Originally posted by carver9
There are some stars that have 1 planet orbiting it whereas our star...We haven't traversed the entire universe, so there could be stars that doesnt even have planets orbiting it.
The same rules doesn't apply to each star. Also, is that star still by pluto? If not, prove it.
Yes that's right, double down on this😂
Originally posted by abhilegend
"The star born" is an obvious hyperbolic statement unless marvel Earth has two suns in the solar system.
?????
It's straight up said "A Star is Born Near Pluto."
What's hyperbolic about that?
"Water is wet."
"Fire is hot."
"The Earth has gravity."
It happened, we see it happening, and narration confirmed it happened. 😂
Clearly Marvel Earth no longer has two Suns near in its solar system. Or maybe distance is relative. Near Pluto could be a few light years away. It's not our job to figure that out, Marvel has editors.
You create a feat thread, Carver posts feats, and you ignore the feat and you laugh at him? Wtf? Then why make the thread?
A few panels later Reed Richards, using his scientific instruments says the explosion was "near-Nova" proportions.
Originally posted by abhilegend
So marvel Earth has two suns? One near pluto?😂
Idiot.
Where did Ronan or WarThor or Jane showed planetary strength or power? I'm not talking about mother storm here.Nova Prime would be an amp with whole nova force.
What's the point of making a thread and then ignoring feats pre-emptively? Make a better OP. Here I'll help:
"Only post feats I like, and any feats I don't like are ignored."
Mother Storm IS Mjolnir. It's like the operating system of an Iron Man suit.
Richard Rider's most prolific and famous run is when he was Nova Prime with the full Nova-Force. The Annihilation era was the status quo for like 6 years. I'm not sure what's up now though. I think he's dead?
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Carver isn't in the wrong here. Why are you laughing at him? Laugh at Shooter.
I am laughing because his proofs for the Marvel Solar System having two stars include posts like this:
Originally posted by carver9
There are some stars that have 1 planet orbiting it whereas our star...We haven't traversed the entire universe, so there could be stars that doesnt even have planets orbiting it.
The same rules doesn't apply to each star. Also, is that star still by pluto? If not, prove it.
Originally posted by carver9
So every star have the same purpose as a sun?
Come on. You and I both know that this is laughable debating - if abhi or Phildo made these kinds of posts, you would be tearing them a new one.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
?????It's straight up said "A Star is Born Near Pluto."
What's hyperbolic about that?
"Water is wet."
"Fire is hot."
"The Earth has gravity."
It happened, we see it happening, and narration confirmed it happened. 😂
What we saw was an explosion (Nova level, half a solar system I have no problem with). Its the insistence that it birthed a new star.
Clearly Marvel Earth no longer has two Suns near in its solar system. Or maybe distance is relative. Near Pluto could be a few light years away. It's not our job to figure that out, Marvel has editors.
facepalm
Everyone, rage thinks Pluto is lightyears away. Dude, they were explicitly inside the solar system. Are you retarded or something?
You create a feat thread, Carver posts feats, and you ignore the feat and you laugh at him? Wtf? Then why make the thread?
A few panels later [b]Reed Richards, using his scientific instruments says the explosion was "near-Nova" proportions. [/B]
And that I've absolutely no problem with. Its the insistence that Marvel Earth has two suns.
Originally posted by carver9
Yes.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
What's the point of making a thread and then ignoring feats pre-emptively? Make a better OP. Here I'll help:"Only post feats I like, and any feats I don't like are ignored."
Mother Storm IS Mjolnir. It's like the operating system of an Iron Man suit.
Richard Rider's most prolific and famous run is when he was Nova Prime with the full Nova-Force. The Annihilation era was the status quo for like 6 years. I'm not sure what's up now though. I think he's dead?
And that was an amped Nova, not to mention that Rider had full nova force for only a few issues if you actually read the book.
