Democrats Threaten New Impeachment to Stop SCOTUS

Started by jaden_2.04 pages
Originally posted by Surtur

Anyways, pathetic souls on this board have gone with the logic of "but the implications tho" so if you want to call their logic retarded, please do so it would delight me. Shall you?

Like you just did?

For me either choice is immaterial, but I'd love for you to make one.

Is the logic retarded yay or nay?

You tell me. You just employed that logic.

Okay so you dodge and we move on.

Probably best you do. You just called yourself retarded.

For the record, I don't think you're retarded, Surt.

I get it man. You're itching for a bingo.

Someone will scratch that itch.

I leave that stuff to The Warriors and Baseball Furies of KMC.

CAN YOU DIG IT?

Miss the days when microphones looked like chupa chups.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Miss the days when microphones looked like chupa chups.

Look like someone is trying to sneak a large marble in their skinny dick's foreskin.

Originally posted by Newjak
I mean if the Republicans aren't going to play by the rules they set why should the Democrats not also play hardball?

What rules are they not playing by? I read the constitution recently and it seems they are playing by the rules to the T.

I suggest you read it

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
What rules are they not playing by? I read the constitution recently and it seems they are playing by the rules to the T.

I suggest you read it

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Probably best you do. You just called yourself retarded.

For the record, I don't think you're retarded, Surt.

😆

Originally posted by Surtur
Which rules aren't they playing by?

Do not try to say the rules from 2016, cuz they said multiple times that was because the senate and white house were held by different parties which is not the case now.

But I'm sure besides that you had a different rule they didn't follow in mind and I'd love to hear about it.

That's your deflection argument? That's a weak side step at best Surtur.

So I imagined all of those videos where the GOP doesn't once mention this is because of who owns the Senate?

Seriously though they made it clear. If it's an election year new Supreme Court nominees should wait until after the Presidential Election.

Senator Graham even said we should use his rant about this topic against him haha.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
What rules are they not playing by? I read the constitution recently and it seems they are playing by the rules to the T.

I suggest you read it

So then they weren't playing by the rules in 2016 by forcing us to wait until after the election.

Either way they are clear cut hypocrites. There is no defense of this. 😬

Originally posted by Newjak
That's your deflection argument? That's a weak side step at best Surtur.

So I imagined all of those videos where the GOP doesn't once mention this is because of who owns the Senate?

Seriously though they made it clear. If it's an election year new Supreme Court nominees should wait until after the Presidential Election.

Senator Graham even said we should use his rant about this topic against him haha.

Pay no mind to their shit-weasel speak, it's to be expected. Cowardly, but expected.

They're not playing by the very rules they insisted America should play by in an election year, this is also to be expected as McConnell said as much as year+ ago.

Originally posted by Newjak
So then they weren't playing by the rules in 2016 by forcing us to wait until after the election.

Either way they are clear cut hypocrites. There is no defense of this. 😬

Actually there is. In 2016 Senate controlled it, they disagreed with Obama’s pick.

This is 2020, the senate can chose to agreement or disagree with his pick

Originally posted by Robtard
Pay no mind to their shit-weasel speak, it's to be expected. Cowardly, but expected.

They're not playing by the very rules they insisted America should play by in an election year, this is also to be expected as McConnell said as much as year+ ago.

Yeah the fact they get to play by different rules then they set for others always works out well for a country 😂

That's why I plan on moving out of this country within the year.

McConnell specifically said not to nominate someone to the Supreme Court in an election year if the opposite party was in the Senate.

That isn't the case now, so no contradiction.

But I'm not surprised the Democrats and Media don't get it.

They're not the brightest.

@broly

😂 oh that's a good one. They specifically said in 2016 that they needed to wait to hear from the American people after they voted for the President.

So if what you say is true they are hypocrites and liars 😂