Originally posted by Bashar Teg
whenever you request proof, she vanishes. isn't that weird?remember all the times people demanded proof of that, and again she just vanished every f*cking time? again, isn't that weird?
It is almost like she talks a lot of shit, but cannot back it up.
So she hurls verbal grenades at people, then turns tail and runs, so she does not get hit with the shrapnel when people volley it back to her.
She can dish it out, but she cannot take it.
And she has the nerve to fancy herself like Joan of Arc. I understand the superficial similarities: Joan of Arc was a woman who passed as a man and also heard voices and had delusions of grandeur. But she was not the chicken-shit coward that Scribble is.
Originally posted by steverules_2
Pretty sure I heard somewhere on the forum that Adam doesn’t like Scribble cause she still has a penis or something along those lines, can’t remember where, when or who but it was said.
I have been the biggest advocate for transgender people on this board. Scribble does not like that I do not permit her to use her gender identity as a shield from criticism. She regularly tries to pretend that any criticism of a transgender person, i.e. her, is anti-transgender bigotry. She tries to weaponize her minority status against people she disagrees with. She is all around garbage.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
A man who had been part of a far-right group that wants to foment a civil war admitted in federal court Thursday he traveled to Minneapolis from the San Antonio area to sow chaos after the police murder of George Floyd.Ivan Harrison Hunter, 24, of Boerne, Texas pleaded guilty to a single count of rioting. The charge carries a maximum prison term of five years. Hunter admitted that he fired 13 rounds from an AK-47-style rifle into the 3rd precinct police station on May 28, 2020.
After shooting at the building, Hunter was recorded on video high-fiving another person and yelling "Justice for Floyd!" Investigators matched the skull mask Hunter was wearing in the video to a photo on his Facebook page.
Originally posted by dadudemonmmm
"Within this perspective there is no assumption of linear sexual development and no real childhood, only an externally imposed definition."Man, this is what I have been saying for years. I can certainly say that I was fully prepared (intellectually and socially) at a much younger age than 18 for sexual activity: maybe even as far back as 8. I know of at least one other person who feels the same way and she put that age around 8 or 9. Some people just grasp social situations better than others and it is definitely not linear for everyone.
That's as far as I would take that, however. I cannot speak for all children and the extreme majority would not know what sex or sex related interactions are at 8 years old. This falls under the same age limit as voting, getting a driver's license, and so forth. The vast majority of the time, the person is not intellectually or socially developed enough to warrant setting the age limit to something too young. So we set age limits on those things fully knowing that there are tons of exceptions...but "catch most of them".
What about a test? That would be difficult to establish. Someone smarter than me (in psychology) would need to tell me if a test would be an appropriate measure of determining if a child is mature enough (intellectually and socially) to do anything sexual. I proposed such things in the past to prevent ANYONE from having sexual activity (because I'm a fascist a**hole who subscribes to eugenics... apparently) unless they passed such a test and the obvious consequence of such a test would be minors passing it.
Edit - I am NOT advocating shit like NAMBLA or pedophilia. I am only saying that it is highly possible that "sexuality" is not necessarily determined by some arbitrary age (which the US thinks should be 18) but is a varied experience for everyone. Some are never mature enough. Some are mature quite a bit sooner than 18 (I am not talking "sexually", explicitly, but that could count as well).
Originally posted by Adam_PoEconject baby conject
"Objectively ridiculous" is posting three images in a row of women with axes and swords, and fantasizing that you are some feminine and fearsome warrior, when you need a mental health break over words.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
I loved Temple of Doom the most as a kid.Now I prefer Raiders.
Think I should rewatch Crystal Skull at some point. Its the only one Ive seen just one time.
Well sure, I did too as a kid, eating monkey brains, hearts being ripped out etc, all good fun. But it's not aged as well as RotLA or TLC.
I tired watching CS again a few months back, didn't last more than 30-40mins. It's just not good.
Originally posted by RobtardStop raping your kids and kill yourself, you scum. Do what we all know you'll do and murder your worthless, D-Grade family. Cleanse the gene pool and be done with it. I've seen your face, you're ugly as **** and dumb as shit. Kill yourself, Robtard.
Well sure, I did too as a kid, eating monkey brains, hearts being ripped out etc, all good fun. But it's not aged as well as RotLA or TLC.I tired watching CS again a few months back, didn't last more than 30-40mins. It's just not good.
Originally posted by BlakemoreI can't wait to read about you in the papers, Blake: "Subhuman shizo murders family, tops self, everyone cheers, including the bus". It's going to be great, I'll chuckle at it briefly before getting on with my life. Kill yourself; I mean that, honestly, end it, quickly. You're using up valuable air.
I wonder why.