Jacob Blake Police Shooting

Originally posted by Illinois LARPer
Carl took it to those blacks, he should be Prez. He slaps a ***** girl up in this video. **** dem Feminazi chick's.

https://thesource.com/2020/08/30/watch-17-year-old-suspect-kyle-rittenhouse-caught-assaulting-girl-before-getting-a-beatdown/

Yeah, he has quite the history of beating up girls. All of the racists here defending him should be proud. His classmates said they thought he was going to be end up a school shooter, and were totally unsurprised that he did this. He is a pathetic MAGA incel just like the jokes here worshipping him like he is the next supreme gentlemen for their little cult.

Lol if you're this angry now I can't wait to see how you'll react if he is found not guilty.

Apparantly he was hitting the woman attacking his little sister.

So I think he's morally justified imo, espcailly seen as he was just a kid at the time.

The leftist faggots are trying (and failing) so desperately to smear this little kid, despite the fact that they're trying lionise the most violent racial group (black people) by stats above all else.

Kyle Rittenhouse was a hero, tbh. Clear cut case of self defense in Kenosha.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol if you're this angry now I can't wait to see how you'll react if he is found not guilty.

Which he most certainly should be found. He didn't murder anyone. Killing in self defense is not murder but way too many democrat dipshits don't get that. In their minds it's "dur hur he's a Trump supporter so he's guilty her derp!"

Otoh, BLM has actually murdered people in cold blood but they pretend like it didn't happen lmao.

Well, what's new? Leftists have a history of trying to make minors be treated like adults because "muh pedo-acceptance!" Hollyweird, etc.

It's kind of funny because one of the dudes killed by Kyle was a legit pedo that went to prison for 12 years for it. And now they are holding up Kyle's homicide victims as martyrs for their pedo-acceptance cause. "Muh pedos! Muh BLM! Muh Antifa!"

WEEEEE!

Yes, leftists in general are sick, disgusting people.

Everyone knows that.

Not everyone.

Well, everyone who is not a retard lefty.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Well, what's new? Leftists have a history of trying to make minors be treated like adults because "muh pedo-acceptance!" Hollyweird, etc.

It's kind of funny because one of the dudes killed by Kyle was a legit pedo that went to prison for 12 years for it. And now they are holding up Kyle's homicide victims as martyrs for their pedo-acceptance cause. "Muh pedos! Muh BLM! Muh Antifa!"

WEEEEE!

Put it like this, I DON'T have any sympathy for the people Kyle killed, as they were rioting, and as you are saying, they were rather legit bad people. HOWEVER, I don't feel bad for Kyle, nor will I defend him, because as stated, he had NO REASON to be there other than his personal adrenaline rush, considering the armored police presence, and he either did or REALLY REALLY SHOULD HAVE known the shitstorm he has getting into before he entered the state, and even if he was too young to consider his actions, he should have had an adult monitoring him, especially with an assault rifle involved.

As I have stated before, HE HAS MASSIVELY SABOTAGED TRUMP, and while he does have some supporters backing him for admittedly killing some bad folks who were admittedly trying to attack him , he also has MANY PEOPLE, most notably state officials, looking at him as a terrorist due to the context of him being there to begin with, and Trump seeming like his Fascist Demagogue, and it's a situation that DOESN'T NEED TO BE. Quite simply, if he didn't show up to that rally, either BLM would have killed someone there and had their credibility completely squashed, or it would have happened when Rand Paul got attacked. But now, simply because of Kyle's clear motive of an adrenaline rush, liberals now feel justified in their reckless rage, and he is essentially THE PERFECT STRAWMAN for liberals to secure the November victory.

This is why I keep harping. Even if he isn't a sadist, you have to at least acknowledge that he is a MASSIVE DUMBASS who COMPLETELY SABOTAGED AND POSSIBLY SINGLE-HABDEDLY KILLED HIS OWN CAUSE. It is ABSOLUTELY humiliating, and I don't see how it can be denied.

Quite simply, he should have stuck to being a keyboard warrior, but instead he wanted to be a wannabe warrior, and now not only is he being charged with war crimes, but his attack is also being taken as a declaration of war to all he supports. It is the EPITOME of waking a sleeping giant.

You are not being asked to defend him going there. Merely to acknowledge what he did was in self defense.

