Originally posted by BrolyBlackwow the goal post on the Biden one keeps moving pretty far from where it started.
^all of this is bullshit from a bullshitterBiden has never done one since being the nominee
Flyod dying wasn’t a hoax, the media one sided narrative was a hoax.
"Joe Biden has never given an interview to Chris Wallace"-Broly
Wait was it the media who held back the video or law enforcement?
"A district judge allowed news outlets to view the two videos, which show the clearest picture yet of Mr Floyd's last moments in the Minnesota city on 25 May."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bb...canada-53425792
"The videos, made available to the public by a Hennepin County judge, were filed as evidence in the former officers’ criminal case and presented for viewing in court just hours before Floyd’s family filed a wrongful-death civil suit against the city of Minneapolis and the four police officers charged in his death."
Originally posted by Raptor22
i have 2 agree with u there man.In a debate over your honesty and integrity, its basically "over nothing at all".
Well said
Perhaps you didn’t read what I wrote. I think you have problems understanding english because you are so full of yourself.
“
all of this is bullshit from a bullshitter
Biden has never done one since being the nominee
Flyod dying was not hoax, the media one sided narrative was a hoax.”
Please spend the rest of your day here wasting more time about you being proven wrong, god know you need the online eboost so you can feel better about your fake win.
Originally posted by Raptor22
have 2 disagree with u there.Brolys "truth" -"Jerry Nadler says Portland Riots are a myth"-Broly
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f11/t670273.html
Actual truth- "Rep. Jerry Nadler calls violence from Antifa in Portland a ‘myth’"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsbreak.com/amp/n/0PiIJVy0
Brolys "truth"- "Joe Biden has never given an interview to Chris Wallace"-Broly
"He’s never done one as a presidential candidate."-Broly
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=670135&pagenumber=1
Actual truth- https://youtu.be/sgaPBZ7s5LM
Brolys "truth"- "Flyod Hoax- I just learned that the whole thing was a complete hoax"-Broly
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=669983&pagenumber=1
Actual truth- Clearly the whole thing was not a complete hoax.
Thats just with in the last 2 weeks
To the first point:
Yup, violence from AntiFa is there. We fundementally disagree with what you're trying to say and I agree with what Supra was posting about. Nothing dishonest. It's meaningless semantics since Antifa is a large component of these violent protests. It's a note a myth. It's fact. Nadler was wrong and he's a giant piece of shit.
To your second point, in the same thread, Supra very much clarifies his position on the Biden interview stuff and he has this to say:
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
He can’t do an interview and take questions without falling apart which is why he wouldn’t dare give an interview with Wallace
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=17236576#post17236576
So while there are two interpretations to what Supra said, since he clarified what he actually meant later in the same thread, we should go with what Supra actually meant.
To your last point, he's literally correct. It was covered when the transcripts were released as part of the court case. We know Floyd refused to comply since that information was released. Any news outlet that said Floyd did nothing at all and it was unprovoked was part of the George Floyd hoax Supra refers to - it was a very dishonest narrative that caused the deaths of up to 50 people. That's blood on the MSM's hands.
So, from my perspective, you're 0/3 and Supra is 3/3 on the points you brought up. If I concede that the second point had a very terribly worded OP, then you're .5/3 and Supra is 2.5/3.
Originally posted by dadudemonwhether or not nadler said antifa was part of has no bearing on Broly misinterpreting what was said. Nadler didnt say the riots were a myth like Broly claimed, he said antifas hand in them was a myth which is completly different. 1/1.
To the first point:Yup, violence from AntiFa is there. We fundementally disagree with what you're trying to say and I agree with what Supra was posting about. Nothing dishonest. It's meaningless semantics since Antifa is a large component of these violent protests. It's a note a myth. It's fact. Nadler was wrong and he's a giant piece of shit.
To your second point, in the same thread, Supra very much clarifies his position on the Biden interview stuff and he has this to say:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=17236576#post17236576
So while there are two interpretations to what Supra said, since he clarified what he actually meant later in the same thread, we should go with what Supra actually meant.
To your last point, he's literally correct. It was covered when the transcripts were released as part of the court case. We know Floyd refused to comply since that information was released. Any news outlet that said Floyd did nothing at all and it was unprovoked was part of the George Floyd hoax Supra refers to - it was a very dishonest narrative that caused the deaths of up to 50 people. That's blood on the MSM's hands.
So, from my perspective, you're 0/3 and Supra is 3/3 on the points you brought up. If I concede that the second point had a very terribly worded OP, then you're .5/3 and Supra is 2.5/3.
"Joe Biden has never given an interview to Chris Wallace"-Broly
There is no other interpretation of never here.
There is a huge difference between clarifying and completly reversing positions from never to in the past few months.
nev·er
adverb
1. at no time in the past or future; on no occasion; not ever.
2/2
"Any news outlet that said Floyd did nothing at all and it was unprovoked was part of the George Floyd hoax Supra refers to"-ddm
The msms coverage of the story is just one aspect and does not encompass the "whole thing" nor does it make it a "complete" hoax like he stated.
"I just learned that the whole thing was a complete hoax"-broly
That would be 3/3, raptor completes the hat trick and the crowd goes wild.
You're using words like interpretation and semantics. Unfortunately hes using absolutes like "never", "complete", "whole thing" etc... Which dont leave much if any wiggle room for interpretation.
Originally posted by Raptor22
whether or not nadler said antifa was part of has no bearing on Broly misinterpreting what was said. Nadler didnt say the riots were a myth like Broly claimed, he said antifas hand in them was a myth which is completly different. 1/1."Joe Biden has never given an interview to Chris Wallace"-Broly
There is no other interpretation of never here.
