Let's review those questions again :
Alright, Putinbot.
It is a fact that IQ distribution is uneven between racial groups, and education differences can't explain the difference in american populations, why is that?It is a fact that scientists look at a persons genome and accurately predict a persons race with 99 % accuracy, why is that?
It is a fact that certain genes are more prevalent in certain racial groups, such as the gene for sickle cell disease being more prevalent in blacks, why is that?
Q1 is asking you to tell me what are the factors outside of genes that result in blacks from all over the world having a lower IQ even when you elliminate education
Q2 is asking why scientists can take genetic information alone, and accurately predict a persons identified race, which flies in the face of race being a social construct alone
Q3 is asking why there are in fact, some genes more prevalent in racical groups, despite the races being very genetically diverse
Originally posted by JohnnyRottonAgain your showing exactly why you don't understand.
Blacks are 1000x more likely than whites to have sickle cell disease though, that's a genetic disease and not a nurtured or cultured one.Blacks are much more likely to be lactose intolerant,
as well, explain this differnce between racial groups
Originally posted by JohnnyRottonYou still don't understand what's being explained to you, some traits are very simple and have few variants, these follow high school genetics. Like lactose intolerance or skin colour. Other traits are incredibly complex and have massive variation and high numbers of possible outcomes. Read this again it explains it very simply.
Then you're admitting that some genes are more prevalent in racial groups than others.concession accepted.
simple genes are far more prevalent in local populations than traits requiring complex mosaics.
Let me explain using the position of American Genetics and Science again.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!Please read the Scientific position of most geneticists.
You still don't understand what's being explained to you, some traits are very simple and have few variants, these follow high school genetics. Like lactose intolerance or skin colour. Other traits are incredibly complex and have massive variation and high numbers of possible outcomes. Read this again it explains it very simply.simple genes are far more prevalent in local populations than traits requiring complex mosaics.
that is not what the ASHG in that article actually. so I don't know why you felt the need to spam those oversized images again.
But seen as you do admit that genes can express differently in racial populations, you've conceded your position.
It doesn't matter whether those genes are complex or not.
Originally posted by JohnnyRottonAgain you're showing you don't understand the difference between simple genes and complex multi-gene traits.
that is not what the ASHG in that article actually. so I don't know why you felt the need to spam those oversized images again.But seen as you do admit that genes can express differently in racial populations, you've conceded your position.
It doesn't matter whether those genes are complex or not.
Let me explain again.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!