Originally posted by Stoic
It's not my body because I'm a man, but if asked to abort or allow the baby a chance to live, I'd choose the latter. Adoption does exist after all. However, if there was a way of knowing whether ot not the child would be born with major defects that would cost more than I could handle, the waters then become a bit murkier. To be honest, if my child was going to be born mentally handicapped and I knew this during the fetus stage, I'd want to abort.The act of abortion is rarely as cut and dry as you'd first think, and in not being able to see every angle, judgements tend to arise. I mean what if a women is gang raped and finds out that she became pregnant? Is it still as cut and dry when, or if she decides to abort?
Pro Life? Pro Choice? The Blame Game? I was raised to believe that life is 99% attitude and 1% circumstance, but sometimes that 1% manifests itself in our lives and we are then forced to make choices based upon it.
A woman who chooses to get an abortion is not aborting her own body, it is someone else's body. She is making a conscious decision to have another human being (seperate heart, seperate body, seperate DNA, etc...) terminated. It is murder no matter how anyone here tries to spin it.
It should not be the woman's choice any more than it is yours unless her life was actually at risk in having the baby. Getting an abortion is usually more dangerous to the woman than having it is though.
One of the government's duties is to make sure our individual liberties/rights are upheld. No right is more fundamental than the inherent right to life all human beings have. Abortions should be completely banned. Period.