Originally posted by marcssands14
Lol I'm not whirly. I've been on here for about 6 yrs,just dont post alot. And I will probably stop posting altogether, now that I know how most of you feel about police shootings of unarmed black men.
You do know he raped a woman right? The house he went back too, was the house of the woman he raped!
The ****er should have been blown to pieces with a grenade as well.
I feel no sympathy for an actual rapist.
Originally posted by dadudemon
[B]Oh, what's up Ziggs.You know my position on this: I cannot take a hardline genetics stance against black people.
Not Hardline. Just considering what might be a missing piece of the puzzle along with culture. One people don't, or more importantly, don't want to consider.
It's because I've seen far too many black people not acting like animals to buy into the "it's in the genes" argument.
The vast majority aren't violent criminals, but that doesn't deny possibility of aggression being inherent.
The stance is that black populaces have a greater percentage of criminals, in the same way that black people are 1000 x more likely than other races to inherit sickle cell disease, despite a minority actually having that gene.
But you're correct that there are sub-groups of sub-Saharan Africans all over the place. Most African Americans were from West Africa. If you take a look at those countries, homicide rates are not as high as other African countries. When you think of "Ghana", you don't normally think of violence.
This does make matters more complicated, true.
So even if we go with the idea that sub-Saharan Africans are more violent than the average human ethnicity, then explain the relative lack of violent crime in Western Africa (where the slaves were mostly purchased and shipped from) and the preponderance of violent crime among African Americans in the US? Why aren't they as peaceful as their Western African relatives?
Is it possible that by selecting the strongest of bunch to be slaves, America also selected the most aggressive? As free T levels correlate with both and can predict violence in a person too. African Americans greater free T than whites, and I expect it's not purely an environmental difference.
Even when controlling for poverty, our African Americans are extremely violent.
This mostly (but not completely) eliminates a genetics argument. When you pull out nature from the equation, you're left with nurture. In this case, it is a culture that feeds on violence, egoism (machismo bullshit that the Italians had do deal with back in the day), shallow-worldly pursuits, etc.
I personally wouldn't hedge my bets on nature being the only argument, but here's a thought, perhaps it's the stricter culture of those countries in west africa, along with a patriarchal family structure, that inhibits people from committing crime? And instead, what we're seeing in a much more "liberated" and free culture, we're just seeing the nature of people expressed plainly.
Originally posted by JohnnyRotton
I personally wouldn't hedge my bets on nature being the only argument, but here's a thought, perhaps it's the stricter culture of those countries in west africa, along with a patriarchal family structure, that inhibits people from committing crime? And instead, what we're seeing in a much more "liberated" and free culture, we're just seeing the nature of people expressed plainly.
This actually cuts to the crux of it and we do have evidence for this argument.
As single parent homes increased, so did violent crime. While our black communities, prior to 1950, had a higher rate of violence and homicides compared to the white populations, it was far less than it is, now.
We saw the murders and murder rates skyrocket a mere 20 years after the Democrats successfully destroyed the black nuclear family. It was by the 1970s we started to see a severe murder problem in the US.
So, yes, what you posit here seems to be correct because it matches the data: we destroyed the black family structure and caused violent crime.
White people are not immune to this: young white men raised in single parent homes are more likely to be involved in drugs and violent crime, as well.
Originally posted by marcssands14
Lol I'm not whirly. I've been on here for about 6 yrs,just dont post alot. And I will probably stop posting altogether, now that I know how most of you feel about police shootings of unarmed black men.
Translation: you're going to stop posting because of statistics. Okay.
Do you want me to lie and say blacks commit less murder?
Originally posted by Surtur
Translation: you're going to stop posting because of statistics. Okay.Do you want me to lie and say blacks commit less murder?
Blacks commit far less crime of any kind when they come from two-parent (read: male and female) homes and were raised by the same two parents their entire childhood.
This even holds true when they come from poor homes. Two-parent homes are literally the best weapon we have to solve violent crime. By far.
Originally posted by dadudemonSo, yes, what you posit here seems to be correct because it matches the data: we destroyed the black family structure and caused violent crime.
