Which is Superman greatest strength feat

Started by cdtm6 pages

Lifting Infinity.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I don't even consider either of them to be his best strength feat, and this isn't really a vs thread, so why should it stay open?

Where do you rate brain wrecking JBL and Trollbert feat wise?

Originally posted by JBL
Supermans greatest strength feat is his ability to get his large group of lovers to merge together and spread and believe lies about him having Dynamic strength, destroying a multiverse, fighting at light speeding and having his fans insult other people that see through those lies. Now that's his greatest strength feat... Strength in numbers, even though they are a bunch of LIARS.👍

Superman broke you

Neither is close to being his greatest, but the chain breaking is the better one. The planet breaking is impressive for Superman through context of the feat, not that it's planet breaking.

Stopping Mjolnir.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Stopping Mjolnir.

😆

Re: Which is Superman greatest strength feat

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
planet shattering

or

"Star" hauling chains

We need to pick from these two?

Chains, then.

Picking one from all of his feats? Not sure, but the book with infinite number of pages comes to mind.

The chain one is obviously superior. Like, it's stellar level. That's better than a casual planet denting feat.

Overall, breaking space and time, shaking the phantom zone, defeating death, lifting the boip, etc could win.

Those aren’t his greatest strength feats but if I have to compare the two, I’d say it all depends depowered Superman was on the second scan. Was he at .00001% left? If so, that’s a better feat

Destroying a planet while in a depowered dehydrated state by jumping off of it.

Both these feats show that Superman can do anything.

Hundreds, if not thousands of alternate supermen died on the planet trying to escape.

He was nearly powerless but still destroyed a planet just by jumping off. I don’t know if anyone in comics can do this at full power.

This showed Superman if he wants to do something that no one else can, even at .0000001 he can do it .

The chains feat was the same situation. Stuck in a impossible situation and only he could get out because the S is greater than all in comics.
From these 2 feats, something no one in comics can do via strength alone, I think the chains feat is more impressive.

Because of the situation, Superman had to be successful. To save himself while on the planet and the girl while chained. If Superman was running on empty while chained up he would have broken those too because he’s Superman.

The chains feat requires more physical strength than destroying a planet by just jumping off. If math proves me wrong I’ll change my view on this.

Benching earths weight for five days.

Originally posted by Diesldude
Both these feats show that Superman can do anything.

Hundreds, if not thousands of alternate supermen died on the planet trying to escape.

He was nearly powerless but still destroyed a planet just by jumping off. I don’t know if anyone in comics can do this at full power.

This showed Superman if he wants to do something that no one else can, even at .0000001 he can do it .

The chains feat was the same situation. Stuck in a impossible situation and only he could get out because the S is greater than all in comics.
From these 2 feats, something no one in comics can do via strength alone, I think the chains feat is more impressive.

Because of the situation, Superman had to be successful. To save himself while on the planet and the girl while chained. If Superman was running on empty while chained up he would have broken those too because he’s Superman.

The chains feat requires more physical strength than destroying a planet by just jumping off. If math proves me wrong I’ll change my view on this.

What? He destroyed a small planet. no information on its surface gravity or mass, it's unquantifiable

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
What? He destroyed a small planet. no information on its surface gravity or mass, it's unquantifiable
if there is no information on gravity or mass then how do you know it was a smalll planet. Proof you make up shit as you go along.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
What? He destroyed a small planet. no information on its surface gravity or mass, it's unquantifiable

It was also said that things in that dimension is different.

Originally posted by carver9
It was also said that things in that dimension is different.
😂 you’re confusing it with Umar’s dimension where everything is soft.

Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
What? He destroyed a small planet. no information on its surface gravity or mass, it's unquantifiable

😂

Originally posted by Diesldude
if there is no information on gravity or mass then how do you know it was a smalll planet. Proof you make up shit as you go along.

Let's take a look at this description:

Does that LOOK like its cleared its neighborhood around its orbit
Mercury and mars are terrestrial planets with high density and volcanic cores. And both have sustained gravity as such to clear their orbit. That is a planetoid that fit all the criteria of one

Originally posted by Diesldude
😂 you’re confusing it with Umar’s dimension where everything is soft.

😂 In Supermans case, It was built in a universe that necessarily didn't function like our own, different sets of laws built specifically to contain him and they didnt work. Bent like a tooth pick.

alberto been melting down lately

you alright bud?