Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Because like I said before, He is a star. So by definition, He has stellar mass.If you want using RL physics then we apply to both of them. If you want accepting both are comic books nonsenses then we accept that at face value. Lets be consistent
Im not even tryint to argue which feat is better, I just pointed out if we apply RL science for one side then we should also question other side, Either both are vailid or invalid.lets be consistent.
If we count them both as feat, Then we can move on to comparing them.
Since he is a star, by definition, he has stellar density. The only stars with remotely the density you claim are neutron stars, which don't even produce heat nor have cores. Clearly he is not that, so he would have to have normal stellar density wich is moderately more than the density of water and humans.
Proxima references a generic star with no details of the star's size, therefore the default position is that it is an average star or sun. We can actually see Last Sun's size/volume which indicates infitisimal mass compared to a normal star.
This is just a legitimate as the notion of needing stellar mass and if you don't accept this, you must accept Last Sun's mass as being ambiguous in a way totally unlike the clear cut statement of what Hulk endures. Otherwise, we can discard the chain feat since we know not the size of those stars and we have to accept that Xorn is stronger than Superman.
Originally posted by TheHulkster
Since he is a star, by definition, he has stellar density. The only stars with remotely the density you claim are neutron stars, which don't even produce heat nor have cores. Clearly he is not that, so he would have to have normal stellar density wich is moderately more than the density of water and humans.Proxima references a generic star with no details of the star's size, therefore the default position is that it is an average star or sun. We can actually see Last Sun's size/volume which indicates infitisimal mass compared to a normal star.
This is just a legitimate as the notion of needing stellar mass and if you don't accept this, you must accept Last Sun's mass as being ambiguous in a way totally unlike the clear cut statement of what Hulk endures. Otherwise, we can discard the chain feat since we know not the size of those stars and we have to accept that Xorn is stronger than Superman.
Exactly this.
People screaming about how Hulk's feat is legit should also accept Superman's breaking those stellar chains 👆
Xorn's star size was given, btw, just fyi.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
RL stars =/= comic stars.
For one, not in the slightest. You’re assuming that this white dwarf is it’s original size. If we look at the fragment he originally got his powers from it was actually near enough the same size as shown with supes holding it. Difference is that he said this is the White Dwarf. Not the fragment. The same way you're making these wild assumptions I could also assume he shrunk down the original white dwarf. I mean it wouldn’t make sense to bring a white dwarf to earth at its original size. It would be too big
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So you are telling me the SIZE of the star named matters, not just the TYPE?Interesting.
that’s literally what’s been said consistently throughout this entire discussion. Stars come in many shapes and sizes. That doesnt mean they all way trillions upon quintillions of tons. And especially if shrunken down as the atom did to the Red Suns. There’s no way in hell they would then way the same. If you increase the size of an ant the mass you increase dramatically. Considering it’s highly armoured (exoskeleton) it would weigh considerably more then a normal human. That doesn’t mean the normal sized ants weigh the same as this human sized ant
Originally posted by Diesldude
Was the Last Son a star
Yes or No?Simple question for Trollberto, carter, thehulkster.
Yeah no he's not a literal star. He is just made of the same stuff. That stellar mass think is a COMPLETE fabrication.
Tell you what, show me an official source that confirms his mass and I won't argue this any further. Go ahead 😂 BETTER be good
Originally posted by carver9
I'm guessing that means Cassandra threw stellar mass and lilandra withstood star mass on top of her. Beastly fts...
Also, this.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilall I asked for was a simple yes or no.
Yeah no he's not a literal star. He is just made of the same stuff. That stellar mass think is a COMPLETE fabrication.Tell you what, show me an official source that confirms his mass and I won't argue this any further. Go ahead 😂 BETTER be good
Is he a star yes or no? Simple question forget everything else you said. Answer with a yes or no.