The Next Supreme Court Justice

I didn't miss your excuse, I dismissed it. Learn the difference for next time.

Originally posted by Surtur
I didn't miss your excuse, I dismissed it. Learn the difference for next time.

No, you are attempting to distract from your inability to retort the argument by changing the subject. Learn the difference for next time. You got your page flip though. Do you think it will stop people from going back to the previous page to see the argument you are running away from?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Preference has always been offensive. Your enduring and persistent attraction to members of the opposite sex is not a "preference." You do not "prefer" women more than men. You are oriented toward women to the exclusion of men. Describing sexuality as a preference is a way for conservatives to covertly call it a choice that they can deride and legislate.

First world problems.

Originally posted by Robtard
Barrett sounding like a 14 year old is why Republicans like her so much.

AOC sounding like a 6 year old is why lefties like you like her so much.

^He's not denying it...

But AOC doesn't sound like a 6 year old, you weirdo. You tried with your "no you!" retort. You. Tried.

....and I knew I was gonna like ACB even before I heard her speak because I knew she was a Conservative.

Also, she is not bad-looking at all, especially when compared to what RBG looked like lol.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
AOC sounding like a 6 year old is why lefties like you like her so much.

A 6 year old is more intelligent than AOC.

True.

pretty sure her clit is more intelligent than the two of you combined, yet half as sensitive...but that's none of my business *sips tea*

Aww, poor Bashy is triggered that we talked bad about his airheaded-idol... poor baby.

I'm surprised he likes anyone that old.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Preference has always been offensive. Your enduring and persistent attraction to members of the opposite sex is not a "preference." You do not "prefer" women more than men. You are oriented toward women to the exclusion of men. Describing sexuality as a preference is a way for conservatives to covertly call it a choice that they can deride and legislate.

My sexual preferences are short petite women or very tall athletic women. Obviously, both types beautiful.

But I'd still bang a average looking gal if she was super smart and kind. But they are not my preference.

My sexual preferences do not include fat women or women with poor hygiene: these two sets often overlap.

So who is offended by this? If anyone is offended by my sexual preferences, I am offended that they take offense to something I don't seem to be able to control.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm surprised he likes anyone that old.

the rules don't apply to you?

What rules?

okay let's find out if you're as special as you think you are

reported

What rule are you falsely claiming I broke?

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm surprised he likes anyone that old.

😆 🤣 😆

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
No, you are attempting to distract from your inability to retort the argument by changing the subject. Learn the difference for next time. You got your page flip though. Do you think it will stop people from going back to the previous page to see the argument you are running away from?

Lol, liberals...

Originally posted by Blakemore
I don't understand the argument, but the last few pages were painful to read, let alone interpret.

Adam's gaslighting and doing the "it's okay when our side does it" BS. It's pathetic. Either using the term "sexual preference" is wrong or it is not. There will absolutely be no "it's wrong, but more wrong when this one side does it". Hope that cleared it up 👆