The GDF Septic Tank (Official Off Topic)

Started by Bashar Teg1,415 pages

Originally posted by Foxsteak
I'll gloss over the details, I was looking to get beer but was ****ed up on drugs so wound up in a place I shouldn't have been.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
I was ****ed up on drugs and wandered into a school. I did not ogle 12 year olds and the police were there to talk to me, but they could tell I was ****ed up.

Schechter wants to add bullshit because he's a troll. Don't you have dadudemon to diagnose you disgusting piece of shit?


Originally posted by Foxsteak
I'm not justifying what I did. Clearly I did something wrong. That's what happens when you're ****ed up on drugs, I guess.

Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
I don't take medication, they know they fcked up! But a get out of jail free card and free money from the gov'ment is okay, I guess.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
The biggest problem is that hebes will do it because everyone else is "doing it" only to later regret it and feel like they made a big mistake.

Girls as young as 13 and 14 engage in sexual activity with older boys all the time. Adam Johnson, a famous footballer, fooled around with a 15 year old and got jailed, yet the girl was initialising most of the thing. I guess this is one instance where the rich don't get that privilege?

remember though, it wasn't his fault AT ALL baby

everyone knows that antipsychotic pills + booze = sudden urge to trespass on grade school property and stalk children with obvious intent to harm, because reasons

Originally posted by Surtur
Or what about when a 14 yr. old or 16 yr. old decide they want to go topless?
Originally posted by It's xyz!
I see nothing wrong with that. 😄
Originally posted by Robtard
Seems like you're still mad cos I called you a degenerate for harassing high school girls. That was like 3 years ago now, probs best if you let it go.
Originally posted by It's xyz!
When did I harass high school girls?
Originally posted by Sancty
They weren't high school girls...
Originally posted by Robtard
Ah, my error, that's right. Good lord.

YouTube video

Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
YouTube video

Oh dear, Piers... facepalm

Where do you find this crap? Piers is 100% spot on about Tommy Robinson. He is a convicted criminal, and he's clearly not an objective journalist on this issue. On the contrary he has a clear agenda to demonise muslims.

Anyone still harping on about "Muslim" grooming gangs 13 years after the criminals were convicted and all enquiries done and recommendations made, clearly couldn't give a donkey's ass about the victims or potential victims who are 10 times more likely to be sexually abused by a white christian man.

By actively searching for it. Confirming the bias.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
[QUOTE=17743778]Originally posted by Surtur
[B]Or what about when a 14 yr. old or 16 yr. old decide they want to go topless?
Originally posted by It's xyz!
I see nothing wrong with that. 😄
[/B][/QUOTE]

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Where do you find this crap? Piers is 100% spot on about Tommy Robinson. He is a convicted criminal, and he's clearly not an objective journalist on this issue. On the contrary he has a clear agenda to demonise muslims.

Anyone still harping on about "Muslim" grooming gangs 13 years after the criminals were convicted and all enquiries done and recommendations made, clearly couldn't give a donkey's ass about the victims or potential victims who are 10 times more likely to be sexually abused by a white christian man.

It went on for over a decade and covered up because the police were scared of looking racist. This should never have happened.

It's still going on, the idea of saying something online being a criminal offense because some dumbass got offended vs. actual child rape being overlooked. Talk about priorities.

Originally posted by Robtard

Speaking of...

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
From my experience, I don't think I'd go beyond 3 years younger. 4 at a stretch.

It seems to be generally acceptable for 5 years to be the norm in the states, purely coz of the growth rate, physically.

-AC

I wonder if he was sexually blackmailing underage girls while he typed that. Such quality people here at kmc

Originally posted by Robtard

Originally posted by walshy
Difference is my gf can legally buy alcohol you future pedo
Originally posted by It's xyz!
Nothing wrong with popping cherries. mmmmm

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Speaking of...

I wonder if he was sexually blackmailing underage girls while he typed that. Such quality people here at kmc

Could be he hadn't yet, but I'm sure it was still in him back in 2005. David Masters, f***ing degenerate.

Originally posted by Piggle Humsy
Ur so needy

This is why nobody likes you

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Yes, I am needy.

I am a victim.

Originally posted by Piggle Humsy
No ur underage victims are the victims

Originally posted by Foxsteak
We've been over this. But take their side. I don't care.

Not all that unusual when professional victims turn out to be the perps.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
The context of the word "their" is referring to you and Robtard trolling.

Clava is the best

Excellent news for all us

Originally posted by FalconPaunch!
It went on for over a decade and covered up because the police were scared of looking racist. This should never have happened.

It's still going on, the idea of saying something online being a criminal offense because some dumbass got offended vs. actual child rape being overlooked. Talk about priorities.

Wth you on about now? Which decade? What's going on now?

Like I said these perpetrators have all been prosecuted over a decade ago. No thanks to Tommy Robsinon who almost caused a mis-trial by rioting outside the court (Proving he couldn't give a damn about the victims). In the meantime 85% of rape cases against children in the UK are white and not muslim. But I get that doesn't fit your right wing narrative pushed by people who are trying to incite hate and violence towards minorities.

By being a "criminal offence to get offended Online" you mean inciting violent riots against mosques.

FACTS:

https://x.com/Fx1Jonny/status/1879122048041242803

https://x.com/nazirafzal/status/1875283908180472092

https://x.com/nazirafzal/status/1876393052446818327

https://x.com/smile2jannah/status/1878139031852052707

https://x.com/smile2jannah/status/1876910149333331980

https://x.com/smile2jannah/status/1876645117194641419

Originally posted by Darth Thor
FACTS:

https://x.com/Fx1Jonny/status/1879122048041242803

https://x.com/nazirafzal/status/1875283908180472092

https://x.com/nazirafzal/status/1876393052446818327

https://x.com/smile2jannah/status/1878139031852052707

https://x.com/smile2jannah/status/1876910149333331980

https://x.com/smile2jannah/status/1876645117194641419

Interesting how the Far-Right provocateurs from Robinson to Musk and on down do not mention that UK White Christians have a higher rate of child sex abuse and grooming offenses than the Asian Muslims. Not a single mention. As you said, facts do not fit the agenda.

Originally posted by Robtard
Interesting how the Far-Right provocateurs from Robinson to Musk and on down do not mention that UK White Christians have a higher rate of child sex abuse and grooming offenses than the Asian Muslims. Not a single mention. As you said, facts do not fit the agenda.

Remember when Musk was liked. Before he decided to get involved in politics.

Narrative was he was real life Tony Stark 😂

Most muslims I know now are going to boycott Tesla. I certainly won't be buying one.