This is one of the stupidest threads i've ever came across. What DOES this exactly prove?
feats are nothing. I've never heard a writer or editor say "feats" in the way KMC debaters use it. Cuz at DC editorial NO SUCH CONCEPT EXISTS! It's about story. Not a particular punch that you can say makes a person such and such a tier. Cuz there are also no tiers. This isn't an rpg or tcg. That feat shit IS NOT REALLY A THING to comic creators. Just story. period
That's why they write stories you call lowballs. That's why they write stories you call outliers. Because they write stories, not feats and will increase or decrease or add new or delete old abilities on a whim. Like they always have done.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
This is one of the stupidest threads i've ever came across. What DOES this exactly prove?feats are nothing. I've never heard a writer or editor say "feats" in the way KMC debaters use it. Cuz at DC editorial NO SUCH CONCEPT EXISTS! It's about story. Not a particular punch that you can say makes a person such and such a tier. Cuz there are also no tiers. This isn't an rpg or tcg. That feat shit IS NOT REALLY A THING to comic creators. Just story. period
That's why they write stories you call lowballs. That's why they write stories you call outliers. Because they write stories, not feats and will increase or decrease or add new or delete old abilities on a whim. Like they always have done.
...Okay?
Want to tell us more, Captain Obvious?
You either care about feats or you don't. Either is fine. But if you don't, you're on the wrong forum.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Yeah, but that point could be made about this entire forum, and yet you still post here.
So you're ignoring there are no consistent feats? No standard bar. No measure where you can say "that can never happen" cuz it can and will the second a writer says so. This ain't reality. There are no rules. It's all made up and subject to change on a moment's notice
How over reliance on feats leads to a weird, stagnated idea of characters. Personalities, motivations. These things are more consistent. These things matter more in understanding a character.
The strengths levels literally fluctuate from page to page within the same book at times.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
So you're ignoring there are no consistent feats? No standard bar. No measure where you can say "that can never happen" cuz it can and will the second a writer says so. This ain't reality. There are no rules. It's all made up and subject to change on a moment's noticeHow over reliance on feats leads to a weird, stagnated idea of characters. Personalities, motivations. These things are more consistent. These things matter more in understanding a character.
The strengths levels literally fluctuate from page to page within the same book at times.
You literally have not read the rules about how characters function on this board, have you.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
This is one of the stupidest threads i've ever came across. What DOES this exactly prove?feats are nothing. I've never heard a writer or editor say "feats" in the way KMC debaters use it. Cuz at DC editorial NO SUCH CONCEPT EXISTS! It's about story. Not a particular punch that you can say makes a person such and such a tier. Cuz there are also no tiers. This isn't an rpg or tcg. That feat shit IS NOT REALLY A THING to comic creators. Just story. period
That's why they write stories you call lowballs. That's why they write stories you call outliers. Because they write stories, not feats and will increase or decrease or add new or delete old abilities on a whim. Like they always have done.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
My point is this thread is pointless because scaling and tiering doesn't exist except in the minds of fans. period.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
So you're ignoring there are no consistent feats? No standard bar. No measure where you can say "that can never happen" cuz it can and will the second a writer says so. This ain't reality. There are no rules. It's all made up and subject to change on a moment's noticeHow over reliance on feats leads to a weird, stagnated idea of characters. Personalities, motivations. These things are more consistent. These things matter more in understanding a character.
The strengths levels literally fluctuate from page to page within the same book at times.
Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Motherstorm mew mew was standard for Janethor.WM was standard for Nova Prime, who is considered low herald in the forum. Rich had full access to nova force. It was regulated by his suit.
Full nova force IS an amp for the Rider.
Originally posted by carver9
A star was created ABHI. Deal with it and move on.
I have to move on?
Originally posted by abhilegend
No, it is not.Full nova force IS an amp for the Rider.
Having access to full nova force was what mad him Nova Prime. It was not an amp. And like i said, it was regulated through his suit. Having access to an unlimited energy source doesnt mean u are using it in its entirety at all times.