Revealed: officer who killed Rayshard Brooks accused of covering up 2015 shooting
Revealed: officer who killed Rayshard Brooks accused of covering up 2015 shooting
Good luck gaslighting this Kmc alt rightists or "ordinary people" 😆
Revealed: officer who killed Rayshard Brooks accused of covering up 2015 shooting
Revealed: officer who killed Rayshard Brooks accused of covering up 2015 shooting
Good luck gaslighting this Kmc alt rightists or "ordinary people" 😆
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Revealed: officer who killed Rayshard Brooks accused of covering up 2015 shootingGood luck gaslighting this Kmc alt rightists or "ordinary people" 😆
Harris's letter about public safety is hilarious.
He rammed a vehicle, and could have as easily killed someone. **** him.
And yes, the police have no excuse for failing to report.
So how come a cops past can be talked about, but we can't discuss the criminal past of brooks? Isn't that how these things go, the "victims" past doesn't matter? Dipshits have gone after me for bringing up the past shit some of these people who got shot have done.
If he did bad shit he should be punished and if he wasn't it is the fault of our system that we let them get away with it.
But it has zero to do with whether or not the shooting was justified, right? Isn't that what should be said? For consistency?
Originally posted by Surtur
So how come a cops past can be talked about, but we can't discuss the criminal past of brooks? Isn't that how these things go, the "victims" past doesn't matter? Dipshits have gone after me for bringing up the past shit some of these people who got shot have done.If he did bad shit he should be punished and if he wasn't it is the fault of our system that we let them get away with it.
But it has zero to do with whether or not the shooting was justified, right? Isn't that what should be said? For consistency?
hmm
Actually, that is taken into account by prosecutors. It's the "reasonable force" consideration. If the person is a known violent quantity, in the US, police will get away with violence against the perp more often.
I don't support that position, obviously. But it is something that is considered when reviewing the case.
Originally posted by dadudemon
hmmActually, that is taken into account by prosecutors. It's the "reasonable force" consideration. If the person is a known violent quantity, in the US, police will get away with violence against the perp more often.
I don't support that position, obviously. But it is something that is considered when reviewing the case.
But I'm not talking about prosecutors. Basically talking about how the public acts, how leftists in particular act.
It's wrong to bring up past crimes committed by those shot, they say. If true, it's wrong to bring up past shit cops did.
Originally posted by Surtur
So how come a cops past can be talked about, but we can't discuss the criminal past of brooks? Isn't that how these things go, the "victims" past doesn't matter? Dipshits have gone after me for bringing up the past shit some of these people who got shot have done.If he did bad shit he should be punished and if he wasn't it is the fault of our system that we let them get away with it.
But it has zero to do with whether or not the shooting was justified, right? Isn't that what should be said? For consistency?
Surtur would be nice if just one time you stuck up for the black victim instead of the white cop who killed him.