Strength equalized battle

Started by h1a85 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
You'd be more believable if you didn't originally ignore half of his metric and then proceeded to try and refute a strawman version of his argument.
I didn't ignore it. If you didn't have bad reading comprehension then you would have understood that I was asking why the first part of the metric is relevant. AND implies both are relevant.
Silent: "I like pineapples because they are yellow AND taste good. "
H1a8: "Why is yellow relevant in a pineapple?"
Silent: "I said, I like pineapples because of both metrics. Why are you leaving out my 2nd metric?
H1a8: "What an idiot."

You ignored half his metric and then attacked a strawman version of his argument

Originally posted by Silent Master
You ignored half his metric and then attacked a strawman version of his argument
Originally posted by h1a8

Silent: "I like pineapples because they are yellow AND taste good. "
H1a8: "Why is yellow relevant in a pineapple?"
Silent: "I said, I like pineapples because of both metrics. Why are you leaving out my 2nd metric?
H1a8: "What an idiot."
Originally posted by Silent Master
You ignored half his metric and then attacked a strawman version of his argument

Originally posted by Surtur
Zod *should* be more skilled than Thanos given he was literally genetically bred to be a soldier, but he couldn't even easily defeat a dude who was bred to be a scientist.

Also Zod could have just terraformed Mars. A good soldier would know you don't fight a battle you do not have to fight. So he is shitty at fighting and at common sense.

Yes it would of been cool to see Zod terraform mars and bring the Kryptonians back