Ex-Broadmoor shrink claims Donald Trump 'acts in similar way to Jimmy Savile'

Originally posted by Robtard
Cos you're a bad faith assclown.

So it's clear you don't actually think Trump is a pedo.

All I needed to know 👆

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
😂

Not the first time Surt has tried to cover his hypocrisy with "but it was teh jokes b4!"

Originally posted by Robtard
Not the first time Surt has tried to cover his hypocrisy with "but it was teh jokes b4!"

^Defended Blake doing the same.

🙂

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/shrink-claims-trump-acts-similar-19571700

Jimmy Savile quote-“When you are in my position, you can have any p***y you want – rather Trump-like in a way as Trump once said "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.-Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything."

It was all much more to do with power than abho-rrent sexual desires.”

Least he's not being compared to a bedopile. 😱

Side note: I do love these shrinks who torch their credibility in order to talk shit about Trump lol. It would be oh so simple to be silent. Especially when he is on his way out.

TDS 😆

Originally posted by Surtur
^Defended Blake doing the same.

🙂

Seems you're referring to the time Blake mocked you people by feeding into the claim that he loved Hitler. You poor, poor stupid little man.

Originally posted by Robtard
Seems you're referring to the time Blake mocked you people by feeding into the claim that he loved Hitler. You poor, poor stupid little man.

No I'm referring to Blake agreeing with Biden's racist comments and then backtracking once he realized the people who he bootlicks will frown upon it.

But you tried 🙂

You must be mad right?

Originally posted by Surtur
Because there aren't dozens of credible accusations against him 🙂

There isn't one credible accusation. Show me any proof beyond "they said it happened". Proof it happened. Not proof of anything else.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE

[QUOTE=17153230]Originally posted by Robtard
-In June 2019, columnist E. Jean Carroll accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her by forcing his penis inside her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s.

There is semen on her dress from that assault. I cannot wait for his DNA to be subpoenaed in her defamation lawsuit against him. The Trumper meltdown is going to be epic. [/QUOTE]

If that semen matches, wonder how Trump will defend it considering he's already said he never touched her.

That's also the lawsuit where Trump very recently tried (and failed) to get his name removed as the defendant and replaced with 'The United States of America'. What shit-weasel.

I'm sure if the semen on her dress matches Trumps' DNA; that means he sexually assaulted her.

Not that they had consensual sex and now she's accusing him of a crime.

Originally posted by wxyz
I'm sure if the semen on her dress matches Trumps' DNA; that means he sexually assaulted her.

Not that they had consensual sex and now she's accusing him of a crime.

Originally posted by wxyz
I'm sure if the semen on her dress matches Trumps' DNA; that means he sexually assaulted her.

Not that they had consensual sex and now she's accusing him of a crime.

iirc, Trump didn't say they had consensual sex, Trump said he never touched her.

But I'm sure if the jizz matches, that will be Trump's new defense and people like you will defend it.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[B]There is semen on her dress from that assault. I cannot wait for his DNA to be subpoenaed in her defamation lawsuit against him. The Trumper meltdown is going to be epic.

I asked for evidence. You provided nothing but a claim.

Originally posted by wxyz
I'm sure if the semen on her dress matches Trumps' DNA; that means he sexually assaulted her.

Not that they had consensual sex and now she's accusing him of a crime.

This is true and this fact will not be well received. At best it would show Trump lied about f*cking her, but he has done this "I don't know u" with plenty of people.

Now me pointing this out will be pounced on, as I said: this fact will not be well received.

At least the silver lining here is that, for now, these folk have more or less acknowledged they have no evidence Trump assaulted anyone. Oh they will hoot and holler and thrash over this fact, they'll call you a sock, they'll say "reeee" and all that.

It will be glorious 🙂

I like how Whirly and Robtard are basically agreeing with her.

Claims are just that, claims.

They are not proof, or evidence.

This works for you too, surt:

Originally posted by Robtard
iirc, Trump didn't say they had consensual sex, Trump said he never touched her.

But I'm sure if the jizz matches, that will be Trump's new defense and people like you will defend it.

Originally posted by Robtard
This works for you too, surt:

And I'm sure you'll say it equates to rape despite not being proof.

The only thing it is proof of is Trump lied about banging her.

I've seen her, I can't blame him for lying 🙂

Originally posted by wxyz
I like how Whirly and Robtard are basically agreeing with her.

Claims are just that, claims.

They are not proof, or evidence.

We're talking about the future if the DNA matches. That's proof.

I suspect DNA evidence will suddenly not matter to you people.

This works for you too, surt:

Originally posted by Robtard
We're talking about the future if the DNA matches. That's proof.

I suspect DNA evidence will suddenly not matter to you people.