Originally posted by SurturWell I agree with you there, except I don't think a man should force a woman to have another life form in her for 9 months if she doesn't want it. That's not fair. But yeah, I'm all for equality, but I allso understand basic biology. You know? A man can shirk responsibility, in my opinion, but it's still attached to her body, so it's not his right to force an abortion.
My argument is you can't allow the woman to shirk all responsibility for the baby but not the man. If he wants it and she doesn't she can snuff it out. If he doesn't want it and she does she can get him forced to pay for the kid.It's called equality son. Embrace it. Either both can shirk responsibility or neither.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaeYou do realise they feed off of the mother, right?
It's her choice to have another human being murdered.... a defenseless innocent one who has never harmed another person and didn't ask to be conceived and who now has to needlessly suffer and die because she was irresponsible... yeah, that sounds totally fair and completely moral. 🙄Nevermind the fact that every person is supposed to have an inherent fundamental right to life, right?
I see you're still trying to desperately deflect away from the fact you called Hitler a "decent person."
****ing hell, women kill their eggs every month and men kill sperm every time they cum.
Originally posted by Grand-Moff-Gav
I promise you it will. Your interaction with this person will not be in the slightest bit significant for you as life moves on.
No, if you think I will forget that he called Hitler a "decent person" then you're deluding yourself. I may not bring it up everytime he posts but I assure you I will never forget it while I'm still alive and have a healthy mind.
I agree with your last sentence though... it will not affect me personally at all. Just as everything else posted on this forum does not affect my personal life in the slightest.
Originally posted by Blakemore
Well I agree with you there, except I don't think a man should force a woman to have another life form in her for 9 months if she doesn't want it. That's not fair. But yeah, I'm all for equality, but I allso understand basic biology. You know? A man can shirk responsibility, in my opinion, but it's still attached to her body, so it's not his right to force an abortion.You do realise they feed off of the mother, right?
****ing hell, women kill their eggs every month and men kill sperm every time they cum.
You seem confused. I am not saying a man should be able to force an abortion. But he should be able to abdicate all responsibility for the child if he doesn't want it.
For a woman, shirking responsibility would mean snuffing out the kid, for the man it would be just not paying to support the child. A man should be able to sign away all rights and responsibilities to the child. So no visitation rights, but no child support either.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaeIn my opinion Ethneo your "rage" over an obvious joke, commented on as an obvious joke by myself and a moderator is somewhat dramatic. I am not saying you are creating errata, but to an observer it could certainly be interpreted that way.
No, if you think I will forget that he called Hitler a "decent person" then you're deluding yourself. I may not bring it up everytime he posts but I assure you I will never forget it while I'm still alive and have a healthy mind.I agree with your last sentence though... it will not affect me personally at all. Just as everything else posted on this forum does not affect my personal life in the slightest.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
In my opinion Ethneo your "rage" over an obvious joke, commented on as an obvious joke by myself and a moderator is somewhat dramatic. I am not saying you are creating errata, but to an observer it could certainly be interpreted that way.
So yeah, you're not going to be consistent here. I'm shocked.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
In my opinion Ethneo your "rage" over an obvious joke, commented on as an obvious joke by myself and a moderator is somewhat dramatic. I am not saying you are creating errata, but to an observer it could certainly be interpreted that way.
I'm not raging. Just pointing out that if that was indeed a joke it wasn't a very funny one. You still haven't answered the question: you think people who make jokes like that have a sick sense of humor yes or no?