There is a huge difference between clarifying and completly reversing positions from never to in the past few months.
nev·er
adverb
1. at no time in the past or future; on no occasion; not ever.2/2
"Any news outlet that said Floyd did nothing at all and it was unprovoked was part of the George Floyd hoax Supra refers to"-ddm
The msms coverage of the story is just one aspect and does not encompass the "whole thing" nor does it make it a "complete" hoax like he stated.
"I just learned that the whole thing was a complete hoax"-broly
That would be 3/3, raptor completes the hat trick and the crowd goes wild.
You're using words like interpretation and semantics. Unfortunately hes using absolutes like "never", "complete", "whole thing" etc... Which dont leave much if any wiggle room for interpretation.
To the first part, your interpretation comes off as a red herring - it even comes dangerously close to dishonest of you. He even directly linked to the tweet and video eliminating possible accusations such as the one you're trying to levy against him. The only thing he has to do is add one more noun to his existing OP and it is perfectly accurate: antifa riots vs. riots. That distinction is unnecessary to anyone part of the conversation who understands Antifa's history and role in Portland's riots. Notice you didn't criticize his absence of "violence" only the fact he left antifa out - a more important distinction to his point since his entire point is about Nadler denying the violence element of the Portland riots.
If you listen to what Nadler says, he says that's a myth being spread in Washington. About the Antifa-related violence in Portland. Supra called it "riots" in Portland. Fits since the definition of riots is a violent disturbance of the peace.
To your second point, what I said is my rebuttal to everything you just said meaning there is no meaningful conversation left to be had and this is the point where a conversation turns south if you want to keep pressing it:
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
He can’t do an interview and take questions without falling apart which is why he wouldn’t dare give an interview with Wallace
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/...76#post17236576So while there are two interpretations to what Supra said, since he clarified what he actually meant later in the same thread, we should go with what Supra actually meant.
It doesn't matter if you want to nail him for the first statement since he later clarified. Keep in mind he clarified before you tried to nail him for that OP wording meaning there's no back-peddle or goalpost moving accusation you can bring up against him. What's great about honest conversation is you can clarify what you specifically meant if you misspoke prior. Just like I gave you the benefit of the doubt on Nadler's statement and what accusation you're levying against Supra, I also give him the benefit of the doubt that he hastily posted his point and later clarified. 🙂
We can agree to disagree if you'd like. But I did concede half of one of the points already. I also think we are coming close to this getting off the rails of a respectful convo and delving into the disrespectful - I'd like to avoid that. I don't want to make more KMC GDF drama happen. You can have last word and final rebuttal and I'll leave the convo as it. Me conceding the floor permanently to you on this topic to avoid ruining our relationship.
Originally posted by dadudemonno biggie man. Ill say my piece. If u want to respond go for it. If not, its all good, im not gonna troll u or talk shit or anything.
To the first part, your interpretation comes off as a red herring - it even comes dangerously close to dishonest of you. He even directly linked to the tweet and video eliminating possible accusations such as the one you're trying to levy against him. The only thing he has to do is add one more noun to his existing OP and it is perfectly accurate: antifa riots vs. riots. That distinction is unnecessary to anyone part of the conversation who understands Antifa's history and role in Portland's riots. Notice you didn't criticize his absence of "violence" only the fact he left antifa out - a more important distinction to his point since his entire point is about Nadler denying the violence element of the Portland riots.If you listen to what Nadler says, he says that's a myth being spread in Washington. About the Antifa-related violence in Portland. Supra called it "riots" in Portland. Fits since the definition of riots is a violent disturbance of the peace.
To your second point, what I said is my rebuttal to everything you just said meaning there is no meaningful conversation left to be had and this is the point where a conversation turns south if you want to keep pressing it:
It doesn't matter if you want to nail him for the first statement since he later clarified. Keep in mind he clarified before you tried to nail him for that OP wording meaning there's no back-peddle or goalpost moving accusation you can bring up against him. What's great about honest conversation is you can clarify what you specifically meant if you misspoke prior. Just like I gave you the benefit of the doubt on Nadler's statement and what accusation you're levying against Supra, I also give him the benefit of the doubt that he hastily posted his point and later clarified. 🙂
We can agree to disagree if you'd like. But I did concede half of one of the points already. I also think we are coming close to this getting off the rails of a respectful convo and delving into the disrespectful - I'd like to avoid that. I don't want to make more KMC GDF drama happen. You can have last word and final rebuttal and I'll leave the convo as it. Me conceding the floor permanently to you on this topic to avoid ruining our relationship.
If u honestly dont feel that thread titles like
"Jerry Nadler says Portland Riots are a myth"
And
"Joe Biden has never given an interview to Chris Wallace"
Are near textbook examples of deceptive headlines, and are nearly identical to the misleading shenanigans the msm is so often accused of i guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
Originally posted by Raptor22
have 2 disagree with u there.Brolys "truth" -"Jerry Nadler says Portland Riots are a myth"-Broly
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f11/t670273.html
Actual truth- "Rep. Jerry Nadler calls violence from Antifa in Portland a ‘myth’"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsbreak.com/amp/n/0PiIJVy0
Brolys "truth"- "Joe Biden has never given an interview to Chris Wallace"-Broly
"He’s never done one as a presidential candidate."-Broly
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=670135&pagenumber=1
Actual truth- https://youtu.be/sgaPBZ7s5LM
Brolys "truth"- "Flyod Hoax- I just learned that the whole thing was a complete hoax"-Broly
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=669983&pagenumber=1
Actual truth- Clearly the whole thing was not a complete hoax.
Thats just with in the last 2 weeks
😂 😂 😂