FBIs desire to take down Trump and his associates at any cost

Started by BrolyBlack2 pages

Originally posted by dadudemon
According to the Intelligence Committee investigation and the Mueller report, they also believe Trump did nothing wrong. It's stated very clearly in the 400+ page Mueller Report, multiple times, in fact.

Wondering why no one has taken the time to read it like I did?

Because it never says “this report exonerated Trump” they say he’s guilty

In the near 350 years of America no prosecution has ever exonerated its subject

woops wrong thread.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I’ve been saying this since the beginning. Rob thinks attacking a few corrupt agents is attacking the FBI as a whole.

I've been working with the FBI on and off for years and known FBI folks for over a decade. Not a single one of them would be caught doing stupid shit like this even if their life was threatened. They'd rather die than compromise their morals like this especially since it destroys the sanctity and integrity of the country (it's treason).

I really cannot understand what was going through those FBI personnels' heads. Are they agents?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Because it never says “this report exonerated Trump” they say he’s guilty

In the near 350 years of America no prosecution has ever exonerated its subject

It does say quite clearly that Trump was not involved or had no knowledge, though, when it gets to any of the bad stuff. That's just another way of saying "exonerated", imo.

Sure, there's wiggle room for evidence that they may not have where Trump may have been involved or had knowledge of something which is why a lawyer would not take a hardline stance that Trump was exonerated.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Because it never says “this report exonerated Trump” they say he’s guilty

In the near 350 years of America no prosecution has ever exonerated its subject

Near 250 years. I assume you just made a typo.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Near 250 years. I assume you just made a typo.

If you go back to colonial times, 1670 had colonial laws that they followed; some of which was condified into formal laws when they became cities and states. They followed a lot of the English Law stuff which is where we got our Bill of Rights. That might be what he's talking about.

By 1650, the Colonial American population was over 50K. That's a lot of settlements and people, back then.

Yes, I know all that but the nation wasn't officially created till 1776-77.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Yes, I know all that but the nation wasn't officially created till 1776-77.

Since he said "America" and "prosecution", we have colonial law and colonial cases going back 350+ years. In this instance, it would be the most correct to state 350 years considering some modern court cases have made reference to colonial period precedence. The reason is due to the laws being based on colonial period laws and in order to understand original intent and the history of those modern laws (based on those colonial laws), you have to understand the origins. It doesn't stop there: some court cases require going back to pre-1600s England to fully understand the laws at play in a case. Not kidding.

But, yes, for America, referring to legal cases, 350 years would be the most appropriate time period.

And since Broly refers to prosecution, we have criminal prosecutions (asset disputes and crime were pretty much the only types of cases seen in the colonial period) going back more than 350 years.

Ok, it's not really that big of a deal. I just thought he made a typo. Maybe I was wrong. You didn't have to go thru the trouble of typing out such a long post over something so trivial, ddd, but that's fine.

You are both correct no need to split hairs.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
A lawfully elected President is not above Investigation or the Law.

TheFederalist is a far Right outlet known to promote whackjob conspiracy theories and use pseudoscience to support its stories. It once published a piece defending Roy Moore (GA Republican who lost in 2018) in his 30's having sexual relations with girls as young as 14, claiming it was okay if a man wants to have a large family.

So this just looks like more "It's the deep state!" barking again.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I've been working with the FBI on and off for years and known FBI folks for over a decade. Not a single one of them would be caught doing stupid shit like this even if their life was threatened. They'd rather die than compromise their morals like this especially since it destroys the sanctity and integrity of the country (it's treason).

I really cannot understand what was going through those FBI personnels' heads. Are they agents?

Hey, I'm sure your average CIA spook would never think of doing the abhorrent MK Ultra shite, or spying on our own people.

Or your rank and file Department of Defense employee would be horrified at the fact we dropped radiation on fringe towns, and fed irradiated food to conscientious objectors. All documented.

You know how it works, it's always some arsehole in the chain doing the really unethical stuff, often in conjunction with some corrupt politicians or morally bankrupt businessmen/eggheads..

Originally posted by Robtard
TheFederalist is a far Right outlet known to promote whackjob conspiracy theories and use pseudoscience to support its stories. It once published a piece defending Roy Moore (GA Republican who lost in 2018) in his 30's having sexual relations with girls as young as 14, claiming it was okay if a man wants to have a large family.

So this just looks like more "It's the deep state!" barking again.

They didn’t write these texts or make the agents take out insurance when they got caught

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Ok, it's not really that big of a deal. I just thought he made a typo. Maybe I was wrong. You didn't have to go thru the trouble of typing out such a long post over something so trivial, ddd, but that's fine.

Correcting correctors is kind of one of the things I'm known for. Nothing personal. Supra said we are both right which actually means you were right about the typo which really means Supra was being nice to me and I was wrong but I could technically be correct and his typo would be technically the most correct.

🙂

See, my ego is not so huge I can't admit to being wrong. WEEEEE!

Originally posted by dadudemon
Correcting correctors is kind of one of the things I'm known for. Nothing personal. Supra said we are both right which actually means you were right about the typo which really means Supra was being nice to me and I was wrong but I could technically be correct and his typo would be technically the most correct.

🙂

See, my ego is not so huge I can't admit to being wrong. WEEEEE!

Don’t you dare talk about Lestov though. He will threaten to kill you.

Originally posted by Robtard
TheFederalist is a far Right outlet known to promote whackjob conspiracy theories and use pseudoscience to support its stories. It once published a piece defending Roy Moore (GA Republican who lost in 2018) in his 30's having sexual relations with girls as young as 14, claiming it was okay if a man wants to have a large family.

So this just looks like more "It's the deep state!" barking again.

^Didn't prove the article wrong

More documents coming out Monday.

If these agents were so in the right why were they scared shitless of being caught and took out professional liability insurance