Now Trump has gone: Let's talk about Institutional racism.

Started by Old Man Whirly!3 pages

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Look up the original sub-title of Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" book before it was removed from the updated newer versions.

He may not have specifically said that the white race was the "most evolved" but it was clear from the book's sub-title that he thought that certain races were "more favored" than others.

Also keep in mind the year when the book was published: 1859.

Remember what was going on in that time period?

It's not hard to draw a conclusion from that exactly which "race" he thought was the most evolved.

From the Royal Society... ffs, more evidence fo why youtube videos are not a good source of info.
durwank
The term ‘race’ was a synonym for ‘variety’, ‘breed’ or ‘form’. Surprisingly, it (or the plural ‘races’) was used much less frequently in the text of The Origin (in this particular meaning) than ‘variety’ (or ‘varieties’), ‘breed(s)’ or ‘form(s)’. Furthermore, ‘race’ had anthropological connotations, whereas Darwin avoided, in The Origin, the subject of humans, ‘as so surrounded with prejudices’.58 The question of human races was even ‘blowing up as an emotive issue in the 1850s’.59 So why did Darwin choose this particular, not unproblematic word for his subtitle instead of a more neutral and, in the text of The Origin, more common alternative such as ‘variety’?60 One possible explanation is that he wanted to make the link with the artificial selection of races of domesticated plants and animals (for a second possible explanation, see below). Indeed, in the text of The Origin, he often used the phrase ‘domestic race’. Also, the second part of his Essay of 1844 was headed ‘On the evidence favourable and opposed to the view that species are naturally formed races, descended from common stocks’ (my italics). Likewise, in his Sketch of 1842, he promised that a discussion of ‘whether the characters and relations of animated beings are such as favour the idea of wild species being races descended from a common stock’ would form ‘the second part of this sketch’.61

You are parody trolling but obviously Darwinian concepts are completed outdated anyway as he had no knowledge of the process of Transmission, Mendel was needed for that or how the code worked...

Yeah, I thought even if the book was titled "the origin of races" it was referring to species and not skin colour.

Ethneo even admits he didn't say "the white race" 😂

Adam Smith is another British philosopher; he believed in "the race of labourers."

That happens to be the foundation of our modern economic system, especially in the US.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Yeah, I thought even if the book was titled "the origin of races" it was referring to species and not skin colour.

Ethneo even admits he didn't say "the white race" 😂

Adam Smith is another British philosopher; he believed in "the race of labourers."

That happens to be the foundation of our modern economic system, especially in the US.

Ethneo is just trolling... 😂

Yeah, we're wasting our time.

That is not what Darwin believed, pooty. "Favored races" is a racist thing to say no matter how you try to spin it.You're trying to downplay it by claiming Darwin thought different "races" were just different varieties of humans.

While it is true that all humans are just different skin colors due to the amount of melanin in the skin that is not what Darwin was saying there.

He was a blatant racist.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
That is not what Darwin believed, pooty. "Favored races" is a racist thing to say no matter how you try to spin it.You're trying to downplay it by claiming Darwin thought different "races" were just different varieties of humans.

While it is true that all humans are just different skin colors due to the amount of melanin in the skin that is not what Darwin was saying there.

He was a blatant racist.

You are either rally thick or trolling durwank I'm taking option 2. 🙂

Originally posted by Blakemore
Yeah, we're wasting our time.
👆 He is clearly multiple parody accounts.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
You are either rally thick or trolling durwank I'm taking option 2. 🙂

Nah you're the one trolling as usual. Just look at all of the trolling orange man bad threads you've made today.

You're an idiot if you don't see how Darwin's sub-title was racist, and I can't help you if you're gonna be so willingly ignorant.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink... smh.

Darwin was racist as f***.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Nah you're the one trolling as usual. Just look at all of the trolling orange man bad threads you've made today.

You're an idiot if you don't see how Darwin's sub-title was racist, and I can't help you if you're gonna be so willingly ignorant.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink... smh.

