yeah...i would guess those are too ingrained in the game to remove or modified....I think?
I'm guessing its combat related...or they fix or improve the planet hopping parts. I also hope they make changes to planet scanning in ME2 and ME3....those were quite dull.
Also..probably work with load times and such...maybe remove a few loading screens that are needed (planet stuff....)
Originally posted by Smasandian
That's promising if true. It's makes sense that Mass Effect 1 would be the most modified of the three...I assume fixing up the combat system to put more inline with the second two games.
Give the first game a reasonable inventory management, decent combat similar to ME3 and a functional cover system and we're golden.
May 14th.
Key points
- ME1 weapons are not tied to classes...you can use any weapon but only classes dedicated to that weapon can be trained. I like this change...
- inventory system is being worked on but nothing major will occur.
- bunch of improvements to movement, AI and etc...probably to be more inline with 2nd and 3rd.
- Extended Cut is the ending of the series.
- Universal Character Creator...makes sense....
- all DLC except for Pinnacle Station...due to how PS3 did not have it because source dat was corrupted.
- load times on new systems will be reduce drastically
Graphics look good from the trailer..the only thing I really noticed was Citadel map from ME1 looks pretty darn good.
While I fully understand that they can't have Pinnacle Station included (and to be fair, I don't consider it a great loss), I'm a bit wary of them going back and changing certain cutscenes:
The relevant part:
‘I do think a lot of things have evolved since [the original games] but I don’t know if I would say we were ultra-concerned about it or anything like that, but there were considerations’, admits Walters. ‘Kevin actually called out some camera cuts that were just… why was that focusing on Miranda’s butt? So in some cases we said, ‘Okay, we can make a change there’. But ultimately, to change an entire character model or something like that wasn’t really… it was a decision that was made as part of many creative decisions and just showing it at the best possible fidelity that we could going forward is really the choice for all of the art that we had.‘
And sure, people will say "well, it's just Miranda's ass", but tbh, I'm now wondering what they might have sneakily changed without telling us.
Originally posted by -Pr-
While I fully understand that they can't have Pinnacle Station included (and to be fair, I don't consider it a great loss), I'm a bit wary of them going back and changing certain cutscenes:The relevant part:
And sure, people will say "well, it's just Miranda's ass", but tbh, I'm now wondering what they might have sneakily changed without telling us.
I'm puzzled on how things have "evolved". Last I checked, heterosexual males like a nice ass now, as much as they did when the game was made.
Originally posted by Smasandian
Because it most cases, there is no point of the shot. If I remember correctly, Mass Effect had some of that....if it's part of romance scene...then sure.But you know...talking about how the Reapers are going to **** shit up and boom, a full on shot of Miranda's ass..it serves no purpose.
Sure it serves a purpose.
Guys buy more games then women, and guys like a little titillation. Oldest trick in the book.
Far as I can see, the exact same audience then, is the audience keeping video games afloat now. Mostly hetero males with a bookmark full of porn links. Same types oogling slave girl princess Leia in 1983.