Originally posted by Silent MasterI didn't ignore it. If you didn't have bad reading comprehension then you would have understood that I was asking why the first part of the metric is relevant. AND implies both are relevant.
You'd be more believable if you didn't originally ignore half of his metric and then proceeded to try and refute a strawman version of his argument.
Silent: "I like pineapples because they are yellow AND taste good. "
H1a8: "Why is yellow relevant in a pineapple?"
Silent: "I said, I like pineapples because of both metrics. Why are you leaving out my 2nd metric?
H1a8: "What an idiot."