BLM terrorist kills white woman for saying "all lives matter"

Started by StyleTime4 pages

I agree news outlets are biased. I try and go for unaltered footage when video is available, for example.

Originally posted by StyleTime
Well, yeah. Not enough would disagree for there to be controversy. I'm sure there's some folks who think we should be able to kill freely, but they're a minority.

So your argument is if most people agree that something is wrong, there's no reason to report that it happened?

LoL. Yeah, it's a f***ing retarded argument but it's about what I expect from ST.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So your argument is if most people agree that something is wrong, there's no reason to report that it happened?

No, my argument is that it contributes massively to why it's not covered. Whether or not you think it should be covered is a separate issue. News outlets care about ratings/clicks.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
LoL. Yeah, it's a f***ing retarded argument but it's about what I expect from ST.

Or it's not the argument I made.

IYO

Most people agreeing that it was wrong represents what percentage of the reason it wasn't covered by most news outlets. 5% 20% 80% and does that percentage hold true for all other murders?

Re: BLM terrorist kills white woman for saying "all lives matter"

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgkdpQhkoXU&t=2s

....and of course the MSM isn't touching this story because BLM thugs murdering a person who says "all lives matter" is not a "real world problem", right pooty?

Of course if a white person had killed a black person for saying "black lives matter" or even "all lives matter" then that shit would be all over the news.

BLM thug kills a white woman though? Meh, who cares.

I saw this in the news.

She said "All lives matter." And walked away. They shot her in the head, from behind, as the couple was walking away.

Truly stupid. People are being shot over this all lives matter stuff, now.

True, but hey, at least everyone (everyone who knows about it anyway) agrees that what happened is wrong so the media has absolutely no reason to cover it according to StyleTime .

What's that, you say? Not everyone knows about it so the media should cover it? Well, yeah, common sense would suggest that but apparently a certain someone is sorely lacking in that area lol.

Going by that same logic, guess that also means the media shouldn't have covered the horrible murder of the young girl who got ran over in Chatlottesville since everyone agreed it was tragic.

It really is amazing, the lengths some people will go in order to avoid admitting that the reason it's not getting much coverage is because it doesn't fit the MSM's narrative.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You know The Sun is...right wing...right?

Does it matter?

Originally posted by Silent Master
IYO

Most people agreeing that it was wrong represents what percentage of the reason it wasn't covered by most news outlets. 5% 20% 80% and does that percentage hold true for all other murders?


It's difficult to quantify things like that, and there are no hard and fast rules. Comparing other murder cases would mean examining different factors unique to that case.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
True, but hey, at least everyone (everyone who knows about it anyway) agrees that what happened is wrong so the media has absolutely no reason to cover it according to StyleTime .

What's that, you say? Not everyone knows about it so the media should cover it? Well, yeah, common sense would suggest that but apparently a certain someone is sorely lacking in that area lol.

Going by that same logic, guess that also means the media shouldn't have covered the horrible murder of the young girl who got ran over in Chatlottesville since everyone agreed it was tragic.


Again, I'm not commenting on what "should" be covered, which you already know. We also don't cover many foreign policy **** ups we've had, but I wish we would. Ratings matter to media companies, so you have to do your own work if want info. /shrug
Originally posted by Silent Master
It really is amazing, the lengths some people will go in order to avoid admitting that the reason it's not getting much coverage is because it doesn't fit the MSM's narrative.

Right, as I said, your concern isn't even over the incident, but this other issue. This is due to there being little to discuss on the main topic. I'm surprised y'all haven't just made a "MSM media bias" thread. Seems like it'd be popular.

Me, DDM, and Artol are the only ones who actually tried talking about the event, other than the OP. I only see this thread going in another circle unless some new details break.

Thank you for proving my point

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Does it matter?

Yes. As SM suggests, media outlets pick and choose what they report by whether or not it fits their narrative. It fits the sun's narrative.

That's no excuse to ignore this story or not point out all of the details.

Journalists are supposed to report on things like this regardless of whether or not they think it "fits their narrative".

Both right-wing and left-wing news sites covered the George Floyd murder. So I guess that it "fit the narrative" of places like FOX news and OAN news, yeah?

Is that going to be the new argument to be used by leftists whenever CNN or MSNBC doesn't cover a relevant story? "Well, that story doesn't fit their narrative so it's perfectly acceptable for them not to cover it."

I think situations like these is why you're going to have an escalated civil war/race war that the media keeps feeding.

It's going to get worse. You're not going to see the white supremacists (from multiple groups) just sit back and keep taking this. Makes me nervous. An escalating civil war and race war (not mutually exclusive) is not a win for anyone.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I think situations like these is why you're going to have an escalated civil war/race war that the media keeps feeding.

It's going to get worse. You're not going to see the white supremacists (from multiple groups) just sit back and keep taking this. Makes me nervous. An escalating civil war and race war (not mutually exclusive) is not a win for anyone.

Ha, wrong on that one, the media wins YUGELY, just like as much as they hate trump, his headlines drives their circulation and clicks. Trump might have single handedly saved multiple media/news groups.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Ha, wrong on that one, the media wins YUGELY, just like as much as they hate trump, his headlines drives their circulation and clicks. Trump might have single handedly saved multiple media/news groups.

You're not wrong.

CNN big-wig producer said as much about Trump back in 2017/2018. Can't remember when. They need Trump to stay afloat.

Perhaps that is why Trump will win in the fall - I don't know what the media is going to do to ensure Trump will win.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't know what the media is going to do to ensure Trump will win.

They'll do what they did in 2016, tell everyone Trump will DEFINITELY lose, worked like a charm IMO.

The woman clearly didn't deserve to die, no matter how stupid her ideas were. The entire "All lives matter movement" is a racist equalisation strategy aimed at the already bigoted and stupid. However, being bigoted and stupid doesn't mean you deserve to be shot. The US gun culture and the culture war exacerbated by the right trying to prevent those without a voice having one is going to lead to more and more of this.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
The woman clearly didn't deserve to die, no matter how stupid her ideas were. The entire "All lives matter movement" is a racist equalisation strategy aimed at the already bigoted and stupid. However, being bigoted and stupid doesn't mean you deserve to be shot. The US gun culture and the culture war exacerbated by the right trying to prevent those without a voice having one is going to lead to more and more of this.

Pretty much.

The title of this thread is also dishonest, the argument started because someone in the group Jessica Doty Whitaker (the victim) was with used a racial slur, it was overheard by another group and that started the confrontation which unfortunately lead to the shooting. Guns were present with both groups.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/indiana-woman-shot-killed-argument-black-lives-matter-supporters

The guy that shot her is the racist and I seriously doubt he was right-wing. probably didn't have a legal gun either.