Cancel Culture turned its gaze to Baby Yoda

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Are you asserting that disciplining your kids is inherently child abuse?

I don't think so. I think he is asserting this:

Originally posted by ilikecomics
A society that allows adults to act like emotional terrorists towards their children, an association that involves zero choice on the child's part, will allow people to abuse their children.

The international statistics on child abuse are dismal, 80 percent of children are abused.

It's called the banality of evil, friend.

Why does he keep needing you to explain shit to him?

Today i learned people will try to use sophistry on nearly defunt chat forums to justify hitting their kids.

Check out a book called spare the child, it's about the christian roots of corporeal punishment on kids.

Originally posted by Surtur
Why does he keep needing you to explain shit to him?

We are a duo.

He's just the one pointing out the simple things, asking the questions. I provide the clarifications and answers.

Don't ruin our thing, man. It's working out for both of us. But he could kiss a bit more...he's not as romantic as he used to be.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Today i learned people will try to use sophistry on nearly defunt chat forums to justify hitting their kids.

Check out a book called spare the child, it's about the christian roots of corporeal punishment on kids.

Dr. James Dobson or Greven?

Originally posted by Surtur
The point is it's ignorant to shrug off bias with "twitter isn't real life".

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Stay triggered over Twitter then.

Originally posted by dadudemon
We are a duo.

He's just the one pointing out the simple things, asking the questions. I provide the clarifications and answers.

Don't ruin our thing, man. It's working out for both of us. But he could kiss a bit more...he's not as romantic as he used to be.

So it's like Rain Man and he's Dustin Hoffman.

Originally posted by Robtard

^Doesn't want to try to contend with the points made, instead quotes known liar as if it's a victory. Reasons for this are as yet unknown.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Today i learned people will try to use sophistry on nearly defunt chat forums to justify hitting their kids.

Check out a book called spare the child, it's about the christian roots of corporeal punishment on kids.

It's not really fair for you to get mad at me here. You're the one asserting that disciplining your children is inherently child abuse and criticizing people on twitter is equivalent to murder. Am I wrong?

Originally posted by dadudemon
We are a duo.

He's just the one pointing out the simple things, asking the questions. I provide the clarifications and answers.

Don't ruin our thing, man. It's working out for both of us. But he could kiss a bit more...he's not as romantic as he used to be.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Dr. James Dobson or Greven?

Greven

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Ah, don't be pretend to know what sophistry is- you've already proven yourself to be an idiot.

It's not really fair for you to get mad at me here. You're the one asserting that disciplining your children is inherently child abuse and criticizing people on twitter is equivalent to murder.
You knew what this was, you always knew. You whore.

Your obvious highground is made more obvious through ad hominem.

Only winners do that.

It's needs to be clarified for the plebs that:

A) Disciplining children isn't child abuse, as there's a huge gap between say grounding your child and punching them. The later being child abuse

B) Attacking people on Twitter isn't comparable to murder, not even remotely comparable

Originally posted by Robtard
It's needs to be clarified for the plebs that:

A) Disciplining children isn't child abuse, as there's a huge gap between say grounding your child and punching them. The later being child abuse

B) Attacking people on Twitter isn't comparable to murder, not even remotely comparable

Fully agree

Detective Teg was right about you

Originally posted by Robtard
It's needs to be clarified for the plebs that:

A) Disciplining children isn't child abuse, as there's a huge gap between say grounding your child and punching them. The later being child abuse

B) Attacking people on Twitter isn't comparable to murder, not even remotely comparable

Why did this need to be clarified when nobody made these arguments?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Your obvious highground is made more obvious through ad hominem.

Only winners do that.

An ad hominem would be me saying that your argument is wrong because you're retarded. You being retarded is not related to why your assertion that bullying people on twitter is fascism is incorrect.

Someone who needed self explanatory posts explained multiple times calling other folk retarded.

Good stuff 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
Why did this need to be clarified when nobody made these arguments?

You're wrong again:

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Cancel culture is a dress rehearsal for mass murder.

If you can disappear someone from their job, or a digital or entertainment space, for example, with no one noticing, then it signals disappearing for real wouldnt be met with much blow back.

You didn't prove that, but okay

Bottom line this: say there is no social media bias.

Who wants to go first?