Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!Surt's just trying to deflect away that he's voted for Trump twice now and what that means.
is a democrat candidate posting on reddit? Cool...
Going to be weird if the SC knocks down the ACA on Nov 10th and Surt loses his free insurance because of his own actions. I say weird, no, that's not the right word.
Originally posted by Robtard
Surt's just trying to deflect away that he's voted for Trump twice now and what that means.Going to be weird if the SC knocks down the ACA on Nov 10th and Surt loses his free insurance because of his own actions. I say weird, no, that's not the right word.
Oh son, this is not the road you wanna travel down.
And btw I love how holding you guys to your own standards is always a "deflection".
It must be awesome to literally never hold yourself to account in the way you hold others 👆
Originally posted by RobtardI wonder in reality if Surt uses Insurance, you read between the lines and he has obviously been left some money. He also obviously works, he is also clearly not stupid. This demographic in Chicago would fit with many of his views and explain how he pays for things.
Surt's just trying to deflect away that he's voted for Trump twice now and what that means.Going to be weird if the SC knocks down the ACA on Nov 10th and Surt loses his free insurance because of his own actions. I say weird, no, that's not the right word.
Originally posted by SurturSurt you know very well why you aren't and why you are deflecting. Neither Rob nor I will indulge you in that.
Oh son, this is not the road you wanna travel down.And btw I love how holding you guys to your own standards is always a "deflection".
It must be awesome to literally never hold yourself to account in the way you hold others 👆
Originally posted by Robtard
That makes sense then, if someone violates the EULA by posting something like "All Jews are evil" and someone *likes* it, that user is also violating the EULA.
But that's not what is happening at all.
That's what they say but there's no violation of terms of service when they do this almost 100% of the time. You missed the part about automods autobanning people. They scripted it.
Yes, there are those trolls who try to incite hate but almost none of the bans are due to those very small and almost nonexistent posters. It's just blatant propaganda.
Originally posted by dadudemon
But that's not what is happening at all.That's what they say but there's no violation of terms of service when they do this almost 100% of the time. You missed the part about automods autobanning people. They scripted it.
Yes, there are those trolls who try to incite hate but almost none of the bans are due to those very small and almost nonexistent posters. It's just blatant propaganda.
I'm curious what you think about if Facebook is a publisher. Check the triggered thread for my response to you about what that oversight board is.
Originally posted by SurturSurt, you clearly aren't though, instead, you are using ill-proven accusations in a ludicrous hypothetical situation and comparing them to DDM getting banned for posting his youtoob fringe ideas and some Reddit supporter of the alt-science world getting banned for supporting the fringe toxicity.
You call it a deflection, I call it seeing if you'll apply the rules you have created equally.
Originally posted by cdtm
This is a good way to mobilize a base.Their house, their rules I guess. They'll just end up moving somewhere else.
Didn't use to be that way. There was a significant volume of differing opinions. Now it is mostly the ultra-politically correct, radicalized leftists pushing communism, authoritarian leftism, or socialistic anarchy. The worst of the worst of leftists.
Pictures of meaningless and useless "people of color" get upvoted by tens of thousands. Just some banal caption and they get upvoted. Why? Because the moronic ultra PC idiots think they are super woke by upvoting a non-white person. "OMG! Look how woke I am by loving this! I'm so good!"
Originally posted by dadudemonOr alternatively, the Overton window has started returning to a more middle framing and I have not moved with it and see the centre as the left.
Didn't use to be that way. There was a significant volume of differing opinions. Now it is mostly the ultra-politically correct, radicalized leftists pushing communism, authoritarian leftism, or socialistic anarchy. The worst of the worst of leftists.Pictures of meaningless and useless "people of color" get upvoted by tens of thousands. Just some banal caption and they get upvoted. Why? Because the moronic ultra PC idiots think they are super woke by upvoting a non-white person. "OMG! Look how woke I am by loving this! I'm so good!"
Originally posted by Surtur
I'm curious what you think about if Facebook is a publisher. Check the triggered thread for my response to you about what that oversight board is.
I read it. I have no new comments.
They are all publishers. I've posted this multiple times. They are only moving up the timeline of losing the historic case by making it much more obvious they are directly fit under the legal definition of publisher.