Underachiever59
Senior Member
Originally posted by Galan007
Sure it's dumb, but yeah, the Ahsoka novel did reference it:
I don't think it meant literally any rocks could be bled. I think it's just a reference to the fact that kyber is technically "rock," and the dark side was able to corrupt it into changing.
As for the main topic at hand, there's many explanations.
First, we know the Sith didn't always follow this tradition. Maul had his double bladed lightsaber before fighting his first Jedi, and I believe Dooku had bled his own Jedi lightsaber before ever killing a Jedi as well, iirc. In that regard, you could argue Vader was the only true Sith of any of Palpatine's apprentices, since he was the only one to follow this tradition.
Second, as others have mentioned, it's not altogether uncommon for Jedi to die in action or go missing. A single Jedi being killed by the Sith per generation could definitely go unnoticed. This is especially true for the Banite Sith and their trademark paranoia. The sheer lengths they go to in order to cover their actions made them virtually undetectable to the Jedi.
Third, the Sith could easily pass along the kyber crystals of their slain masters to their apprentices, or collect kyber crystals from any number of the sites of historical conflict between the Jedi and the Sith. For example, we've seen in Rebels that Malachor is littered with the lightsabers of fallen Jedi and Sith (it's speculated that this is how Ezra got his green crystal, from the crossguard lightsaber he picked up in the Season 2 finale). We know Palpatine took Maul to Malachor at least once during his training. This may have also been when Maul picked out his kyber crystal off-screen.