Can World Breaker Hulk break the chains in Up and the Sky?

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
It's the height of fanboyism to see a substance for the first time ever in comics, have it called unbreakable by the villain (cuz they NEVER make hyperbolic boasts&#128527😉 only to see Clark break it a panel later. It's really no more impressive than any of his other strength feats. Less so. There is no way to quantify the true strength of said metal except the words of a villain proven to make hyperbolic boasts in a six books series full of hyperbolic boasts designed to make Clark quit.

villains are egomaniacal people who consistently overestimate their abilities and underestimate heros. How many times has Riddler stated Batman will NEVER solve a riddle? How many times has Batman in fact, done it? Every. Single. Time. Lying hyperbole is LITERALLY part of the villain trope

Superman is hands down one of the most powerful heros to ever exist. Near inarguable. But idiotic feat wanking devalues his real feats.

The chains were made to haul stars. That’s not boasting, it’s telling you what they are used for.

You keep going in circles, smh next you’ll go back to your inability to know how tensions work.

Originally posted by Magnon
No he can't, WBH would fail hard.

Hulk's anger-constrained dynamic strength cannot get the job done; breaking the chains requires the far stronger dynamic strength of Superman who can simply assume arbitrarily high power-levels as needed to save the day.

But his anger in unlimited.

https://ibb.co/DksRq9V
https://ibb.co/MDYG5Nz

WB Hulk can do it easily.

Breaking chains. 😂

A FAR weaker hulk broke adhesive X. Look it up and see how strong it is. Caps Shield could not even chip it.

Originally posted by JBL
Check you PM Saint.

I did,thanks.

And well...I mean I'd only agree with the mods on some things. But I can't force their hands....if I want to post on this forum,I have to accept certain rules.

@diesl

um Can you quantify this feat by anything other than this characters words? No? So, fact. Can the validity of his boasts be proven wrong or illogical based on the inconsistencies and fallacies of his words and acts shown on page? Yes. That's it. It's called logic and reading what's actually on page instead of taking hyperbolic villain boasts as fact when we all know they're usually overestimating themselves 🤷🏿‍♂️

Murderers and rapists are notorious for saying shit to demoralize their victims. Doesn't make it true

What's stated on panel is CLEARLY wrong. This villain states the robots are stronger and faster than Clark, yet we see that heros far less powerful than Clark has been defeating them. This is a simple fact, provable on page. His statements are CLEARLY, and PROVABLY hyperbolic and not at all fact based 🤷🏿‍♂️

Here is a statement by the same villain.

And here is proof his statements are clearly hyperbole at best, lies at worst.
here we have clear proof that not only have lesser heros been beating these robots, but they've been doing so for some time and are just starting to have problems with them.

Would said heros fare this well vs an army of Clarks? They wouldn't do that well vs ONE of Clark 😂 Incontrovertible proof that the villains words are hyperbolic bullshit, and therefore not an accurate measure by which to quantify this metal. Dude is a ****ing liar or delusional, obviously 😂

What isn't hyperbole is the role the chains are used for, that's what people are arguing.

They're not arguing the unbreakable part, they're saying it's usedt o haul stars between galaxies,hence they're super strong. Simple.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
@diesl

um Can you quantify this feat by anything other than this characters words? No? So, fact. Can the validity of his boasts be proven wrong or illogical based on the inconsistencies and fallacies of his words and acts shown on page? Yes. That's it. It's called logic and reading what's actually on page instead of taking hyperbolic villain boasts as fact when we all know they're usually overestimating themselves 🤷🏿‍♂️

Murderers and rapists are notorious for saying shit to demoralize their victims. Doesn't make it true

What's stated on panel is CLEARLY wrong. This villain states the robots are stronger and faster than Clark, yet we see that heros far less powerful than Clark has been defeating them. This is a simple fact, provable on page. His statements are CLEARLY, and PROVABLY hyperbolic and not at all fact based 🤷🏿‍♂️

Here is a statement by the same villain.

And here is proof his statements are clearly hyperbole at best, lies at worst.
here we have clear proof that not only have lesser heros been beating these robots, but they've been doing so for some time and are just starting to have problems with them.

Would said heros fare this well vs an army of Clarks? They wouldn't do that well vs ONE of Clark 😂 Incontrovertible proof that the villains words are hyperbolic bullshit, and therefore not an accurate measure by which to quantify this metal. Dude is a ****ing liar or delusional, obviously 😂

You need to prove that the chains were not hauling the stars across the galaxy. Nothing else matters otherwise.

Good luck.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Breaking chains. 😂

In a weakened state both cases and one involves magic.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Correlation is not causation. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. Yadda, Yadda, Yadda.

You need to prove that the chains were not hauling the stars across the galaxy. Nothing else matters otherwise.

Good luck.

Originally posted by lawest9
My point exactly.

His point is garbage though. Superman vs the true unbreakable...

https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/58371618/SmartSelect_20200824-003059_Chrome.jpg.html
https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/58371619/SmartSelect_20200824-003113_Chrome.jpg.html
https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/58371620/SmartSelect_20200824-003148_Chrome.jpg.html
https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/58371621/SmartSelect_20200824-003159_Chrome.jpg.html

Originally posted by TheHulkster
In a weakened state both cases and one involves magic.

Lol... diesldude is so terrible. Its sad looking at his posts.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
In a weakened state both cases and one involves magic.

@Carver: that's not addressing the point though.

How much energy does it take to break Strange's concentration? If Captain Marvel took a giant strapon out and cockslapped him in the face, breaking his concentration, does that mean she's super strong?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Correlation is not causation. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. Yadda, Yadda, Yadda.

You need to prove that the chains were not hauling the stars across the galaxy. Nothing else matters otherwise.

Good luck.

Let's track this. A claim was made. Proof for said claim was character statement. I then proved said characters statements can be proven to be wrong and or lies. I proved this Incontrovertibly. Logical conclusion: this characters statements cannot be used as fact proofs. If you still hold this characters words as proof or agree with someone who does, you are ignoring logic and ACTUAL proof. Therefore your conclusions are based in your desired outcome, i.e. emotional.

statements only hold value if multiple characters have said the same statement or if a feat of said statement can be found else where, period.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Let's track this. A claim was made. Proof for said claim was character statement. I then proved said characters statements can be proven to be wrong and or lies. I proved this Incontrovertibly. Logical conclusion: this characters statements cannot be used as fact proofs. If you still hold this characters words as proof or agree with someone who does, you are ignoring logic and ACTUAL proof. Therefore your conclusions are based in your desired outcome, i.e. emotional.

He lied throughout the book.

Originally posted by carver9
Lol... diesldude is so terrible. Its sad looking at his posts.

Originally posted by JBL
You think dude knew this? He's clueless.