White people are not immune to this: young white men raised in single parent homes are more likely to be involved in drugs and violent crime, as well.
Yes, but when we control for both poverty and single parent homes, do blacks still commit more crime than whites?
I don't have the data to hand, but I'm guessing the answer is yes.
If so, that might indicate there's more than just nurture at play.
It's important to denote why it happens though.
Leftists will insist that it's systemic racism is the reason, that black crime is the responsibilty and burden of whites. But this is unfounded and a dangerous idea. Black on white crime is high enough, we don't want perps to think they have justification in this arena too.
It's a number of factors and racism is waaaaaaaay down on the list.
It's culture and the lack of fathers in the home, combined with poverty. Though I guess you could maybe say the culture has adapted so the lack of fathers in the home is almost a part of the culture itself now.
But at the end of the day the culprit is def not "white people".
Originally posted by dadudemon
In everyone's defense, I don't know if anyone is voting for Trump that posts in the GDF.I'm not. Silent Master is not. I don't know if Surtur is.
I'm strongly leaning towards it at the moment and cowardly ittle b*tch ass f*cks like Lestov will not make me change my mind by making lame pathetic little threats online against people who support Trump. In fact, I just made a small donation to Trump's campaign yesterday (and am sure I will make bigger donations before election) so Lestov can take his idle threats and shove them where the sun doesn't shine.
As us Trumpers showed in 2016, we will not under any circumstance be bullied out of voting the way we want to vote. All threatening us does is make us want to vote Trump that much more. When we know we're in the right, nothing will convince us otherwise. Anti-Trump commie scum line Lestov are the ones on the wrong side of history, not Trump supporters.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Trump should have his face added to Mount Rushmore. Extremely impressed with his presidency so far. He has done a few things I don't like but as long as he doesn't do something really stupid like come out and say vaccines will be mandatory then I do plan on happily voting for him... again.
Also, pretty sure that Surtur, Broly, wxyz, and a few others are voting for Trump as well. And I also bet that there are plenty of more people on the forum planning to do so but they just don't care to come out and say it. 😉
Originally posted by JohnnyRotton
Yes, but when we control for both poverty and single parent homes, do blacks still commit more crime than whites?
Yes because "culture."
Originally posted by JohnnyRotton
I don't have the data to hand, but I'm guessing the answer is yes.If so, that might indicate there's more than just nurture at play.
Brings us full-circle - their West African relatives are not nearly as violent as they are.
Also, docile slaves were sell-able slaves. Unruly slaves were killed or died during their capture. Obedient, healthy, and hard working slaves were highly sought after.
Originally posted by Lestov16
😆 Y'all punk niggaz. PHUCK an olive branch. The only branch you fools need to worry about is the SPIKY BRANCH OF THE SHRIKE THAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO ETERNALLY HANG YOURSELVES ON, either when Biden wins and all Trump supporters get lynched, or when Trump wins and his idiocy has us bowing to Putin as all BLM supporters get lynched while North Korea nukes the planet. WORRY BOUT DEM' BRANCHES BYTCHES 😂 🤣 💃 😮💨If you need me, Ill be in the MVF, having a nice cold pint, waiting for all of this to blow over..... 😎
Fight me irl.
Kyle Rittenhouse's shooting looks to have divine intervention involved and divine punishment.
Look at what went down in the shooting:
Shot a strangler in the lungs.
Shot a pedo in the crotch.
Shot a burglar in the arm.
Cleared a gun malfunction in less than 2 seconds and shot the burglar dude in the arm - burglar dude had a gun drawn and was going to shoot Kyle. Kyle was on the ground fighting off multiple attackers at the time.
Too coincidental.
🙂
Originally posted by Surtur
Whites just commit less violent crime. It's a fact. People can piss and moan over it, they can create a myriad of excuses for it, but at the end of the day it is a fact.Anyone who can not handle this fact: turn off your computer and never turn it on again.
I would appreciate getting a source for what you call "fact". A source that doesnt come from Breitbart or any other far right extremist site . A factual site that's unbiased. Because as I remember based on the facts that whites are the majority in America and are more likely to commit more school shootings(and are more likely to be serial killers than other races),the reverse is true about this so called fact.