Darwin was racist as f***.

It would help if you provided source material.

This Time Article does a pretty good job explaining it.

No it doesn't.

You have allowed things to clowd your judement, you are a rich white guy who married I assume a middle class girl of color and had a kid. You are literally the piece that squaks the most over what doesn't equist while living the life.

Originally posted by snowdragon
No it doesn't.

You have allowed things to clowd your judement, you are a rich white guy who married I assume a middle class girl of color and had a kid. You are literally the piece that squaks the most over what doesn't equist while living the life.

Nah, she's richer than me... 🙂 I find your excuse and accusations easy ones from the mindset that everyone can have what I have, but they can't my first post probably clarifies it better than that article. 🙂 I know how lucky and privileged I am... I can also see how much less others have. Including racism.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Nah, she's richer than me... 🙂 I find your excuse and accusations easy ones from the mindset that everyone can have what I have, but they can't my first post probably clarifies it better than that article. 🙂 I know how lucky and privileged I am... I can also see how much less others have. Including racism.

How hard can it be for you to put race aside at least in the usa and put class in it's place? Ironic that you don't live here and base what you believe on alot of ancedotal evidence.

I live in the usa and I have a mixed family. My wife is from belize so my son enjoys mixed heritage in the middle of the bible belt.

Originally posted by snowdragon
How hard can it be for you to put race aside at least in the usa and put class in it's place? Ironic that you don't live here and base what you believe on alot of ancedotal evidence.

I live in the usa and I have a mixed family. My wife is from belize so my son enjoys mixed heritage in the middle of the bible belt.

Class and race are interesting as is the relationship between sex class and race. A wealthy black woman will always be in a better position than a poor white man but not as good a position as a rich black man, but a poor white man will usually be better off than a poor black woman, who will often be better off than a poor black man in chances as well as economically. Obviously, a wealthy White woman is second only to a wealthy white man, unless the person has a title like Queen of England or President of Russia and this class position puts them better off than all of them. Understanding this is important and relates to chances, opportunity and position.

"Let's talk about institutional racism"-Guy from place that still has royalty

Giggle

Originally posted by Surtur
"Let's talk about institutional racism"-Guy from place that still has royalty

Giggle

I've lived in many places, with many situations, I would never deny institutionalized racism in the UK or white privilege in Africa. I live well off the second and never deny it to anyone of any race, none of that means I agree with it or don't wish it changed.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Ior white privilege in Africa. I live well off the second and never deny it to anyone of any race, none of that means I agree with it or don't wish it changed.

You white devil!

Originally posted by Surtur
You white devil!
No doubt in many ways people like me propagate imperialism. But mechanisms and machinery for that go on anyway. This is truth...
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Class and race are interesting as is the relationship between sex class and race. A wealthy black woman will always be in a better position than a poor white man but not as good a position as a rich black man, but a poor white man will usually be better off than a poor black woman, who will often be better off than a poor black man in chances as well as economically. Obviously, a wealthy White woman is second only to a wealthy white man, unless the person has a title like Queen of England or President of Russia and this class position puts them better off than all of them. Understanding this is important and relates to chances, opportunity and position.
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Class and race are interesting as is the relationship between sex class and race. A wealthy black woman will always be better off than a poor white man, but a poor white man will usually be better off than a poor black woman, who will often be better off than a poor black man in chances as well as economically. Obviously, a wealthy White man is better off than all of them. Understanding this is important and relate to chances, opportunity and position.

Ok, I'm willing to accept that then we have the problem of black single family homes, banish that problem and many problems of poor blacks are gone.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
No doubt in many ways people like me propagate imperialism. But mechanisms and machinery for that go on anyway. This is truth...

How many black butlers do you have? Which one is your...okay I forget the characters name, but who is your Samuel Jackson from Django Unchained?

Originally posted by Surtur
"Let's talk about institutional racism"-Guy from place that still has royalty

Giggle

hilariously no one tackles the real problem here and ppl like whirly pretend there is system but the system is self imposed, wake up.