The Next Supreme Court Justice

Originally posted by Newjak
Not really in the same vein. Actually what you did by pretending that we're making up new definitions disregarding terminology that means no words have meaning. It's kind of silly.

The left has a habit of redefining words. It didn't even start with websters dictionary changing the definition of sexual preference cuz babies cried.

They've legit tried to change the definition of racism too. They've tried to say minorities can't be racist cuz they lack power. It's weird.

You guys seriously need to be forbidden from reading 1984 ever again.

Originally posted by Surtur
However you need to spin it. I wasn't trying to distract, but if I was you fell for it. Instead of just going "yeah we should use a different term" you doubled down for several pages before ultimately achieving nothing.

^The expected pretend win after all of Surt's points have been taken apart.

Originally posted by Newjak
Why do we need to use a different term if you understood what was trying to be said?

So if you understood and wasn't trying to distract you basically just admitted you knew what the attention was and just got hung up on the fact we weren't using the terminology you wanted in this instance?

Which means you're either a terrible grammar nazi or just trying to distract.

I understand the games being played, which is why you need to use a different term.

It's an attempt to conflate filling vacant seats with adding new seats.

And the dude will not abide 🙂

Originally posted by Silent Master
You are making up new definitions though, no pretending required.

Originally posted by Robtard
^The expected pretend win after all of Surt's points have been taken apart.

^This post needs to be put in a museum. The lack of self awareness...the sheer self own of accusing one of having a pretend win while pretend winning...magnifique!

Originally posted by Robtard
^The expected pretend win after all of Surt's points have been taken apart.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
So like a Ben Shapiro lite faced with a good interviewer.

Rob's digging himself a hole here so maybe this isn't the right time to come suck his dick.

Originally posted by Newjak
Why do we need to use a different term if you understood what was trying to be said?

So if you understood and wasn't trying to distract you basically just admitted you knew what the attention was and just got hung up on the fact we weren't using the terminology you wanted in this instance?

Which means you're either a terrible grammar nazi or just trying to distract.

It's to distract from his previous failed positions.

Originally posted by Robtard
^The expected pretend win after all of Surt's points have been taken apart.

It's funny to me the mind of someone that tries to distort reality.

Originally posted by Newjak
Yup and now he gets to pretend the GOP didn't do silly stuff and that the same arguments the GOP used can be used to the Democrats expanding the courts.

It's funny to me the mind of someone that tries to distort reality.

Lol. I never said the GOP didn't do silly stuff. So why be such a disingenuous little shit?

Originally posted by Surtur
^This post needs to be put in a museum. The lack of self awareness...the sheer self own of accusing one of having a pretend win while pretend winning...magnifique!

Originally posted by Newjak
The irony

So a "no you" now? Yikes.

Originally posted by Newjak
😬 Not really. The fact you somehow think this a clandestine definition if ignored changed the very definition of all words is silly at best. Idiotic at worst.

Yes, really.

Originally posted by Newjak
Yup and now he gets to pretend the GOP didn't do silly stuff and that the same arguments the GOP used can be used to the Democrats expanding the courts.

It's funny to me the mind of someone that tries to distort reality.

They're a silly lot, the whole lot of them

eg

"Use my words against me" - Lindsey Graham 2016

*uses his own words against him in 2020*

"I meant something else!" - Lindsey Graham 2020

Originally posted by Newjak
Yup and now he gets to pretend the GOP didn't do silly stuff and that the same arguments the GOP used can be used to the Democrats expanding the courts.

It's funny to me the mind of someone that tries to distort reality.

Lol. This is what I mean when I say the mods are retired.

There can be no "well you can't lie about other posters" and then this stuff is allowed.

Originally posted by Robtard
They're a silly lot, the whole lot of them

eg

"Use my words against me" - Lindsey Graham 2016

*uses his own words against him in 2020*

"I meant something else!" - Lindsey Graham 2020

Just like you "meant something else" when you said packing the court?

Originally posted by Newjak
I still laugh at that one. Also when he went on Fox to beg for money.

He went on more than just Fox begging for money because his opponent is out-raising him. Graham begged hi and low.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol. This is what I mean when I say the mods are retired.

There can be no "well you can't lie about other posters" and then this stuff is allowed.