Originally posted by Robtard
Nah, nah , nah. You're not flipping that easy. You were a staunch Trumper from 2016-2018/19 like the rest here, this wasn't some Machiavellian move planned pre-election from you people.Request: DENIED
If Trump loses the election I want twitter to ban him, just for the lulz of a full melt down of his platform 😉
Originally posted by Robtard
I would greatly enjoy seeing that. But I also would enjoy Trump's meltdown postings after losing. So I am torn. But kinda leaning towards you.
Force him onto youtube where he would make 2-3 videos and get banned as well, his ego would force him to eat 10 lbs of kfc soulcrushing grease.
Originally posted by Surtur
Mitch has pushed through a record amount.I think he's legit said this is his goal. I doubt he gives a f*ck about Trump at all.
Trump just provided a great distraction for him to achieve his goals.
Yeah, I think you are right, if the Democrats were to win hey should extend he Supreme Court. And give Puerto Rico and D.C. statehood, And ruthlessly push through their agenda, but they have little political fight in them beyond empty posturing.
Originally posted by Artol
Yeah, I think you are right, if the Democrats were to win hey should extend he Supreme Court. And give Puerto Rico and D.C. statehood, And ruthlessly push through their agenda, but they have little political fight in them beyond empty posturing.
Oh yes they should do all that...assuming they could guarantee no republican ever becomes president again. Because they would not like what would happen next once a republican got into the white house again after all that.
And who knows if they will do it, they got rid of the filibuster and set *that* precedent and it all turned out fine right?
Originally posted by Surtur
Oh yes they should do all that...assuming they could guarantee no republican ever becomes president again. Because they would not like what would happen next once a republican got into the white house again after all that.And who knows if they will do it, they got rid of the filibuster and set *that* precedent and it all turned out fine right?
For sure, Republicans would do it as well, but it’s somewhat irrelevant since they are already having a good run with justices. The US political system is deeply broken and there’s no working across the aisle (besides the shared corruption, militarism and neoliberal ideology of course), so the name of the game, if you truly believe in your point of view is ruthlessly using all tools at your disposal to achieve them.
One might hope that that could lead to a bipartisan agreement to renegotiate the nature of the system from the ground up, rather than partake in a political arms race.