'I am 100% Antifa': Alleged Portland shooter was previously arrested—and released—for bringing illegal loaded gun to a riot

Who knows if this is true, but if it is true it will be fascinating to watch the spin. We are always told "Antifa has never killed anybody and the far right has!". So if this is true, I see one of two tactics being used:

1- Move the goalposts and merely say "well, antifa hasn't killed *as many* as the far right".
2- Try to argue the guy wasn't a real member of antifa.

that he is a MASSIVE DUMBASS

I agree with that but not sure I agree with the rest. Mostly because ppl have BLM/Antifa fatigue from property destruction not the protests.

If they could have kept it to non violence they could have moved mountains politically now it's spoiled.

Originally posted by snowdragon
I agree with that but not sure I agree with the rest. Mostly because ppl have BLM/Antifa fatigue from property destruction not the protests.

If they could have kept it to non violence they could have moved mountains politically now it's spoiled.

That's I'm point I'm making. Property destruction and political harrassment ARE NOT VIEWED AS BAD AS MURDER in the public eye. I completely understand how it could be argued as such, considering that people are having a lifetime of effort and investment destroyed by the angry whims of ignorant reckless rioters, but in general, A BURNT STORE IS NOT VIEWED AS BAD AS A BULLET TO THE HEAD. That's just how the eye of public perception works. You can argue that it is unfair, but you can not deny that it is true, primarily because while a store can be rebuilt, a life can not be given back.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Put it like this, I DON'T have any sympathy for the people Kyle killed, as they were rioting, and as you are saying, they were rather legit bad people. HOWEVER, I don't feel bad for Kyle, nor will I defend him, because as stated, he had NO REASON to be there other than his personal adrenaline rush, considering the armored police presence, and he either did or REALLY REALLY SHOULD HAVE known the shitstorm he has getting into before he entered the state, and even if he was too young to consider his actions, he should have had an adult monitoring him, especially with an assault rifle involved.

As I have stated before, HE HAS MASSIVELY SABOTAGED TRUMP, and while he does have some supporters backing him for admittedly killing some bad folks who were admittedly trying to attack him , he also has MANY PEOPLE, most notably state officials, looking at him as a terrorist due to the context of him being there to begin with, and Trump seeming like his Fascist Demagogue, and it's a situation that DOESN'T NEED TO BE. Quite simply, if he didn't show up to that rally, either BLM would have killed someone there and had their credibility completely squashed, or it would have happened when Rand Paul got attacked. But now, simply because of Kyle's clear motive of an adrenaline rush, liberals now feel justified in their reckless rage, and he is essentially THE PERFECT STRAWMAN for liberals to secure the November victory.

This is why I keep harping. Even if he isn't a sadist, you have to at least acknowledge that he is a MASSIVE DUMBASS who COMPLETELY SABOTAGED AND POSSIBLY SINGLE-HABDEDLY KILLED HIS OWN CAUSE. It is ABSOLUTELY humiliating, and I don't see how it can be denied.

Quite simply, he should have stuck to being a keyboard warrior, but instead he wanted to be a wannabe warrior, and now not only is he being charged with war crimes, but his attack is also being taken as a declaration of war to all he supports. It is the EPITOME of waking a sleeping giant.

But you're not a retarded leftist, my friend. Most people are not retarded leftists who are on the left. It's not difficult at all to reason with you and you clearly know right from wrong.

I think only for those who were already entrenched with the anti-Trumper positions see Kyle's actions as harming "the cause." But those "causes" are too varied. Pro-gun rights, anti-rioting, anti-BLM, pro-peace-and-order, etc. Lots of difference causes that this could apply to. What Kyle's action did was earn quite a bit of praise from the right-wingers, leftists tired of the rioting and looting, and libertarians. And the backlash from Kyle's actions are earning the ire from those same groups.

Originally posted by Lestov16
That's I'm point I'm making. Property destruction and political harrassment ARE NOT VIEWED AS BAD AS MURDER in the public eye. I completely understand how it could be argued as such, considering that people are having a lifetime of effort and investment destroyed by the angry whims of ignorant reckless rioters, but in general, A BURNT STORE IS NOT VIEWED AS BAD AS A BULLET TO THE HEAD. That's just how the eye of public perception works. You can argue that it is unfair, but you can not deny that it is true.

