Trump is the Anti Christ Apparently

STOP
Stop
Stop
Stop
STOP
STOP
STopo000000pppppp0000oooooopppppp

Nobody needs to ban or self-exile. From what it seems, Surt feels as though KMC is going through some liberal nepotism. On one hand, having liberal views myself, I can agree with a lot of his opponents views over his own, BUT it is true that due to how disgusting Trumpster is, those on the conservative side are treated way more harshly in terms of hearing their arguments, to the point of near revenge persecution of support of white hetero males, which causes them to lean back on Trump for support, thus giving Trump the exact support liberals are trying to dissuade.

Quite simply, liberals, conservatives are wrong for backing Trump and holding obsolete views, but liberals must know that NOT ALL conservative views are obsolete, and some are in fact needed to prevent liberals from turning into anarchists.

That's why I like KMC. It's an obscure forum on the internet, but it's also a microcosm of the world. Plus I get to debate movies with homies I've known for years. Never change up 🙂

You'd think a 2 week ban was funny too right rob?

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol yeah I think I do. I want you gone for 2 weeks.

You won't be though, Backfire will never be consistent.

So you want me to start banning people for lying again?

Originally posted by BackFire
So you want me to start banning people for lying again?

Nah, I want you to make up for your past behavior with a 2 week ban for the bootlicking boys, then I want you to continue on your current "i saw nothing" path.

You game? You can make up for your past incredible bias.

My prediction: you won't.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nah, I want you to make up for your past behavior with a 2 week ban for the bootlicking boys, then I want you to continue on your current "i saw nothing" path.

You game? You can make up for your past incredible bias.

My prediction: you won't.

What bias is that?

How about banning one of them for 2 weeks and then once that ban ends, ban the other?

Just trying to help. 😇

Originally posted by BackFire
What bias is that?

The bias of you banning me for a "lie" and not them, and suddenly deciding it's wrong only after you've banned me for it but not them.

Originally posted by Silent Master
How about banning one of them for 2 weeks and then once that ban ends, ban the other?

Just trying to help. 😇

If you Trumpers get everyone who upsets you banned, it's just going to be a handful of your echochambering it up. Does that that sound like fun?

edit: Yeah, probably does to you. Nevermind

Maybe I was wrong. Maybe I should start banning people for lying again. Rob and Whirley lied, right? Guess it wouldn’t be the end of the world to ban them for it too.

Surt lied in this very thread a page back...

Originally posted by Surtur
The bias of you banning me for a "lie" and not them, and suddenly deciding it's wrong only after you've banned me for it but not them.

Right. So you do want me to ban people for lying again then?

Originally posted by BackFire
Maybe I was wrong. Maybe I should start banning people for lying again. Rob and Whirley lied, right? Guess it wouldn’t be the end of the world to ban them for it too.

No don't ban people for lying, beyond the 2 week ban you give to the lying bootlicking boys to make up for past injustice.

Cuz see, a weasel might try to say "more than rob and whirly have lied" and miss the point. So don't go that route 🙂

Originally posted by BackFire
Right. So you do want me to ban people for lying again then?

I want you to ban Rob and Whirly for their past lies, and declare that from now on you've learned a lesson about banning folk for lies.

See, cuz you wouldn't be a little weasel right now and say "u lied and said u wouldn't bring this up, so banned" but just in case u would? No 🙂

This shit is BANanas

Originally posted by Surtur
No don't ban people for lying, beyond the 2 week ban you give to the lying bootlicking boys to make up for past injustice.

Cuz see, a weasel might try to say "more than rob and whirly have lied" and miss the point. So don't go that route 🙂

It seems you just want people you don’t like banned and you’re making a feeble attempt to manipulate me into doing it.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you Trumpers get everyone who upsets you banned, it's just going to be a handful of your echochambering it up. Does that that sound like fun?

edit: Yeah, probably does to you. Nevermind

If you're responding to a Trumper, why did you quote me?

Originally posted by BackFire
It seems you just want people you don’t like banned and you’re making a feeble attempt to manipulate me into doing it.

Bingo

Originally posted by BackFire
It seems you just want people you don’t like banned and you’re making a feeble attempt to manipulate me into doing it.

So no, you won't ban them for their many lies, correct? Ha ha but you gave one of them a 1 day ban, good one tho.

Originally posted by Surtur
I want you to ban Rob and Whirly for their past lies, and declare that from now on you've learned a lesson about banning folk for lies.

See, cuz you wouldn't be a little weasel right now and say "u lied and said u wouldn't bring this up, so banned" but just in case u would? No 🙂

What makes you think you have any say in any of this? You think you saying “no” is enough for me to not ban you if I want to?

*popcorn resumes*

Just don't get too bloody, boys