Originally posted by Robtard
I made an error, he corrected me and I basically said "ah, no problem". Should he respond by attacking me? Are you really this retarded and buttmad?
Why project your obvious anger onto me? He didn't need to say anything, but he chose to not only correct you but to portray it as some act of consistency when it wasn't.
That is the only fact I was making known 🙂
fans of the republican second place winner in presidential elections have customarily been given a grace period to mourn in silence, without contempt or mockery.
this custom is rooted in the assumption of a mutual love for our right to choose our leaders. however a substantial portion of republicans are threatening to take that away. that's why 'trumpers' are still getting pissed on. what are your feelings on that, broly?
Originally posted by cdtm
I still think the coup Major General Smedley Butler was talking about actually happened.The infamous "Business Plot" from the 1930's. According to a decorated retired Major General, he was approached by leaders of major industries, to lead a 10,000 man army on the White House, keep the sitting president as a figurehead, and take over, with the public none the wiser. No one believed him when he came forward, calling him a crackpot.
Later on, people finally admitted something was attempted, but that it wasn't well thought out.
The way I figure it, high powered psychopaths aren't exactly known for giving up when they have their mind set on something. If they wanted to take over; they'd have obsessed on how to take over, until they finally took over.
Anyways, Smedley Butler wrote a book on how war is a racket, which is in the public domain. I highly recommend it.
Think I have an online version.
Here it is.
He was a badass. Was all like "Yeah, I could teach Capone a thing or two about a thing or two b*tches".
"I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents."
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Considering that never happened on this forum, what feelings would you like me to have?
i asked what your thoughts are about a substantial number of republicans who are trying to take away our right to choose our leaders. are you against them or are you on the koolaid? i hope you're against their behavior
So what you are asking me is how I feel about that?
Well, for 4 years, you and your side tried to do the same thing by trying to remove Trump from office for something based on a plot/scheme ginned up by Hilary and her Koolaid drinkers.
Did you think that was just going to go away?
4 years, 4 investigations, lives destroyed, millions lost, the country will never recover from that, and you and your buddy Robtard have never come out and said "we were wrong to push that false narrative."
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I dont even know what you are referring to, whos committed sedition now? Its so confusing because apparently everyone commits sedition and treason now on the Trump side yet never gets convicted of it.
it's like...what if 50% of democrats decided that stomping on puppies was a fun game
and then you confront me about it, and instead of being like "WOW I AGREE, THOSE PEOPLE ARE F*CKED", i become all wishy-washy and try to change the subject.
would it be your fault for making an assumption?
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it's like...what if 50% of democrats decided that stomping on puppies was a fun gameand then you confront me about it, and instead of being like "WOW I AGREE, THOSE PEOPLE ARE F*CKED", i become all wishy-washy and try to change the subject.
would it be your fault for making an assumption?
What assumption did I make, I have been talking about Robtards relentless political divisive posting and how it appears to never end.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I dont even know what you are referring to, whos committed sedition now? Its so confusing because apparently everyone commits sedition and treason now on the Trump side yet never gets convicted of it.
You're lying to Bash, you do know, you're playing deflection games in the very thread on the subject right now:
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
okay broly, i wont ask you to acknowledge and condemn those who are attempting to deprive us of our voting rights (yours too). i have no idea why that's necessary, but whatevs
So if its wrong now, why wasnt it wrong after Trump won?
But to answer your question directly, no I dont agree with it, nor did I agree with what you and Robtard did for 4 years, or for that matter any your democratic party.