Who will Maxwell Spill the beans on?

The funny part is if Maxwell does name democrats the usual suspects here will demand evidence to back up her claims.

And they would be right to do so.

The only reason it is funny is because they wouldn't make the same demands for evidence if she named Trump or any republican.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I can't see the image you've posted. I can tell it is an image when I quote the post but doesn't show up.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
It's the 2016 filing where allegedly everyone from the girl to journalists and lawyers were threatened.

And what evidence did they provide to back up their claims of threats?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
It's the 2016 filing where allegedly everyone from the girl to journalists and lawyers were threatened.

A court case filing does not mean what you think it does.

I can find court case filings against Obama for genocide and mass murder.

Originally posted by Surtur
The funny part is if Maxwell does name democrats the usual suspects here will demand evidence to back up her claims.

And they would be right to do so.

The only reason it is funny is because they wouldn't make the same demands for evidence if she named Trump or any republican.

Originally posted by Surtur
And what evidence did they provide to back up their claims of threats?

Originally posted by dadudemon
A court case filing does not mean what you think it does.

I can find court case filings against Obama for genocide and mass murder.

I think this os about the 2007 case you mentioned DDM

In 2007, federal prosecutors prepared a 53-page indictment that could have put Epstein in prison for life for the sex trafficking of minors. Instead, Epstein served only thirteen months for solicitation—during which he was allowed to leave and work from his office for 12 hours a day, six days a week—thanks to a sweetheart plea deal brokered by Alex Acosta, then a federal prosecutor in Florida and now Trump’s secretary of labor.

Acosta is now under fire for helping the wealthy pedophile escape federal prosecution. Amid growing calls for Acosta to resign, and at President Donald Trump’s urging, he defended his handling of the case in a press conference on Wednesday, arguing that “we live in a very different world” for sex-abuse victims than we did a decade ago and that a lenient plea deal resulting in any jail time at all was the best he could have hoped for at the time. The implication is that perpetrators are actually held to account now, regardless of their money or power; that the Me Too movement has forced the nation to reckon, finally, with how many men are allowed to get away with sexual harassment, abuse, and rape in a system indifferent to the lives of victims.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
witness accounts.

Oh? Who are the witnesses? What is their credibility? What is their relationship to the one making the accusation?

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh? Who are the witnesses? What is their credibility? What is their relationship to the one making the accusation?

Originally posted by dadudemon
A court case filing does not mean what you think it does.

I can find court case filings against Obama for genocide and mass murder.

This video of an interview with the lawyer who repped Epstein's victims might interest you.

YouTube video

They begin talking about Trump at the 5 minute mark.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Not at all if they have 20 + allegations over 40 years against them and lots of out of court settlements and gagging orders, why would we?

Keep in mind, Trump has 26 rape allegations against him. I also have levied one against him. It's not just 25.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
we'll find out it's being refiled perhaps.

I'm sure you would agree the "witness" is problematic if it turns out to be a close friend or a sibling or a parent of the accuser, right?

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm sure you would agree the "witness" is problematic if it turns out to be a close friend or a sibling or a parent of the accuser, right?

https://www.amazon.com/Credible-Evidence-Trump-Raped-13-Year-Old/dp/1797839098

Rev john Hugh McFadden

Credible Evidence Trump Raped a 13-Year-Old: To Push Trump & America Into an Empathetic Intervention

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
with Trumps record on litigation, you'd think he'd litigate and block this book.

https://www.amazon.com/Credible-Evidence-Trump-Raped-13-Year-Old/dp/1797839098

Rev john Hugh McFadden

Credible Evidence Trump Raped a 13-Year-Old: To Push Trump & America Into an Empathetic Intervention

Maybe, maybe not, but we won't be using a lack of litigation as any kind of evidence of sexual assault or rape.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
with Trumps record on litigation, you'd think he'd litigate and block this book.

https://www.amazon.com/Credible-Evidence-Trump-Raped-13-Year-Old/dp/1797839098

Rev john Hugh McFadden

Credible Evidence Trump Raped a 13-Year-Old: To Push Trump & America Into an Empathetic Intervention

So Americans shouldn't vote for Trump and Trump should be in jail, right?

Originally posted by Surtur
Maybe, maybe not, but we won't be using a lack of litigation as any kind of evidence of sexual assault or rape.

Originally posted by dadudemon
So Americans shouldn't vote for Trump and Trump should be in jail, right?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
No let's hope all those guilty, Royals and Politicians of every stripe are exposed. Partisanship and paedophilia shouldn't mix.

So how do we know anything she says isn't a lie?

If she gets to cut a deal, and we only have her word, she can implicate anyone she wants.

Originally posted by cdtm
So how do we know anything she says isn't a lie?

If she gets to cut a deal, and we only have her word, she can implicate anyone she wants.

Yeah, she's gonna need to pony up receipts for any claim being made.

EDIT: Yes that means even if she name drops Bill Clinton.