What Will Robtard Do After Trump's Victory Tuesday

The courts have largely been rejecting Trump’s lawsuits.

His two wins were letting observers get a little closer and justice Alito reinforcing Pennsylvania to do something they were already doing.

The Supreme Court is very unlikely to weigh in on this. They don’t want to be seen as partisan hacks. The best case scenario for Trump is that votes received after Election Day won’t be allowed to be counted, which won’t make a difference.

Reports are now that Trump is privately beginning to understand that he has truly lost the election. He plans to let the lawsuits play out and will then concede, in his own Trumpy way, I’m sure.

Originally posted by BackFire
The courts have largely been rejecting Trump’s lawsuits.

His two wins were letting observers get a little closer and justice Alito reinforcing Pennsylvania to do something they were already doing.

The Supreme Court is very unlikely to weigh in on this. They don’t want to be seen as partisan hacks. The best case scenario for Trump is that votes received after Election Day won’t be allowed to be counted, which won’t make a difference.

Reports are now that Trump is privately beginning to understand that he has truly lost the election. He plans to let the lawsuits play out and will then concede, in his own Trumpy way, I’m sure.

What about the most important lawsuit of them all: the 800,000 votes that were collected and counted after the deadline in PA?

Originally posted by dadudemon
What about the most important lawsuit of them all: the 800,000 votes that were collected and counted after the deadline in PA?

https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2020/11/07/trump-campaign-pa-lawsuit-thrown-out/

Originally posted by dadudemon
What about the most important lawsuit of them all: the 800,000 votes that were collected and counted after the deadline in PA?

Update:

I looked all over the internet and I don't find where the late votes case has been decided on.

But I do find that there is conflict about adhering to the court orders to separate out ballots received after the voting deadline.

This is bad news for all parties as this does not give the election closure and could result in this going to Congress/Supreme Court.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/07/pennsylvania-election-lawsuit-counties-segregating-late-ballots/6201926002/

Recounts issued for Wisconsin. And ballots are not be segregated in PA.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Update:

I looked all over the internet and I don't find where the late votes case has been decided on.

But I do find that there is conflict about adhering to the court orders to separate out ballots received after the voting deadline.

This is bad news for all parties as this does not give the election closure and could result in this going to Congress/Supreme Court.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/07/pennsylvania-election-lawsuit-counties-segregating-late-ballots/6201926002/

Recounts issued for Wisconsin. And ballots are not be segregated in PA.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Oh DDM, why do you do these things to yourself... 🙄 It was tossed out.

https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2020/11/07/trump-campaign-pa-lawsuit-thrown-out/

Originally posted by dadudemon
Update:

I looked all over the internet and I don't find where the late votes case has been decided on.

But I do find that there is conflict about adhering to the court orders to separate out ballots received after the voting deadline.

This is bad news for all parties as this does not give the election closure and could result in this going to Congress/Supreme Court.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/07/pennsylvania-election-lawsuit-counties-segregating-late-ballots/6201926002/

Recounts issued for Wisconsin. And ballots are not be segregated in PA.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Update:

I looked all over the internet and I don't find where the late votes case has been decided on.

But I do find that there is conflict about adhering to the court orders to separate out ballots received after the voting deadline.

This is bad news for all parties as this does not give the election closure and could result in this going to Congress/Supreme Court.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/07/pennsylvania-election-lawsuit-counties-segregating-late-ballots/6201926002/

Recounts issued for Wisconsin. And ballots are not be segregated in PA.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
teehee 🙂 x2 with different posts. No one will be going to get anything changed by the Supreme Court, the late votes were already being kept separate when the Supreme Court gave the edict and Biden doesn't need those votes.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Update:

I looked all over the internet and I don't find where the late votes case has been decided on.

But I do find that there is conflict about adhering to the court orders to separate out ballots received after the voting deadline.

This is bad news for all parties as this does not give the election closure and could result in this going to Congress/Supreme Court.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/07/pennsylvania-election-lawsuit-counties-segregating-late-ballots/6201926002/

Recounts issued for Wisconsin. And ballots are not be segregated in PA.

Originally posted by BackFire
The courts have largely been rejecting Trump’s lawsuits.

His two wins were letting observers get a little closer and justice Alito reinforcing Pennsylvania to do something they were already doing.

The Supreme Court is very unlikely to weigh in on this. They don’t want to be seen as partisan hacks. The best case scenario for Trump is that votes received after Election Day won’t be allowed to be counted, which won’t make a difference.

Reports are now that Trump is privately beginning to understand that he has truly lost the election. He plans to let the lawsuits play out and will then concede, in his own Trumpy way, I’m sure.

Yup. Some people need to accept that Trump lost. While it's rare that the incumbent loses as they the advantage, it happens.

He'll concede by not really conceding.

Edit: I googled, Trump is only the 10th president to go into the one-term-loser basket.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yup. Some people need to accept that Trump lost. While it's rare that the incumbent loses as they the advantage, it happens.

He'll concede by not really conceding.

Edit: I googled, Trump is only the 10th president to go into the one-term-loser basket.

They don't count people who were killed or died as they didn't lose their run for a second term.

Does Ford count?

I believe he would. He ran for a second and got aethered because he pardoned the corrupt Richard Nixon.

Does Cleveland count twice?

Don't think so

I guess technically he won a second term.

This thread is gold! 😂

🙂

Wow Rob really triggered peeps.

Also trust LOB to give that stupid a prediction 1 week before the election when Trump was far behind in all the polls.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Wow Rob really triggered peeps.

Also trust LOB to give that stupid a prediction 1 week before the election when Trump was far behind in all the polls.

But yes still a stupid predication that did not age well.