RussiaTards

Millions of Democrats believed in some bogus Russian conspiracy theory that Carter Page was a Russian asset that infiltrated the Trump campaign, to broker a deal with Putin and Trump to help win him the election

The FISA warrants were supposed to be infallible, yet they proved to be falsified.

The FISA court rebuked the FBI

The Durham probe revealed the Carter Page FISA warrant was illegal in nature.

Robert Mueller, the FBI, CIA and the House and Senate Intel Committees never produced any evidence

All the Obama officials under oath behind closed doors said they never say any evidence of collusion or coordination

Are these Russia Tards going to just be allowed to lie for four years about this or are they going to need to own up

Yeah, it's super duper sad people bought into this.

So sad they should probably avoid trying to call out other groups for conspiracies.

They'll never own it. Admitting they were wrong would basically be admitting that Trump beat Hillary fair and square and that is unthinkable to them.

Broccoli thread.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
They'll never own it. Admitting they were wrong would basically be admitting that Trump beat Hillary fair and square and that is unthinkable to them.

Rob owns it wether he wants to or not

Trump said there's more to come besides the guilty plea from e-mail-manipulator treason dude.

And since we know that Russia spent less than $500,000 on the 2016 presidential election and almost every major European country spent millions, you have to wonder how honest the "Russian interference" narrative to begin with.

Hint: It wasn't honest at all and anyone in the Cybersecurity community, working for the government, knows exactly how much countries like the UK, Germany, France and Israel spend on lobbying and US Politicians.

It's all a massive farce. The entire "Russian Interference" narrative.

I think it was Backfire that said, "But those are our allies. Russia is not." True. True. It's probably better for Germany to support a politician in the US than it is for Russia to do the same.

They'll lie until the end of time.

Why start being honest now?

Originally posted by wxyz
They'll lie until the end of time.

Why start being honest now?

You’re just a Sock.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Trump said there's more to come besides the guilty plea from e-mail-manipulator treason dude.

And since we know that Russia spent less than $500,000 on the 2016 presidential election and almost every major European country spent millions, you have to wonder how honest the "Russian interference" narrative to begin with.

Hint: It wasn't honest at all and anyone in the Cybersecurity community, working for the government, knows exactly how much countries like the UK, Germany, France and Israel spend on lobbying and US Politicians.

It's all a massive farce. The entire "Russian Interference" narrative.

I think it was Backfire that said, "But those are our allies. Russia is not." True. True. It's probably better for Germany to support a politician in the US than it is for Russia to do the same.

Did you know it was the democracy’s and the Obama admin that collided with Russia and Ukraine?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Did you know it was the democracy’s and the Obama admin that collided with Russia and Ukraine?

Yes, I knew that.

But if you read Pro-Democratic Party propaganda machines like The Guardian, CNN, Politico, etc., you'd think it was Trump and the GOP.

Why is it so hard to the Russia tards to understand that

HYG: G.O.P.-Led Senate Panel Details Ties Between 2016 Trump Campaign and Russia

It provided a bipartisan Senate imprimatur for an extraordinary set of facts: The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary. -snip

Originally posted by Eon Blue
You’re just a Sock.

No he's cool.

Originally posted by Robtard
HYG: G.O.P.-Led Senate Panel Details Ties Between 2016 Trump Campaign and Russia

It provided a bipartisan Senate imprimatur for an extraordinary set of facts: The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary. -snip

Yes, I have seen the cherry picking of the report that in the end concludes there was no collusion etc.

Your narrative was wrong. Take the L 🙂

He hasnt actually read the report.
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

Originally posted by Robtard
HYG: G.O.P.-Led Senate Panel Details Ties Between 2016 Trump Campaign and Russia

It provided a bipartisan Senate imprimatur for an extraordinary set of facts: The Russian government disrupted an American election to help Mr. Trump become president, Russian intelligence services viewed members of the Trump campaign as easily manipulated, and some of Mr. Trump’s advisers were eager for the help from an American adversary. -snip

Originally posted by Robtard

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/08/18/new-bipartisan-report-raises-question-if-this-isnt-collusion-what-is/

But, if it isn't collusion, what is it?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
He hasnt actually read the report.
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

Yeah, ignore their bad faith attempts. They know they lost.