Yup. It's why people view Texas' "you can kill someone stealing your property" law as being controversial or being too far - life and property are generally not equal in value.

I'm still not quite 100% how I feel about that Texas law. I can understand "both sides" of the argument. But the "Christian" side of me thinks that if someone is going to steal my shit, they probably need it more than I do. Unless they are stealing a dialysis machine from a loved one who needs it to live or something?

Originally posted by Lestov16
That's I'm point I'm making. Property destruction and political harrassment ARE NOT VIEWED AS BAD AS MURDER in the public eye. I completely understand how it could be argued as such, considering that people are having a lifetime of effort and investment destroyed by the angry whims of ignorant reckless rioters, but in general, A BURNT STORE IS NOT VIEWED AS BAD AS A BULLET TO THE HEAD. That's just how the eye of public perception works. You can argue that it is unfair, but you can not deny that it is true.

This wasn't murder though.

Originally posted by dadudemon
But you're not a retarded leftist, my friend. Most people are not retarded leftists who are on the left. It's not difficult at all to reason with you and you clearly know right from wrong.

I think only for those who were already entrenched with the anti-Trumper positions see Kyle's actions as harming "the cause." But those "causes" are too varied. Pro-gun rights, anti-rioting, anti-BLM, pro-peace-and-order, etc. Lots of difference causes that this could apply to. What Kyle's action did was earn quite a bit of praise from the right-wingers, leftists tired of the rioting and looting, and libertarians. And the backlash from Kyle's actions are earning the ire from those same groups.

Yup. It's why people view Texas' "you can kill someone stealing your property" law as being controversial or being too far - life and property are generally not equal in value.

I'm still not quite 100% how I feel about that Texas law. I can understand "both sides" of the argument. But the "Christian" side of me thinks that if someone is going to steal my shit, they probably need it more than I do. Unless they are stealing a dialysis machine from a loved one who needs it to live or something?

Life and property are not of equal value, which is why nobody should risk their lives trying to steal or destroy the property of others 👆

Originally posted by Lestov16
That's I'm point I'm making. Property destruction and political harrassment ARE NOT VIEWED AS BAD AS MURDER in the public eye. I completely understand how it could be argued as such, considering that people are having a lifetime of effort and investment destroyed by the angry whims of ignorant reckless rioters, but in general, A BURNT STORE IS NOT VIEWED AS BAD AS A BULLET TO THE HEAD. That's just how the eye of public perception works. You can argue that it is unfair, but you can not deny that it is true.

I am certainly not arguing against what you are saying here, I just said in the end it was self defense(not murder.) BUT my very fist post on this topic I said he shouldn't have been there.

My other point was that I'm not sure this is going to shift the favor more the the left because as you mentioned we have seen months and months of destruction from rioters (who spoiled it for the protesters assuming they are seperate.) Our media cycle spins to fast to keep Kyle relevant but BLM/Antifa keeps print moving daily. 🙁

It showcases the complete disaster of our media and how completely powerful they are (including social media.)

Originally posted by Surtur
Life and property are not of equal value, which is why nobody should risk their lives trying to steal or destroy the property of others 👆

haermm

Originally posted by dadudemon
But you're not a retarded leftist, my friend. Most people are not retarded leftists who are on the left. It's not difficult at all to reason with you and you clearly know right from wrong.

I think only for those who were already entrenched with the anti-Trumper positions see Kyle's actions as harming "the cause." But those "causes" are too varied. Pro-gun rights, anti-rioting, anti-BLM, pro-peace-and-order, etc. Lots of difference causes that this could apply to. What Kyle's action did was earn quite a bit of praise from the right-wingers, leftists tired of the rioting and looting, and libertarians. And the backlash from Kyle's actions are earning the ire from those same groups.

Yup. It's why people view Texas' "you can kill someone stealing your property" law as being controversial or being too far - life and property are generally not equal in value.

I'm still not quite 100% how I feel about that Texas law. I can understand "both sides" of the argument. But the "Christian" side of me thinks that if someone is going to steal my shit, they probably need it more than I do. Unless they are stealing a dialysis machine from a loved one who needs it to live or something?

I think that most people should just know not to phuck around in Texas. The weather is way too hot to be stressing those people out by touching their shit. You'll just be asking to be their rage cushion.