The Most Privileged People In Our Society are Funding its Destruction

Wealthy Corporations and Celebrities funding the chaos in America

Just one example, Cosmopolitan Magazine owned business Hearst Publications an $11 billion a year company is help funding the violence and looting and offering bail money to anyone arrested.

Link

Go woke, go broke.

The temporary social capital gained is not worth the long term repercussions once society has restabilized.

The next cosmopolitan article will say something like: 10 blowjob techniques you can do while your man is throwing bricks through small businesses windows.

Yes, nothing to do with systemic racism in your Police and social structures of course.

Establishment Democrats going to Democrat

Bail is shit and needs to go away.

Originally posted by BackFire
Bail is shit and needs to go away.

Guilty until you can pay to be innocent.

Originally posted by BackFire
Bail is shit and needs to go away.

So when someone kills someone they should just be let out immediately to do it again?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So when someone kills someone they should just be let out immediately to do it again?

So, if someone kills someone but has money to post bail then they should go free ?

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Anyways, look into blackstones ratio.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Kmc is really important to me. Every day i look at the profiles whose birthday it is and alot of them were last online in 2008 anr this produces a strange emotion in me similar to loss and nostalgia. I dont know how to connect with people and im not really keen on subtle social cues. I think everyone is doing what they think is best or right and that's disheartening to me. I hope everything turns out okay.

Lol nobody can engage.

There is no such thing as systemic racism and/or white privilege.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So when someone kills someone they should just be let out immediately to do it again?

Of course not. Don’t ask stupid questions. But whether someone is able to get out should have nothing to do with money. It should be about the risk they pose and nothing more.

If a rich person and a poor person both commit the same crime the rich person should not be allowed to walk free while the poor person sits in jail during the trial.

Originally posted by BackFire
Of course not. Don’t ask stupid questions. But whether someone is able to get out should have nothing to do with money. It should be about the risk they pose and nothing more.

If a rich person and a poor person both commit the same crime the rich person should not be allowed to walk free while the poor person sits in jail during the trial.

Sorry, but that logic doesn't gel with our penal system that is designed to favor the wealthiest people.

Originally posted by Robtard
Sorry, but that logic doesn't gel with our penal system that is designed to favor the wealthiest people.

So why do you suck up to the rich?

Originally posted by BackFire
Of course not. Don’t ask stupid questions. But whether someone is able to get out should have nothing to do with money. It should be about the risk they pose and nothing more.

If a rich person and a poor person both commit the same crime the rich person should not be allowed to walk free while the poor person sits in jail during the trial.

You’re stupid😉

Serious not. Who decides the judge I guess?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So why do you suck up to the rich?

^Guy who voted for a billionaire because that was the 'highest qualification' to be POTUS. Can't make this stuff up.

Also, do stop asking stupid questions, consider this your first and only warning.

Originally posted by Robtard
^Guy who voted for a billionaire because that was the highest qualification. Can't make this stuff up.

Also, do stop asking stupid questions, considering this your first and only warning.

Says the guy voting for a millionaire

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
You’re stupid😉

Serious not. Who decides the judge I guess?

Judges currently decide it. Whether someone gets bail and the amount of bail is based on their risk level as decided by the judge.

The whole concept is really silly if you think about it. If someone is a threat to run or hurt someone then no amount of money should allow them to get out. However if someone is not a threat to run or engage in violence or commit more crimes then they should not have to pay to be free during their trial.

Originally posted by BackFire
Judges currently decide it. Whether someone gets bail and the amount of bail is based on their risk level as decided by the judge.

The whole concept is really silly if you think about it. If someone is a threat to run or hurt someone then no amount of money should allow them to get out. However if someone is not a threat to run or engage in violence or commit more crimes then they should not have to pay to be free during their trial.

Well said.

Originally posted by BackFire
Judges currently decide it. Whether someone gets bail and the amount of bail is based on their risk level as decided by the judge.

The whole concept is really silly if you think about it. If someone is a threat to run or hurt someone then no amount of money should allow them to get out. However if someone is not a threat to run or engage in violence or commit more crimes then they should not have to pay to be free during their trial.

Yea you are right, but most "justice" or what is perceived as "justice" is stupid.