Election integrity hearing held in Arizona
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfC2T7UpxkI&t=9973s
Over ten and a half hours of testimony from eyewitnesses, but remember, naaaaw, there's no evidence of fraud you kooky right-wing conspiracy theorist! 😆
Just like there is no evidence the sky is blue either ya nutty conspiracy theorist!😆
Re: Election integrity hearing held in Arizona
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaeYeah let's see how this holds up under actual scrutiny and in a court of law instead a jerk off meeting where they just get to talk. 😆
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfC2T7UpxkI&t=9973sOver ten and a half hours of testimony from eyewitnesses, but remember, naaaaw, there's no evidence of fraud you kooky right-wing conspiracy theorist! 😆
Just like there is no evidence the sky is blue either ya nutty conspiracy theorist!😆
There is a reason after all that they are pulling this stunt. It's because they keep getting destroyed in the courts.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnaeDid you actually listen to any of the testimony?
*snowflake leftist covers up eyes and plugs ears while screaming "I've seen no evidence!"*😂
Oh leftists... smh.
I flipped through some real quick.
One person said she felt uneasy because one poll watcher for the Democrats said they were sent there to turn the precinct blue.
When kind of pressed the poll watcher said they were there to make sure if people were turned away that they, the poll watcher, had lawyers on speed dial to help them determine if they were turned away legally.
That was it. That was the nefarious scheme this lady talked about. A poll watcher that had gotten sent to the precinct from California to make sure people getting turned away had a chance to consult with free legal counsel. To be honest she was the one that was turning people away and she seemed more upset that someone would question her then she did about the idea of voter fraud.
No wonder they are getting killed in the courts.
I suppose what is interesting is that each of the machines that counts votes saves the image as an auto setting and the ppl in charge are either turning that feature off or deleting the actual ballot data.
Seems to me the easiest way to verify results is to simply look at the electronic ballot data that they won't release or destroyed.........
Originally posted by snowdragonThat I would be more interest in.
Yeah I blew through that but at 5:13 they get to the mathematical analysis done by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai and that is worth listening to, imo.
My problem with this format is there is no breakdown or review of what the cybersecurity and intellectuals are doing in this meeting.
Honestly I doubt 90% of the people listening to Shiva and the cyber security expert would even know the topics they are talking about much less if their interpretation is accurate.
I myself work in the technology industry as a programmer. So I know a lot of the terminology the one cyber security expert was using. That being said I am not a cyber security expert so even I can't really validate what he is saying as true or false with some additional research on my end.
What I will say is that I would expect a company who is securing their voting machines and having them undergo client testing to also think about these issues. And even some preliminary google responses from the company debunk some of what that expert was saying or that it was as important as he was making it out to be.
So I think the main issue is this just comes off as a stunt to me and if this was really valid it would have held up in the courts much better than it did.
So I think the main issue is this just comes off as a stunt to me and if this was really valid it would have held up in the courts much better than it did.
Could be, I'm not watching court cases or listening to them this was just done yesterday though my main take away though was:
Seems to me the easiest way to verify results is to simply look at the electronic ballot data that they won't release or destroyed.........
We don't need to do recounts, we don't need to hand check ballots, it's supposedly all been saved by the machines so use the existing data that presents the voting totals and allow said electronic ballots to be viewed, should be easy.
Seems like we are just complicating this entire process.
Originally posted by BadabingWhat irregularities are you referring to? I would be interested in hearing more.
I know this isn't exactly the topic of the thread, but it's close.Given the irregularities being reported in Georgia regarding the GA governor and secretary of state, should the complaint from Stacey Abrams be reconsidered?
Originally posted by Badabing
I know this isn't exactly the topic of the thread, but it's close.Given the irregularities being reported in Georgia regarding the GA governor and secretary of state, should the complaint from Stacey Abrams be reconsidered?
Aren't they using the same system as AZ, if so I think they also should release the ballot data to review the ballots that were counted.