Originally posted by Blakemore
Out of all the former presidents, Trump is in two ratings and is 44/44 and 42/44 😂 I guess they thought Andrew Johnson and James Buchanan were just a bit worse.
Even Gallup has Trump at a lowly 34% approval, it's no wonder why Pence and McConnell are desperately trying to peel themselves away from Trump now. The GOP schism has begun.
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/rfzgtg/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of/
This thread crylaugh
Poor DDM he gets told by 50 people he is misrepresenting data and talking bullshit.
Originally posted by Robtardhe told me to go on reddit years ago. I never have, but I was interested to see if they were gaslighting there. They were and DDM gets so much stuff removed it's not funny, well, actually... It's hilarious. laughcry he could fool his gang on here and those who liked word salads but anyone who had facts see.s to own him.
Still hoping their "piss treatment" really takes off.
Originally posted by RobtardYeah, he told me a number of times when he felt I was groomable, before he stopped talking to me I should post on Reddit it was more fun down there. So I finally had a look round and low and behold he was up to the same games there as here, except they shut him down a lot more and deleted a lot of his posts for... wait for it... basically... Gaslighting crylaugh *feeling both confirmed and amused*
Wasn't aware he had a reddit page/thing
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/rfzgtg/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of/This thread crylaugh
Poor DDM he gets told by 50 people he is misrepresenting data and talking bullshit.
"meta analysis" tickles me.
I love the story that these deworming drugs cause erectile disfunction
And then DDM replies in his typical way and bolds some of the quote. Then clarifies by saying "Emphasis mine." laughcry
Originally posted by BlakemoreI know, seriously what a dick! 😂 He is a high quality troll though.
Two of the papers included in this meta-analysis have been retracted for using fraudulent data (Elgazzar et al and Raad et al). While the analytical methods might be high-quality, if a substantial portion of underlying data in your meta-analysis is fake, then it’s garbage-in, garbage-out. The authors should retract this or at minimum re-perform the meta-analysis without that data. 😆"meta analysis" tickles me.
I love the story that these deworming drugs cause erectile disfunction
And then DDM replies in his typical way and bolds some of the quote. Then clarifies by saying "Emphasis mine." laughcry
I looked at his username and came across one of his threads.
The stuff he comes out with. 😂
Originally posted by BlakemoreI know, I looked round for about 15 minutes amazed at the volume of his disinformation, drivel and trolling. It was like finding Dexters box of slides. The excuses could only be replaced with certainty over his guilt. 😆
I looked at his username and came across one of his threads.The stuff he comes out with. 😂