originally posted by SquallX
Do you even know why the Civil War even happened?Key point. Slavery had nothing to do with it.
Originally posted by StyleTime
Nah, it was definitely about slaves. "State's rights" was just the only acceptable way to present it, and there was a concerted effort by the Post-War South to make sure that they didn't come off racist as **** for fighting a war to keep slaves.
Bingo.
What's worst, the very small minority of Confederates were wealthy enough to own slaves, but they convinced close to a million useful idiots to take up arms against their own country to defend the wealth of the few.
Originally posted by RobtardBingo!👆
The Confederates were traitors to America, star/fly.Let me put it in a scenario that's digestible to you: Imagine the Confederates were all brown skinned Muslims, there you go; now you see it. Same scenario, but imagine it was "Commander Muhammad ibn Abd al-Lee" instead.
Originally posted by StyleTimeBingo 👆
Nah, it was definitely about slaves. "State's rights" was just the only acceptable way to present it, and there was a concerted effort by the Post-War South to make sure that they didn't come off racist as **** for fighting a war to keep slaves.
Originally posted by RobtardBingo! 👆
Bingo.What's worst, the very small minority of Confederates were wealthy enough to own slaves, but they convinced close to a million useful idiots to take up arms against their own country to defend the wealth of the few.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaedurwank
"Bingo her derp."You mean a fellow brainwashed USA-hating leftist thinks exactly like you do?
Shocker. 🙄
You can go shove your "bingo" up your a**, robbie. He's wrong, just as you are. 👆
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaeTraitors who bent the knee in the end. Get over the fact you tried leaving our great nation only to be destroyed by the north. North>south. Not all of them were racists but the civil war destroyed slavery. Now Blm will change systemic racism across the country.
Pull your head out of your ass why don't you? They weren't traitors. They were defending their homes, families, and lands from invaders. Most of those who fought for the South didn't give a damn about slavery because only a tiny percentage of them actually owned slaves.I'm so sorry you've had the wool pulled over your eyes your whole pathetic life by those who want to control you and use you.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Traitors who bent the knee in the end. Get over the fact you tried leaving our great nation only to be destroyed by the north. North>south. Not all of them were racists but the civil war destroyed slavery. Now Blm will change systemic racism across the country.
Star/fly is one of these "The South will rise again!" types it seems.
Originally posted by StyleTime👆
Nah, it was definitely about slaves. "State's rights" was just the only acceptable way to present it, and there was a concerted effort by the Post-War South to make sure that they didn't come off racist as **** for fighting a war to keep slaves.
He is salty the north destroyed them. I always laughed at dummies from the pitiful south holding on to their bitterness and being upset of their inferiority towards the north.
So why now?
If it was o.k. to have the battle flag before, what's happened to suddenly make it not ok?
I mean, I understand exactly why they're doing it. I just don't understand who they're appeasing here, if their entire audience is composed of "racists".
They're a business after all, and I highly doubt they can attract an inclusive audience. Just the rednecks, forever.
Originally posted by StyleTime
Nah, it was definitely about slaves. "State's rights" was just the only acceptable way to present it, and there was a concerted effort by the Post-War South to make sure that they didn't come off racist as **** for fighting a war to keep slaves.
What about the corn whiskey tax?
Wasn't it really all about money, like everything is? With "slave labor" that the South depended on financially being one piece of it, among others?